Home › Forums › Archive Topics › Trends, Research And Notebooks › Racing "Inside Information" and how it is secretly
- This topic has 244 replies, 52 voices, and was last updated 19 years, 4 months ago by
Seagull.
- AuthorPosts
- December 9, 2006 at 13:51 #32510
I’ll tell you what Alan, I’ll give you one last chance. What will win the 2:05 at Cheltenham please?
December 9, 2006 at 14:02 #32511Look, I can do it too…
12.55 Cheltenham<br>Kalca Mome triple BODD-M with anthrax-related boolean betting signs, using moneyfart turd-u-like double-blank tosstalk (see Womans Realm Jan 1991 pp63-258 incl). Skated home at 9-2.
And second horse Bohemian Spirit, mankeyodds from (Code Tables 9-7 to 991 CRUDD-M as detailed) steamship whistlefart tinkle-the-ivories bottyslapper for the forecast.
Everyone, OK?
Disclosure Protocol [YAMPY]
Mike<br>
December 9, 2006 at 14:05 #32512FlatSeasonLover writes:<br>“I’ll tell you what Alan, I’ll give you one last chance. What will win the 2:05 at Cheltenham please?â€ÂÂ
December 9, 2006 at 14:18 #32513Haha
December 9, 2006 at 14:30 #32514What trust is earned by giving us winners after the race has been run? As betlarge has proved, he too has the force with him.
Boo Ridley is a conman, with little grasp of reality and, I assume, brains in the anal region. A non-sensical crackpot, who will seemingly milk a free site for all the publicity he can.
I’ve just given Daisy a call at Belmarsh, and he’d like Alan’s measurements – just so he can work out how much to charge as his star attraction. He’s even come up with a slogan:
"Come and riddle Alan, the cryptographic b*tch…"
Should generate plenty of interest, I’m told. Alan will be walking like a Spanish coach driver in no time.
December 9, 2006 at 14:43 #32515The TRF,
2:05 Cheltenham ‘Don’t push It’ win<br>Who did not see…
KAP  ’10/11′ (cyclically 11/10 falseodds)<br>D.Record ‘11/10′<br>Scot.D.Mirror – ditto<br>Racing Post – ‘4/5’ (45, the most important betting code number!) and even returned Keyodds ‘8/11’ cyclic<br>AR
December 9, 2006 at 14:47 #32516Still not doing yourself any favours, Columbo, so why don’t you do us all one and sod off back to your home planet.
If they’ll take you, of course.
December 9, 2006 at 14:58 #32517I asked you for the winner before the race not after it. I thought you were having a rest this afternoon? Please don’t let us stop you.
December 9, 2006 at 14:59 #325182:40 Cheltenham ‘Exotic Dancer’ win
Remember ‘backdoor’ Keyodds are the hard copy front half of the Neural Correlates Rotation of Betting Odds.
The second most important betting odds number is 55 (see Table 8)
11/2 (550)
‘Exotic Dancer’ was ’11/2′ in each of the racing pages here mentioned. It does not get any more nailed on than that.
Warning,  with ’11/2′ now so highly visible its loss rotation is now active.
AR
December 9, 2006 at 15:04 #32519:shrug:
December 9, 2006 at 15:22 #32520Strange how two of those winners were top rated here (Katchit and Exotic Dancer). Does that make me one of the Cartel?
I have an interest in the 3.45 at Cheltenham. Who do you think will win it? Suggestions before 3.44 if you please.
December 9, 2006 at 15:24 #32521Neural Correlates<br>As stated, ’11/2′ on its loss cycle came in third (3:00 Market Razen, ‘Exstoto’ ’11/2′ 3rd)
Note that the winner of this race was KAP ’12/1′ (columnar, Code Table 6), and triple blank in the rest of the racing pages.<br>AR
December 9, 2006 at 15:29 #32522All
The guy’s just a nutter taking the p*ss out of us.
Shall we stop replying now?
I’ll make this my last post on the subject if all agree.
Mike
December 9, 2006 at 15:34 #32523Agree
December 9, 2006 at 15:48 #32524Malc Smith writes:<br>“Strange how two of those winners were top rated here (Katchit and Exotic Dancer).â€ÂÂ
December 9, 2006 at 15:50 #32525About time cormack ‘does the just thing’ and removes this a*sewipe, me thinks.
Oh, and I agree :biggrin:
December 9, 2006 at 15:59 #32526Just read the 2.05 comment and I see that you didn’t mention FLIGHT LEADER anywhere.
(Edited by Malc Smith at 4:23 pm on Dec. 9, 2006)
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.