The home of intelligent horse racing discussion
The home of intelligent horse racing discussion

FrankieMac

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 17 posts - 154 through 170 (of 187 total)
1 2 3 … 9 10 11
  • Author
    Posts
  • February 17, 2017 at 21:26 in reply to: I'd be grateful for your help #1287760
    FrankieMac
    Participant
    • Total Posts 187

    Done :good:

    February 4, 2017 at 07:25 in reply to: TRF vs Pricewise 2017 #1285621
    FrankieMac
    Participant
    • Total Posts 187

    Triumph – DDS win 4/1 general

    January 31, 2017 at 22:18 in reply to: TRF vs Pricewise 2017 #1285078
    FrankieMac
    Participant
    • Total Posts 187
    Fran the man wrote:
    FrankieMac wrote:

    Damn pricewise

    Alpha Des Obeaux 12/1 win

    Still 16’s on pp

    In that case, if it’s in the rules VTC, I’ll take the 16s too?

    January 31, 2017 at 21:58 in reply to: TRF vs Pricewise 2017 #1285072
    FrankieMac
    Participant
    • Total Posts 187

    Damn pricewise

    Alpha Des Obeaux 12/1 win

    January 31, 2017 at 10:56 in reply to: TRF vs Pricewise 2017 #1284930
    FrankieMac
    Participant
    • Total Posts 187

    Arkle – Altior win 4/5

    January 28, 2017 at 14:38 in reply to: Many Clouds #1284217
    FrankieMac
    Participant
    • Total Posts 187

    What a brave horse. Horrid.

    January 28, 2017 at 13:43 in reply to: 2017 Champion Hurdle #1284192
    FrankieMac
    Participant
    • Total Posts 187

    Mmm this could be interesting….Faugheen now not running tomorrow…

    January 25, 2017 at 16:13 in reply to: Gold Cup 2017 #1283759
    FrankieMac
    Participant
    • Total Posts 187

    Mr steeplechasing – fascinating stuff for a novice like me, keep it coming :good:

    January 25, 2017 at 10:32 in reply to: Annie Power out injured #1283699
    FrankieMac
    Participant
    • Total Posts 187

    Hope that’s not the last we see of her

    January 24, 2017 at 23:08 in reply to: TRF vs Pricewise 2017 #1283671
    FrankieMac
    Participant
    • Total Posts 187

    Supreme – Crack Mome 16/1 ew
    Neptune – Messire Des Obeaux 12/1 ew

    January 24, 2017 at 12:14 in reply to: JLT Novices Chase #1283567
    FrankieMac
    Participant
    • Total Posts 187

    Min has gone from 33s down to 12s in some places for the JLT

    January 24, 2017 at 12:08 in reply to: JLT Novices Chase #1283563
    FrankieMac
    Participant
    • Total Posts 187

    Anything to do with Mullins’ comments that he may take him back over hurdles?

    January 24, 2017 at 11:30 in reply to: Neptune novices hurdle 2017 #1283557
    FrankieMac
    Participant
    • Total Posts 187

    Apologies for returning to an old subject only slightly related to the Neptune.

    After protracted discussions with William Hill’s ‘customer service’ their position now is that the Tolworth/Albert Bartlett double is considered related contingency. However, the Tolworth/Neptune double isn’t and therefore is a valid bet.

    Does that make any sense to you chaps? It doesn’t to me.

    January 17, 2017 at 06:35 in reply to: TRF vs Pricewise 2017 #1282450
    FrankieMac
    Participant
    • Total Posts 187

    QMCC – Gods Own 20/1 ew general
    Ryanair – Ar Mad 25/1 ew Ladbrokes

    January 15, 2017 at 00:03 in reply to: Gold Cup 2017 #1282168
    FrankieMac
    Participant
    • Total Posts 187

    Any reasoning for your thoughts? Given the entries and likely starters, I’d be extremely surprised if Djakadam didn’t place. He won’t win, but I think his odds for an ew place are very attractive

    January 14, 2017 at 10:50 in reply to: Neptune novices hurdle 2017 #1281957
    FrankieMac
    Participant
    • Total Posts 187

    Hi Nathan,

    I am still “discussing” the issue with them…

    As for your bet, I suspect your wonderings are correct…are you going to ask or wait until TC wins…?

    January 12, 2017 at 00:54 in reply to: Neptune novices hurdle 2017 #1281542
    FrankieMac
    Participant
    • Total Posts 187

    Now this I wasn’t expecting:

    Upon checking your bet under reference of XXXXX I can confirm that we have divided |Albert Bartlett Novices’ Hurdle – 17th Mar 2017| and |32red Tolworth Novices’ Hurdle – 7th Jan 2017| as these are the selections that cannot be combined due to related contingency.

    A related contingency occurs when one part of the bet affects the outcome of the rest of the bet.

    For more information regarding related contingency you can use this link:

    Let me provide you the breakdown of your bet:https://williamhill-lang.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/69/kw/related%20contingency

    Selection A:
    |32red Tolworth Novices’ Hurdle – 7th Jan 2017| and |Neptune Investment Management Novices’ Hurdle – 15th Mar 2017|

    Selection B:
    |Albert Bartlett Novices’ Hurdle – 17th Mar 2017| and |Neptune Investment Management Novices’ Hurdle – 15th Mar 2017|

    A combination needs to win for you to get returns in your bet.

    We hope this explains everything now.

    They appear to be suggesting that the Tolworth and Albert Bartlett are related (fine) but are silent on the Tolworth and Neptune (??) at the same time as suggesting a double of the Neptune and Albert Bartlett is fine – which is not a bet I’ve made nor would any sane person. There’s no mention of odds either

    I think I’ll stick to singles in future…

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 17 posts - 154 through 170 (of 187 total)
1 2 3 … 9 10 11