- This topic has 244 replies, 52 voices, and was last updated 19 years, 4 months ago by
.
- Posts
I like this bit from the disclaimer on the site
"While we try to include accurate information on the site, we’re not promising you it’s accurate. In fact, we’re not promising you anything except fun and entertainment. So if you use stuff on the site, you’re using it at your own risk. We assume no liability or responsibility for errors or omissions on the site."
Funny that<br>
Update,<br>Ouija Board’s eleventh hour withdrawl from a run at Sha Tin is very suspicious in view of the timing. The author’s Hong Kong contact is severly p**s
ed at the reason why, too: "This morning, much to our surprise, the mare wasn’t quite right. We x-rayed the leg and the damage was unremarkable, but she has jarred herself either on the dirt or the grass and we decided that enough was enough." electric Telegraph and Press association.However, we have no choice but to accept the official reason and move on. Farrier and vet issues were supposed to be avoided on this topic, however, the author is always angry at the mistreatment, however so conducted, of horses. This is an example of getting your disclosure wrong (see Sha Tin ref. 12:23pm, page 11).
No chance to properly study the Monday Dec. 11 ‘backdoor’ yet, hope to do so by Tue-Wed. First indications look KAP heavy. Even on ‘Magnificent Seven’ day they were much lighter in KAP. Remember, when Racing Pages (pseudo) falseodds trumpet, not 20-30 winners’ home, but 20,000-30,000 winners’ home, the Law of Probability is turned on its head.
AR
Wallace and Aragon,<br>The dot.com site which you both refer to is not associated in any way whatsoever with Alan Ridley, the Betting Code or this topic. Period.
As was mentioed earlier, the term "betting code" has surfaced a few times over the years, however, only the Betting Code is cryptographic in nature. Furthermore, this author is replying to your critique squarly and fairly. Traditionally, conmen stay silent or head for the hills.<br>AR
AlanRidley, I put you in the same class as a conman. You spout utter rubbish on here and have had so much free advertising.
You continually evade simple requests from others to put up selections beforee the races. PUT UP OR SHUT UP.
I am amazed this thread is still going.
Maybe I should come round to Mamre Drive and you can show me the code in action in real time??
(Edited by Wallace at 7:56 pm on Dec. 11, 2006)
I’m all for this thread being deleted too, a whole waste of space, no better than the word association threads.
<br>If this doesn’t get deleted then I’d advise everyone not to post in here anymore and the thread will slowly disappear unless Bo Didley keeps talking to himself.
AGAIN, NO " PROOF IN THE PUDDING" IE A SINGLE SELECTION. MR.RIDLEY HOW CAN MY OWN THREAD UNDER  THE "ON AND ON SYSTEM" BE OUT OF JOINT???? ALSO, THE TIMING OF ME JOINING THE FORUM????  ALL I CAN DO IS PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF MY OWN WINNING FORMULA WHICH IS BASED ON THE BETTING MARKET PRIOR TO THE START OF THE EVENT AND NOT AFTER THE EVENT. NOW DID YOU UNDERSTAND  THAT IMPORTANT WORD —– """ PRIOR"""—– I DO BELIEVE THAT ANY SORT OF CLOWN CAN COME UP WITH MUMBO JUMBO AFTER THE EVENT WINNERS,MYSELF INCLUDED IN THE PAST. ONE LAST POINT SIR, HOW DO YOU SPEND YOUR AFTER THE EVENT WINNINGS ?????
I dunno Jim ….. I just keep coming back to this thread.
I think its hilarious and the most action the forum has seen since EC & co left.
However I know that I dont have to come in here if I dont want to….. so see no reason to close it.
Everyone of course is entitled to form their own opinions :)
dave jay has just earned a gold star. Yes, the process (BODD-M) can be modelled in Excel. However, “pretty easilyâ€ÂÂ
Let’s see if I have got this right.
William Hill, Ladbrokes and Corals are no longer in competition with each other but have formed a cartel with the express purpose of taking as much money from the punter as possible.
They use mathematical and probability modelling to predict the likely winner or outcome of an event. This model is very accurate and at times so accurate that the outcome is known with 100% certainty. They also have the clout to fix the outcome of an event.
With this knowledge they then price up the event in such a way as to direct the punter away from the winner so he (or she) places a bet on a false favourite.
So far so good, it might not be true but it is believable.
The cartel also encrypts the winner of the event into the forecasts of various daily newspapers, and later on encrypts the information into the live market.
My question is WHY? What is the point? They have already deluded the punter why publish the name of the winner before the event has taken place, even in encrypted form?
<br>Lightswitch [ON]<br>
For the record I agree with Wallace and Jim and have done since p1.
EDIT: In response to the poster below would you please look at the time of the post – within 10 minutes of the last! Get your facts right before slagging people off David<br>
(Edited by FlatSeasonLover at 2:10 pm on Dec. 12, 2006)
Quote: from FlatSeasonLover on 10:18 pm on Dec. 11, 2006[br]For the record I agree with Wallace and Jim and have done since p1.
Yet strangely you continue to bring the thread back TTT!
They use mathematical and probability modelling to predict the likely winner or outcome of an event. This model is very accurate and at times so accurate that the outcome is known with 100% certainty
<br>Odds compilers best start looking for other employment
Not read alll thread, in fact, hardly any of it, but i can’t believe it’s got to 15 pages long
Well Done Mr Ridley – PMSL
(Edited by empty wallet at 8:53 am on Dec. 12, 2006)
Dolus writes (Dec.11, 10:15pm, page 15):<br>“Let’s see if I have got this right.
â€ÂÂ
Thanks for the reply Alan but you never gave me a gold star like what Dave Jay got. I’m going to throw my toys out of the pram now.
:angry:
Don’t antagonise him too much Dolus. After he’s invaded Russia and Poland he might come after you next!
Quote: from Grasshopper on 3:29 pm on Dec. 12, 2006[br]No f*cker is interested, squire.
Nae luck.
:cool: <br>
<br> DITTO
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.