The home of intelligent horse racing discussion
The home of intelligent horse racing discussion

Russia / Ukraine

Home Forums Lounge Russia / Ukraine

Viewing 17 posts - 579 through 595 (of 1,195 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1585149
    Avatar photoDrone
    Participant
    • Total Posts 6021

    Truss is a dimwit not remotely cognizant of the complex Foreign Office brief

    Anyway, Ellwood and Wallace – both ex-army and both in comparison intellectual titans – have put her right

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/feb/28/ben-wallace-distances-himself-from-truss-comments-on-uk-volunteers-for-ukraine

    #1585152
    Avatar photoGingertipster
    Participant
    • Total Posts 33116

    “Is this just another devil’s advocate reply Ginge, or do you really think that
    as Foreign Secretary Liz Trust should be advocating untrained men and women
    should be encouraged (“it’s a battle for democracy”) to head for a warzone
    to in all likelyhood to be killed, should they be involved in a battle”.

    Of course there is a good chance of them being killed, it’s a fecking war zone!
    But if someone wants to fight for Ukraine… someone with military experience fighting for democracy and / or returning to fight for their family and / or fighting for their motherland!!! Who are we to deny them?

    Value Is Everything
    #1585154
    Avatar photoBigG
    Participant
    • Total Posts 13286

    “If that is what they want to do; Why would you stop anyone with connections to Ukraine
    going to fight for Ukraine whether they’re trained or “untrained”, BigG?”

    You made no reference to that before Ginge, that would be a different set of circumstances
    and I can completely understand anyone with Ukraine connections wanting to head to their
    homeland and fight. I would agree with it.

    “really don’t expect – and Lizz Truss does not expect – many (if any) people who are without
    military experience AND without Ukraine connections going over to fight… (Unless having medical
    experience that would be useful).”

    Again that’s not what you said. How am I supposed to surmise what you are thinking, or afterthinking,
    when you don’t state it in your original post that I replied to.

    “…So that leaves those without Ukraine connection but with military experience (“trained”).
    And again – why would you stop anyone with military experience fighting for Ukraine / ie
    fighting for democracy, if that is what they themselves want to do?”

    Again nothing like you said before. You can’t type up a completely different post to try and
    justify your earlier comments which I replied to

    This was the sum total of which you wrote and I replied to

    “Personally I’d love British (NATO) troops to go into Ukraine, if it was not for the
    probability of it resulting in World War III, BigG… Therefore unfortunately have to be
    against British troops being involved.

    However, if any individual British person wanted to go over and fight for Ukraine it would not cause a World War and yes they’d be fighting for “democracy”. So if they want to I don’t see why they should be discouraged.

    So don’t see what the feck you have against what Lizz Truss said.
    Value Is Everything”

    That was the sum total of your post. As I said earlier, we’ve already agreed sending in troops
    would be a disaster. The rest of what you wrote “any individual British person (no mention of
    Ukraine ties) and ” So if they want to I don’t see why they should be discouraged.” was what I
    totally disagreed with, I wouldn’t send Brits over to Ukraine for the reasons I gave earlier,
    this is unlike the internal Spanish war in the 30s and they would be fighting a huge military
    force.

    Finally “So don’t see what the feck you have against what Lizz Truss said”

    She is completely out of her depth, and I would expect her to get a flea in her ear from
    her superiors. It was a reckless comment to make.

    You can’t just change the complete text of your post to try and prove a point. I’ve said
    this recently Ginge, you normally put up decent arguments, but this is below you.

    #1585155
    Avatar photoTonge
    Participant
    • Total Posts 3003

    @Drone – “dimwit” right enough but a dangerous one…

    BBC News, “Kremlin says President Putin’s nuclear alert was a response to a statement made by the British Foreign Secretary.”

    #1585157
    clivexx
    Blocked
    • Total Posts 2702

    Happily standing back from this now

    But going to lol at the tongue hanging out window lickers swallowing that drivel from the Kremlin about Truss

    #1585159
    clivexx
    Blocked
    • Total Posts 2702

    and just to deeply offend all those here (and lets face it…not found anywhere else that ive seen) who have made clear their issues with support for Ukraine from decent people with a moral compass, suck this up

    https://twitter.com/sportbible/status/1498035071315501060?s=20&t=3u-x3lrjFFvpBnJbnJIkHw

    #1585160
    Avatar photoBigG
    Participant
    • Total Posts 13286

    Nice gesture, I think he should be safe enough though :good:

    #1585162
    Richard88
    Participant
    • Total Posts 2888

    Liz Truss is perfectly capable of making herself look stupid, she doesn’t require the assistance of the Kremlin.

    #1585163
    Avatar photoBigG
    Participant
    • Total Posts 13286

    You have a point Richard.

    #1585171
    Avatar photoGingertipster
    Participant
    • Total Posts 33116

    My earlier post was very short BigG. Short posts don’t have as much information explaining my views than long posts. If looking at your post that I was in fact responding to, you implied Lizz Truss stopping the British troops going and yet allowing British individuals to go – was wrong of her… Which is why I deliberately used the word “British” and wrote about British people in particular in that earlier post.

    ie My earlier response was not particularly about which individuals should and should not go. It was more about why it would be a bad idea to send British NATO troops to Ukraine (if doing so we’d be in WWIII) and why it would be possible to let British (non-NATO) individuals go (if doing so we would NOT be in WWIII).

    What I am saying is yes, discourage those (very few if any) who are both without Ukraine connections and without military experience from going… But not if that is at the expense of stopping those with Ukrainian connections or Military experience from getting to Ukraine as quickly as possible.

    Value Is Everything
    #1585173
    Avatar photoGingertipster
    Participant
    • Total Posts 33116

    “BBC News, “Kremlin says President Putin’s nuclear alert was a response to a statement made by the British Foreign Secretary.”

    So the Kremlin are desperate to find an excuse for their “nuclear alert” and the British Left wing / anti-Conservatives are desperate to believe Putin rather than the Conservative foreign minister. :wacko:

    Value Is Everything
    #1585174
    Richard88
    Participant
    • Total Posts 2888

    https://nitter.net/pic/media%2FFMqiGBFXEAQvA3O.jpg%3Fname%3Dorig

    Excellent cartoon from the Murdoch Times of all places.

    #1585175
    Avatar photoGingertipster
    Participant
    • Total Posts 33116

    That is funny Richard. :yes:

    Value Is Everything
    #1585187
    Avatar photoBigG
    Participant
    • Total Posts 13286

    Ah, it was so obvious Ginge that it went right over my head.
    I’ll obviously have to work on my reading between the lines
    of unspoken words. Jeez, more work to do :mail:

    PS, I’ve managed to find my old ouija board, that should come in handy :good:

    #1585189
    Avatar photoBigG
    Participant
    • Total Posts 13286

    I did have a chortle Richard :yes:

    #1585190
    Avatar photoTonge
    Participant
    • Total Posts 3003

    “So the Kremlin are desperate to find an excuse for their “nuclear alert” and the British Left wing / anti-Conservatives are desperate to believe Putin rather than the Conservative foreign minister”

    No, of course nobody believes Putin. The point is that Truss’s incompetence offered him a distraction. That’s what you get for sending an imbecile like her into a sensitive diplomatic situation. Her comments & lack of understanding during her visit were embarrassing and yet again the UK is an international laughing stock.

    #1585191
    Avatar photoBigG
    Participant
    • Total Posts 13286

    Spot on Tonge, it’s got nothing to do with left or right. When you’re a
    blethering idiot, you’re a blethering idiot.

Viewing 17 posts - 579 through 595 (of 1,195 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.