The home of intelligent horse racing discussion
The home of intelligent horse racing discussion

The Shergar Cup – is it really any good, or just propoganda?

Home Forums Horse Racing The Shergar Cup – is it really any good, or just propoganda?

Viewing 17 posts - 69 through 85 (of 164 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #409598
    Avatar photoGingertipster
    Participant
    • Total Posts 34704

    Come on Nathan, do I have to be consistent? Consistency belongs to the obsessive compulsive.Every case is different.These jockeys were invited to make the festival work,guests so to speak.It was supposed to be a fun affair.Hughesie rode in India for the winter,making a living.Different situation different rules.

    So what you’re saying Andyod is: The overseas jockeys should be allowed to hit their horse in any way they like, where as the British based riders need to keep to the rules. :roll:

    I am sure all riders would’ve been made aware of our rules. If they come over here (for any race) they need to abide by them or face the consequences.

    Or may be our jockeys should be allowed to race under British interference rules in the Breeders Cup? :lol:

    I was disappointed in Ms Sutherland’s style, all whip and little push.

    Value Is Everything
    #409602
    Avatar photostevecaution
    Blocked
    • Total Posts 8241

    Deliciously appropriate that the final winner on the card was MINCE

    Thanks for the good crack. Time for me to move on. Be lucky.

    #409615
    Avatar photoitsawar
    Member
    • Total Posts 213

    I think that chantal sutherland has been a very naughty girl and needs a good firm telling off!

    #409617
    Avatar photoricky lake
    Blocked
    • Total Posts 3003

    Ok , I have made my feelings known about the racing part of the shergar debacle , I did ignore it totally

    But ….I have to concede that a load of folks turned up and had a great day out yesterday , so well done them and well done Ascot

    Its hard to knock this event now as it attracts loads of folks who get to see the novel side of racing ,with a concert afterwards , just smashing :D

    Ricky

    #409665
    Avatar photoGingertipster
    Participant
    • Total Posts 34704

    Back to the other discussion on the cup – I didn’t seen anything resembling team tactics this afternoon – the only ride worthy of a "mention in despatches" was Haley’s on John Biscuit – which wasn’t the smartest ride of the afternoon

    I do wonder whether Murtagh employed

    team tactics

    in the 2:40 "Classic" Paul. Going off strongly and

    clear

    from an early stage… To benifit his two "countrymen"? Both Last Shadow and Sun Central held up for a late run. Former didn’t show his form but latter

    won

    . Sun Central is

    not normally

    held up so far off the pace and

    stays 1m4f well

    . Did the winner’s jockey

    know

    it would be a

    strong

    pace? Had the pace been

    slow

    then Doyle would’ve been in the

    wrong

    position, probably not having enough

    speed

    in the final stages to get involved. Prussian is a natural front/prominent-runner, but there was

    no

    reason to make it such a

    stamina

    test at 1m4f – On his

    first start

    at the distance and

    far from certain to stay

    .

    Not saying it was

    definitely

    "team tactics", but it would’ve been to Prussian’s advantage to make a slow pace (having speed to win at a

    mile

    this season). Yet Murtagh chose to go off fast. Had I been Prussian’s owner or trainer I’d be asking

    serious questions

    of Murtagh. As far as doing his best to win it was a

    stupid

    ride.

    Value Is Everything
    #409681
    % MAN
    Participant
    • Total Posts 5104

    Back to the other discussion on the cup – I didn’t seen anything resembling team tactics this afternoon – the only ride worthy of a "mention in despatches" was Haley’s on John Biscuit – which wasn’t the smartest ride of the afternoon

    I do wonder whether Murtagh employed

    team tactics

    in the 2:40 "Classic" Paul. Going off strongly and

    clear

    from an early stage… To benifit his two "countrymen"? Both Last Shadow and Sun Central held up for a late run. Former didn’t show his form but latter

    won

    . Sun Central is

    not normally

    held up so far off the pace and

    stays 1m4f well

    . Did the winner’s jockey

    know

    it would be a

    strong

    pace? Had the pace been

    slow

    then Doyle would’ve been in the

    wrong

    position, probably not having enough

    speed

    in the final stages to get involved. Prussian is a natural front/prominent-runner, but there was

    no

    reason to make it such a

    stamina

    test at 1m4f – On his

    first start

    at the distance and

    far from certain to stay

    .

    Not saying it was

    definitely

    "team tactics", but it would’ve been to Prussian’s advantage to make a slow pace (having speed to win at a

    mile

    this season). Yet Murtagh chose to go off fast. Had I been Prussian’s owner or trainer I’d be asking

    serious questions

    of Murtagh. As far as doing his best to win it was a

    stupid

    ride.

    Apart from his previous run at Goodwood, Prussian ran as he has in previous races. Most of Johnston’s runners set the pace so I would be surprised if he was pissed off with the run.

    Not sure you could emphatically say Sun Central "stays 1m 4f well" with only one previous run over the distance where he had to be driven quite hard. Being unexposed it is no great surprise if connections are still experimenting with tactics.

    Sun Central was one of only two runners in the race to attract support and had been well touted in advance.

