Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
No excuse whatsoever. If I was a jockey (admittedly putting several pounds overweight) and especially a conditional, I’d have a reference point, which, aside from the lollipop would tell me I’ve gone past the finishing line.
Agree Marlingford. What she did was totally out of order and I think none of us condone it. She’s out of the Olympics but you have a convicted sex offender representing the Netherlands; can someone please explain that one to me!
Truly bloody awful and to witness the aftermath; I can’t imagine what the Hunt family are going through.
We are all entitled to our opinions but i do sometimes wonder what people want to see from the ITV broadcast. Overall, i think they do a good job and we as racing fans have live racing every week and with Royal Ascot and other meetings, we have midweek racing as well on terrestrial. The comments around “having a Royal winner”, what’s the problem? it is after all Royal Ascot. I bet if we trawl back through the television archives, we might have someone saying “to top the meeting off it would be good if Henry Cecil/Michael Stoute/Geoff Wragg (insert your own trainer) had a winner”. ITV must be doing something right though, as people on here must be watching the whole show for them to be giving negative comments. If you don’t like the coverage, you can either do a Chezza and put the mute button on or as racing fans you know when each race is off, so just tune in then, watch the race and then switch off.
Now Yeats that is nostalgic; FA Cup draw on radio 2. Remember sneaking off to the toilet at school to listen on my Walkman, to find out who Saints would draw. As for the Derby reverting back to a Wednesday, to me it would make it a bit more special but alas that’s not going to happen. How did they stretch Epsom out for four days when I was kid? Come the Oaks on the Saturday and the course was looking tired.
What’s with all the negativity? Fabulous training and riding performance and let’s wait for a few months down the line to see if this was a poor renewal.
Do i detect a slight defence of his jockey by John Gosden (in case she is beaten), by suggesting that Emily Upjohn is not quite there yet but will be spot on for her next run. Or am i reading too much into it and he’s just being honest?
i too wish there was less negativity prior to the race; look back in a couple of months and if it wasn’t up to scratch then fair enough. Just looking at recent history and off relatively low ratings we’ve had the likes of Snowfall winning off 108, Enable off 107 and Taghrooda off 103. Even beaten horses like Emily Upjohn (110), Nashwa (107) and Tarnawa (101) have gone on to big race successes.
At this rate Mr Shepherd might not be the only one losing rides, watch out Mr Shoemark.
If I were the connections of Maasai Mara I would be very aggrieved with the starter and being declared a runner to boot!
It is what it is nowadays. Of course it’s easier then when i started to watch the race, back in the days of The Pilgarlic but rightly or wrongly we are not going to go back. To be honest though every course seems to be easier than it used to be. I remember watching the Charlie Hall in the eighties and Wetherby was tough to jump, the same at the old Haydock and in particular the third last at Kempton. Cheltenham is meant to be the pinnacle but is that really the test it once was. I do echo GM23’s thoughts though, insomuch that it was an easier watch compared to last year.
Even if you are for or against the changes, we now know whats needed to win these days, so go and fill your pockets!Looks like three odds on chances this season, two of which were in races against professionals. Okay, we know we’re we are at with David Maxwell but I still think he had a good ride yesterday.
To be fair to David Maxwell, his win stats are just below Jack Tudor and above Brendan Powell, so maybe these two jockeys shouldn’t have ridden in the race either! He also doesn’t just compete in Hunter Chases but in races against professionals (don’t know the numbers of each though).
