Balding Treadwell apology

[Craig Braddick]

Black Americans have often voted for the Democratic Party. In the 1968 Presidential Election 92% of black americans voted for the Democratic Party candidate.

He wasn’t black.

That’s very true…Also one of the nominees who had a huge campaign for the Republican spot was a white man who clearly did not like the civil rights movement and had strong ties in his political campaign to influential Republicans who were also members of the Mormon Church who at the time openly practiced racism, sanctioned by God, as to who could become a member of good standing in their church.

Craig

[strawbear]

here’s an easter sex tip

if you’re into inflatable dolls, get the muslim version

they blow themselves up.

this has nothing to do with clare balding what so ever.

[Cav]

Distinct lack of moderation on TRF at the moment.

[Getzippy]

I’m just on my way out Craig, but I’ll try to reply to your request later. I’ve nothing against you as a person – I don’t know you – but I was saddened that you appear to have shot yourself in the foot. However, God loves a sinner and I’m sure you’ll overcome a little local difficulty.
Bye for now.
Ken

Well, If we’re going to throw in the God thing as well, we may as well give up talking rationally, let alone deal with reality.

Zip

[Getzippy]

Can someone explain how a thread for a gap toothed jockey and a fat rug muncher has gone on to religion please?

Errr, excuse me, Neil – I think you’ll find the correct terminology for a larger person is "generously proportioned."

But she is a bean flicker, agreed.

Zip

[Getzippy]

What’s a "collectivist"?

Colin

Collectivist is used in opposition to individualist.

Collectivist would apply to Plato, Socialists, Communists, Fascists and the Co-Op.

Would also apply to the kibbutzes in Israel.

The good of society leads to the subjugation of the individual.

The basic feature is that the means of production are owned collectively rather than by individuals.

Geez, and I’ve always loved their chocolate.

That’s the Co-op, not the communists.

Zip

[Getzippy]

Distinct lack of moderation on TRF at the moment.

Which would explain the entertaining nature of this thread.

Not to mention the size…Oooo, matron etc

Zip

[Ugly Mare]

Can someone explain how a thread for a gap toothed jockey and a fat rug muncher has gone on to religion please?

Errr, excuse me, Neil – I think you’ll find the correct terminology for a larger person is "generously proportioned."

But she is a bean flicker, agreed.

Zip

…not very nice. A desperate attempt to appeal to one’s own peer group I suppose.

Is it any wonder few women bother to write on here these days.

[Ken(West Derby)]

Craig,
As you seem so intent on getting a further response from me, having PM’d me as follows:-
…….Because I have publicly said on here I do not like Barack Obama and why I would exercise my right to defend my family, how does this make me a right wing neo-con extremist monster?
Craig: Re your question above. Why are you raising this with me? There is not one word or sentence there that relates to anything I posted. So in that respect there is nothing for me to retract or apologise for, is there?

Craig,
You then raised the following question last night:-

Tell me, what is unreasonable about my views, because I truly am not getting this. I don’t claim for one moment to be a political and social issues expert on the UK, yet plenty of UK people on this forum seem to be expert on US social and political issues despite never (in most cases) have lived here.
I truly do not understand your point about others would not even think, hold or express the views I have.
So, please tell me, what is it I have said, and be specific, so I can at least understand where you and others are coming from.

Craig: Sorry I’ve not been able to respond before now but here again I really don’t see the point in raising this issue with me. I can’t recall mentioning politics, religion, or ethnicity in any of my posts. So in that respect there is nothing to retract or apologise for, is there?

Craig,
You then post the following in the Lounge:-

………. or told you are bigoted (something someone in the other thread has still not explained or retracted)

Craig: I am more than happy to stand by the following satement I made yesterday: ….I am sure that I am not alone in wishing that Craig had kept his bigoted opinions to himself
Now if you don’t agree that the statement below made by yourself bears all the hallmarks of a bigot then we’ll just have to agree to disagree. So in that respect there is nothing for me to retract or apologise for, is there?

