- This topic has 211 replies, 30 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 5 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
It’s not about proving things 100%, it’s just about being realistic and not making claims that require huge amounts of evidence to be ignored in favour of circumstance. If the forum was full of posts liks:<br> <br>"Sir Percy is a sprinter because he once won over 6f"
"Les Arcs should go hurdling because he didn’t fall when he ran at Cartmel"
or
"Norse Dancer should not have been retired, he’s definitely got a Group 1 in him"
it wouldn’t be much fun!
- Total Posts 17716
Quote: from davidjohnson on 11:41 am on Oct. 27, 2006[br]Presumably the point is that we can all sit here suggesting things all day, but without any evidence to support such suggestions, it does tend to weaken them somehwat.<br>
Which pretty well sums up most of this enormous thread.:biggrin: <br> As your namesake once said about a second marriage " It is a triumph for hope over experience".<br>R.I.P., Bulwark.
<br>Wouldn’t it be great if all racing arguments were settled like that?
If meetings were abandoned, connections of all the horses set to run could simply drop their trousers in the parade ring, take a glance up and down the line, and then announce the results.
It would make the world a better place.
I think you win an award for the ‘most viewed thread in ages’! Something that gets a discussion going is always worth it. (I think!):)
Sorry I just couldnt help it….:biggrin: :biggrin: :biggrin:
Oh to be right, now that looked like a high 120s/130 performance to me. And the horses that were supposedly going to progress past him never materialised.
Backed him at 12s and 10s over the winter. Im going out tonight.
Plus scorpion 14/1 at 1m4f yesterday, what a weekend!
Sir percy went well yesterday reet….
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.