    #409701
    Avatar photoGingertipster
    Participant
    • Total Posts 34704

    Apart from his previous run at Goodwood, Prussian ran as he has in previous races. Most of Johnston’s runners set the pace so I would be surprised if he was pissed off with the run.

    Not sure you could emphatically say Sun Central "stays 1m 4f well" with only one previous run over the distance where he had to be driven quite hard. Being unexposed it is no great surprise if connections are still experimenting with tactics.

    Sun Central was one of only two runners in the race to attract support and had been well touted in advance.

    I’d have expected Prussian to lead Paul, but not at such a fast pace. Why go so far clear? Murtagh went too fast for his (Prussian’s) own good.

    When Sun Central ran that "one previous run" Paul, all those around him came from further back. Staying power enabled him to finish second. Hence why I said "stays 1m4f well", improving as stamina is tested. Not surprised Sun Central was well backed/won, it’s just he’s suited by a test at the trip. So had there not been a strong pace he’d have been in the wrong position. Of course if the jockey knew there’d be a strong pace… :wink:

    Value Is Everything
    #409723
    Avatar photoMiss Woodford
    Participant
    • Total Posts 1704

    Come on Nathan, do I have to be consistent? Consistency belongs to the obsessive compulsive.Every case is different.These jockeys were invited to make the festival work,guests so to speak.It was supposed to be a fun affair.Hughesie rode in India for the winter,making a living.Different situation different rules.

    So what you’re saying Andyod is: The overseas jockeys should be allowed to hit their horse in any way they like, where as the British based riders need to keep to the rules. :roll:

    I am sure all riders would’ve been made aware of our rules. If they come over here (for any race) they need to abide by them or face the consequences.

    Or may be our jockeys should be allowed to race under British interference rules in the Breeders Cup? :lol:

    I was disappointed in Ms Sutherland’s style, all whip and little push.

    Chantal has always been too eager to use the whip. I believe she’s had at least one whip infraction in the US (which requires some effort).

    #26552
    eddie case
    Member
    • Total Posts 1214

    Not tips for the individual races but your positives and negatives of the competition as a whole?

    And what would you do to improve it?

    #487815
    insomniac
    Participant
    • Total Posts 1453

    A daft concept, but what really annoys me is the over-the-top faux-excitement that the TV presenters try and generate. No one really gives a ??it about the "teams", do they?

    How to improve it? Run the daft event at different tracks around the country – that might just generate enthusiasm amongst non-racing fans. Try Ayr, Catterick, Bath or Chepstow.

    #487822
    Avatar photoIan
    Participant
    • Total Posts 525

    There are no positives, it’s **** and gimmicky. Racing is NOT a team sport and never will be. I totally ignore this stupid meeting.

    #487826
    Salty
    Participant
    • Total Posts 48

    Personally, I hate it, but, and it is a fairly big but, I suppose you could argue that there is a place in the calendar for such an event.
    Can’t stand the over the top media coverage though.

    #487830
    Avatar photoThe Young Fella
    Blocked
    • Total Posts 2064

    The Shergar Cup is nonsense as far as I’m concerned. It fails in its efforts to be a worthwhile weekend betting event, properly commemorate Shergar or interest the public.

    #487833
    Avatar photoIan
    Participant
    • Total Posts 525

    This is "racing" trying to cater for "the general public". Truth is if you put a good concert on the general public would turn up anyway even for a card of sellers.

    Real racing enthusiasts do not want to know about the Shergar cup. Pointless event!

    #487841
    Avatar photobetlarge
    Participant
    • Total Posts 2806

    We have this debate every year.

    This afternoon, Ascot will host a big crowd with loads of newcomers to racing – particularly youngsters – enjoying a rare, or maybe first-time, day out at the races.

    For

    one

    afternoon of

    one

    day in the year, racing tries something different, something original, that gets widespread positive media coverage. The response is typically overwhelmingly negative.

    Shall I tell you what ‘real’ racing fans want? They want to moan like buggery about everything. It’s unbelievable.

    Anyway, if you are going to Ascot, have a great time – everyone else there will be!

    Mike

    #487842
    Avatar photoIan
    Participant
    • Total Posts 525

    We have this debate every year.

    This afternoon, Ascot will host a big crowd with loads of newcomers to racing – particularly youngsters – enjoying a rare, or maybe first-time, day out at the races.

    For

    one

    afternoon of

    one

    day in the year, racing tries something different, something original, that gets widespread positive media coverage. The response is typically overwhelmingly negative.

    Shall I tell you what ‘real’ racing fans want? They want to moan like buggery about everything. It’s unbelievable.

    Anyway, if you are going to Ascot, have a great time – everyone else there will be!

    Mike

    And how many of those newcomers will return

    for the racing

    or understand who is favourite for next years 2000 Guineas and why and therefore convert to being a racing enthusiast?

    None. Totally pointless!

    #487844
    Avatar photophil walker
    Participant
    • Total Posts 1374

    Can’t stand the event but personally feel if the old C4 team were covering it: Derek Thompson, John McCririck and Mike Cattermole they would make it enjoyable viewing. Watching Lord Snooty going over the top about it on the Morning Line was embarrassing & cringing.

Viewing 17 posts - 69 through 85 (of 164 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.