I have no time for Obama. he is a two faced leech of a man, a discreduit to the USA, (bowing down to the Saudi’s, apologizing for no reason and being unable to say a sentence without umming and erring. A pitiful pathetic man, with twisted religious beliefs, on the fringe of associating with terrorists and black supremecy groups throughout his lifetime. A totally unsuitable man (and man is a generous term, here) with a hideous wife, together they are hideous representatives of our country intent on taxing us into oblivion to feed the government welfare programs while strangling peoples chance at the American dream in the name of their elitist version of equality which only works for those of a similar mind to them.

Unfortunately, for some perverse reason you seem to be unable to take on board what myself and others, including Maxillon5, have tried to get across to you, i.e. your public comments will jeopardise your career in race commentating. Either you want to be a full-time professional race caller or else you’re just playing at it. If it’s the latter then go ahead air your views on whatever takes your fancy. Personally, I don’t give a sh**e what views you hold or those of whatever President you have in office. They are of no significance whatsoever to me.
Asking a question is much different than making an presumptive statement… Almost always bigotry is neither scholarly nor intelligent and almost always presumptive.

[Spitfire]

Indeed Ugly Mare this forum has a higher hate per post ratio than the betfair forum.

We will see an openly gay premiership footballer before we see an openly gay jockey. No wonder the sport is shrinking and will continue to shrink.

[Gerald]

1981-85

[Gerald]

Distinct lack of moderation on TRF at the moment.

I think Cormack is developing headaches drawing up the shortlists for the Inaugural TRF Hall Of Fame nominees, and writing the blurbs on them.

[Ken(West Derby)]

Getzippy wrote in one post:
Well, If we’re going to throw in the God thing as well, we may as well give up talking rationally, let alone deal with reality.

Then proceeds to begin another post:
Geez, and I’ve always loved their chocolate.

So let’s get this straight Getzippy? On the one hand you say the use of the word God is irrational and unreal, yet a short while later you rely on Jesus to make a statement.

Seems to me you don’t know your a..e from your elbow. Talk about contradictions…….

[Getzippy]

Can someone explain how a thread for a gap toothed jockey and a fat rug muncher has gone on to religion please?

Errr, excuse me, Neil – I think you’ll find the correct terminology for a larger person is "generously proportioned."

But she is a bean flicker, agreed.

Zip

…not very nice. A desperate attempt to appeal to one’s own peer group I suppose.

Is it any wonder few women bother to write on here these days.

Well, I’m a woman.

Maybe that makes me a bad woman?

Zip

[Getzippy]

Getzippy wrote in one post:
Well, If we’re going to throw in the God thing as well, we may as well give up talking rationally, let alone deal with reality.

Then proceeds to begin another post:
Geez, and I’ve always loved their chocolate.

So let’s get this straight Getzippy? On the one hand you say the use of the word God is irrational and unreal, yet a short while later you rely on Jesus to make a statement.

Seems to me you don’t know your a..e from your elbow. Talk about contradictions…….

Ken, I’m too thick to understand the contradiction I made. Why did I rely
on Jesus in my statement you referred too?…please SPELL it out for me so I can reply.

Thanks,

Zip

[Onthesteal]

. The remark was joke and taken as such by the parties involved

Nonsense. Not true.

At what point did you see Treadwell or anybody else laugh? I must have missed the punchline I guess.

I did, however, witness Liam dying inside in front of millions of viewers; a reaction to without doubt the most ill judged, insensitive joke (your interpretation) I’ve ever heard on TV IMO, and somewhat prolonged by her pig headed ignorance and failure to notice him squirming before her very eyes.

Totally unforgivable and if you think Treadwell’s forgiven her or ever will for that matter, you’re barking. How did the apology go I wonder?…

Hang her? No, of course not, but somewhere between that and putting a padlock on her fridge would suffice.

[Ken(West Derby)]

Getzippy wrote:
Ken, I’m too thick to understand the contradiction I made. Why did I rely
on Jesus in my statement you referred too?…please SPELL it out for me so I can reply.

Getzippy, okay I’ll spell it out…….

EUPHEMISM

Hope that explains things, Getzippy.

[Author]

Posts