- This topic has 78 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 1 month ago by
.
- Posts
About the backing and laying of horses. I think Ham backed it at a huge price and laid off at a smaller price, reducing his risk or even guarantee a profit no matter what the result. When it works its brilliant
At least that’s how I read it.
Thats basically it, was guaranteed profit and labaik winning was just about the best result i could have had…. melon did do better than i thought though and im extremely glad labaik decided to start… had a nibble on him in the morning at 33s as a side bet as i do like a few peoples suggestions on here! And had river wylde e/w on the day in the shop…. about the only race so far thats went that way!!
It works brilliant when you get it right but it does involve luck of course, always lay them off if you have the chance…
Neptune was nearly a disaster though but lets not get into that
But only nearly, right? you never lose, right?
Dont know where you get that from i gave you two examples of losers in this thread and i made it clear on here i thought neon wolf would walk the neptune…. i think you have an issue
Just because it wasnt a disaster dosent mean i didnt lose, it just means i didnt have a disaster…. and trust me, i nearly had a disaster LOL
And to add to that ive also made it clear i think UKWIMH will walk the stayers, which you refuted, so if he loses theres another loser lol
And no unfortunately i dont have UKWIMH in big prices, 2/1 MAX mainly 7/4 and no im not green in the book so its UNWIMH or nothing
…..But only nearly, right? you never lose, right?
Dont know where you get that from i gave you two examples of losers in this thread and i made it clear on here i thought neon wolf would walk the neptune…. i think you have an issue
Just because it wasnt a disaster dosent mean i didnt lose, it just means i didnt have a disaster…. and trust me, i nearly had a disaster LOL
I think you are right.
But only nearly, right? you never lose, right?
Dont know where you get that from i gave you two examples of losers in this thread and i made it clear on here i thought neon wolf would walk the neptune…. i think you have an issue
Just because it wasnt a disaster dosent mean i didnt lose, it just means i didnt have a disaster…. and trust me, i nearly had a disaster LOL
I think you are right.
Well maybe I have an “issue” with the amount of aftertimers that seem to have appeared on this forum of late, like Charlie and Ham who claim never to lose.
Even when you lose a bet you’ve got some sort of bookies concession which means you haven’t really lost, or if you tell us about a losing bet you’ll qualify this with “but at least I won heavily on this race later which meant I was well up on the day”
Sad that even on a forum where everyone is a stranger people still can’t be honest.
I’ve gave you 3 examples of losers already lol what more do you want ?and I haven’t spoken about anything in a monetary sense so you have no idea where I stand…..
just because you did your bollocks on melon and Yanworth doesn’t mean you need to go around accusing people of absolute nonsense, and I must add if you look at the daily bet threads started by Charlie you’d see that he has clearly stated what he’s won and lost on lol
go away and cry on your own son your trying to prove something that can’t be proven as BOTH of us have clearly listed winners and losers….
Ham it’s amusing that you accuse me of having serious issues.
Especially when judging by your replies it’s clear that you’re somebody with seriously low self-esteem. Aftertiming, bigging yourself up on a continual basis, are just some of your crimes. Clearly you feel an intense need to prove yourself to people you have never met, is top of your list of priorities, rather than actually putting in some constructive input (if you were even capable of doing so)
Tbh I don’t remember either you or Charlie1987 ever saying insightful about a horse race. All you two want to talk about is your winning bets and you quickly forget about any losing ones. For example yesterday I was trying to get a discussion going about future targets for neptune horses, but all Charlie1987 wanted to do was go on and on like an attention seeking schoolgirl about how he had backed the winner. Conveniently as well forgetting about how he had tipped Finian’s oscar earlier in the thread (which was also an aftertiming bet, only put up when he went into clear favouritism.)
Then again anyone who lists their year of birth in their username tends to be a numpty by default.
Good luck you two, you clearly deserve each other.
Unfortunately this forum, which used to be a useful source of discussion about horse racing, is now overrunning with aftertimers and chronically insecure people. Goodbye.I’ve provided a fair few pieces of information that wouldn’t have been available as quickly if I wasn’t in the position to receive it…… done from a point of view where I was hoping that people might be able to nick a price or two before they shortened …
how you interpret what I post is upto you my friend…..
I think Defi du suel and Mega Fortune are lay material in the Triumph. With conditions set to be quicker on the new course,they can be taken on with the likes of Bapaume, Charlie Parcs and Landofhopeandglory. I’ll stick my neck on the line and say that Defi Du Suel may become the latest big gun to miss the fesival.
Good work me. Just 1st and 2nd in the Triumph. I think i’ll take up stamp collecting
Unfortunately this forum, which used to be a useful source of discussion about horse racing, is now overrunning with aftertimers and chronically insecure people. Goodbye.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.