Home › Forums › Horse Racing › Ruk coverage of Royal Ascot ……. what do we think ??
- This topic has 36 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 7 months ago by
yeats.
- AuthorPosts
- September 15, 2014 at 20:28 #490336
Each to their own but I find Matt hugely entertaining and his Sunday forum with the likes of Chris cook a real treat. Mcririck is annoying with his constant interrupting of others but usually makes a lot of valid points. Ruk I find very patronising as somebody who has a good knowledge of horses and breeding find atr, with a few exceptions, entertaining and informative. All about opinions though.
September 17, 2014 at 14:08 #490408James Willoghby had a little "Ricky Lake" dig at ATR this afternoon he was trying to explain why horses start at lower grades tracks and used "Ffos Las" as an example then said "nothing against Ffos Las I could have said… Brighton… Southwell…Lingfield….Wolverhampton…" silent pause before continuing his conversation.
It was obvious from his manner he was having a dig at the tracks who don’t appear on RUK.
September 17, 2014 at 15:00 #490411James Willoghby had a little "Ricky Lake" dig at ATR this afternoon he was trying to explain why horses start at lower grades tracks and used "Ffos Las" as an example then said "nothing against Ffos Las I could have said… Brighton… Southwell…Lingfield….Wolverhampton…" silent pause before continuing his conversation.
It was obvious from his manner he was having a dig at the tracks who don’t appear on RUK.
It sounded to me Steve like he picked Ffos Las totally at random and was fed the others by a "comedian" down his earpiece.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.