The home of intelligent horse racing discussion
The home of intelligent horse racing discussion

Ultimate Nightmare

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 17 posts - 290 through 306 (of 325 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Admiral Rous -WFA Scale #77995
    Avatar photoUltimate Nightmare
    Member
    • Total Posts 326

    Quote: from Prufrock on 10:49 am on Sep. 27, 2006[br]

    Someone once said to me that in addition to a weight-for-age scale there should be a weight-for-experience scale: a horse could be allowed, say, 7 lb on its debut, 4 lb on its next run…and so on.  

    Discuss.<br>

    Surely experience? would depend on how ready a horse was to race when it gets to a racecourse, some are more ready than others. How would you differentiate.

    in reply to: Books for Christmas. #77716
    Avatar photoUltimate Nightmare
    Member
    • Total Posts 326

    Colourful characters are OK but you have to abide by the rules, especially when specifically asked to do so. Shame it had to go that far, surely forcing them to read one of J24’s Articles would have been enough punishment.:biggrin:  

    <br>only joking! J24 ;)

    in reply to: Naps Comp  Day 23 #86443
    Avatar photoUltimate Nightmare
    Member
    • Total Posts 326

    NAP NR EARLIER  

    3.55 N Proposal

    in reply to: Fibresand Poundage allowance #77807
    Avatar photoUltimate Nightmare
    Member
    • Total Posts 326

    Pru, i’m still bemused. most of the races use a large part of the straight @Southwell and in the longer races they are travelling wide’ish around the bend.

    If there is a discrepancy in the distance lets get onto HQ and give them some grief, :biggrin:  it’s not good enough, we put up with enough **** as it is.

    I had wondered about the Southwell timings @ 5 but i only started using their figures more recently.

    in reply to: Fibresand Poundage allowance #77798
    Avatar photoUltimate Nightmare
    Member
    • Total Posts 326

    Quote: from Prufrock on 12:46 am on Sep. 26, 2006[br]* There is convincing evidence to suggest that 5f races at Southwell are, at least some of the time, run over about 4f 205 yds.

    Why?

    in reply to: Naps Comp  Day 23 #86429
    Avatar photoUltimate Nightmare
    Member
    • Total Posts 326

    n.2.10 Millachy

    in reply to: why slate the classic generation #77910
    Avatar photoUltimate Nightmare
    Member
    • Total Posts 326

    Quote: from empty wallet on 8:55 pm on Sep. 25, 2006[br]

    <br>Can anyone name me a GOOD  older Miller?

    <br>

    <br>Best i can come up with with is windy miller from camberwick green. :)

    in reply to: More errors to go in the form book #77751
    Avatar photoUltimate Nightmare
    Member
    • Total Posts 326

    I’ve just had a horrible thought that would devastate racing as we know it, Ascot may have produced the PERFECT FLAT RACING SURFACE.

    in reply to: More errors to go in the form book #77750
    Avatar photoUltimate Nightmare
    Member
    • Total Posts 326

    At Doncaster a couple of years ago when course records were appearing one after the other on suposedly good ground. It was explained as a springy effect if i remember correctly, occurring after rain. If Ascot is draining extremely fast maybe just enough moisture is being left behind to produce such an effect?

    More plausible than Alien interference or the stalls being placed in the wrong place! ;)

    in reply to: More errors to go in the form book #77749
    Avatar photoUltimate Nightmare
    Member
    • Total Posts 326

    The inability of the officials to give a correct assesment of the going is my main hates in racing. That’s why i thought the aw would rectify this being a constant surface. Now this has been interfered with as well. There are enough imponderables in racing without the COURSE Officials not knowing what’s happening. :angry:

    in reply to: More errors to go in the form book #77748
    Avatar photoUltimate Nightmare
    Member
    • Total Posts 326

    Thats my point the course has been used more now than at the royal meeting.

    in reply to: More errors to go in the form book #77747
    Avatar photoUltimate Nightmare
    Member
    • Total Posts 326

    Would the racing have compacted the soil with racing, quickening it further? Its not as if the the pace wasn’t there at the royal meeting.

    in reply to: More errors to go in the form book #77744
    Avatar photoUltimate Nightmare
    Member
    • Total Posts 326

    Not officially as quick as brighton, from good 1&2 to GS after race 2 yet back to good by race 6 & 7 :biggrin:

    in reply to: Naps Comp   Day 22 #86393
    Avatar photoUltimate Nightmare
    Member
    • Total Posts 326

    Tilsworth Charlie B.530

    in reply to: More errors to go in the form book #77740
    Avatar photoUltimate Nightmare
    Member
    • Total Posts 326

    Oooops! that theories dead, 1st race was one of the quick ones, what about York last year when then the top was flying off yet still excellent times. It’s all a bit wierd.:o

    in reply to: More errors to go in the form book #77739
    Avatar photoUltimate Nightmare
    Member
    • Total Posts 326

    So, i must assume it was wet or had just rained before race 1, water was still  in the ground, hence soft. After that the water drained away and nobody noticed? :biggrin:

    in reply to: More errors to go in the form book #77737
    Avatar photoUltimate Nightmare
    Member
    • Total Posts 326

    Agreed totally different now. Amazing looking track IMO. drainage should take away extremes of ground. I’m still using the old times adjusted (to the magic FORMULA:biggrin: )untill i have enough data.

Viewing 17 posts - 290 through 306 (of 325 total)