The home of intelligent horse racing discussion
The home of intelligent horse racing discussion

Handicapping The Race Odds.

Home Forums Archive Topics Trends, Research And Notebooks Handicapping The Race Odds.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #24490
    Avatar photoTheBluesBrother
    Participant
    • Total Posts 1089

    I recently did a Google search for information about THE DARK HORSE SECRET by Weston Fairbanks, who was a successful horse player 30+ years ago in the USA.

    I found the system on sale for $42 and being tight, carried on searching, and on an American forum found a snippet on what the method was about.

    *****************************************************************
    THE DARK HORSE SECRET Weston Fairbanks

    wgt / odds/ # / total

    (1)124 / 3.50 / 20 / 23.50
    (2)124 / 3.75 / 19 / 22.75
    (2)124/ 12.50 / 18 / 30.50
    (3)(5)120 / 2.90 / 16 / 18.90
    (2,3)120 / 7.50 / 15 / 22.50
    (2,3)(5)120 / 8.10 / 14 / 22.10
    (3)(5)114 / 4.90 / 14 / 18.90

    (1) highest weight with lowest odds assigned 20
    (2) same weight as highest, in odds order, -1 incrementally in assignment #
    (3) next weight, subtract diff in weight from 20 to get assigned #
    (4) add odds and # to get total
    (5) play longest odds of 3 lowest total (I changed the rules see example below)

    usually not a good play where all carry same weight.
    *****************************************************************

    The first race I handicapped shown in the example below, it picked out the winner, I thought that’s a good start.

    A couple of days later I handicapped 2 more races and guess what, it came up with 2 winners again, in one of the handicaps it came up with the complete outsider who had no current form, and who’s odds were 16/1 when rating the race, and he later won at 25/1.

    *****************************************************************

    Example: 2.50 Brighton 18/7/13.
    Proofed on another Forum, prior to race being run…

    Blue Deer (IRE) 133 9-7 /8/1/ 20/ 28

    As Blue dear has the top weight of 133 on his own, you award the master rating of 20 (or whatever you want) plus his odds of 8/1 giving him a points total of 20 + 8/1 = 28

    **********************************************************************************************************

    If by any chance you have 3 top weights of 133 you have to place them in odds order i.e

    red 133 4/1
    blue 133 8/1
    yellow 133 20/1

    so you have red with top weight of 20 + 4/1 = 24

    As blue and yellow have joing top weights with red you have to incrementally deduct a pound each from 20.

    Blue 20 -1 (19) + 8/1 = 27
    yellow 20 -2 (18) + 20/1 = 38

    ****************************************************************************************************************

    Squirrel Wood (IRE) 132 9-6 / 4/1/ 19/ 23

    Squirrel Wood has a rating of 132 so you have to subtract from the top weight of 133 which is 1 pound.
    Rating Squirrel Wood you have to subract the 1 pound from the master rating of 20 = 19 then add the odds of 4/1 = 23

    Courageous (IRE) 132 9-6 /14/1/ 18/ 32

    As Courageous has the same weight as Sqirrel Wood who’s weight rating was 19 prior to adding the odds, we now have to subtract 1 pound (the incremental rule) and we end up with a rating of 18 + 14/1 = 32

    Do More Business (IRE) 129 9-3 / 4/1/ 16/ 20

    As Do More Business is weighted on his own at 129 we subtract that weight from the top weight of 133 = 4 pounds, we then subtract the 4 pounds from the master rating of 20 = 16 + 4/1 = 20

    Ridgeway Sapphire 124 8-12 / 7/2/ 11/ 14.5

    Ridgeway Sapphire and Lady Valtas have the same weight of 124 so the incremental rule will apply again.

    For Ridgeway Sapphire subtract 124 from the top weight of 133 = 9 pounds, then subtract 9 pounds from the master

    rating of 20 = 11 + 7/2 = 14.5

    Lady Valtas 124 8-12 / 50/1/ 10/ 60

    As Lady Valtas has the same weight as Ridgeway Pearl we have to use the incremental rule.
    Ridgeway Pearl weight rating was worked out at 11, we subtract 1 pound = 10 + 50/1 = 60

    Otto The First 122 8-10/ 12/1/ 9/ 21

    Otto The First carried a weight of 122 so we have to subtract from the top weight of 133 = 11 pounds, We then subtract the 11 pounds from the master rating of 20 = 9 + 12/1 = 21.

    Copper Rag 118 8-6/ 25/1/ 5/ 30

    Copper Rag carried a weigth of 118 so we subtract from the top weight of 133 = 15 pounds, we then subtract the 15 pounds from the master ratins of 20 = 5 + 25/1 = 30

    Just Isla 117 8-5/ 7/2/ 4/ 7.5

    Just Isla carried a weight of 117, subtract from the top weight of 133 = 16 pounds,
    subtract 16 pounds from the master rating of 20 = 4 + 7/2 = 7.5

    In conclusion, as Just Isla had clearly the lowest rating of 7.5, this had to be the selection (Won 3/1) :D .

    If I handicapped a race and the bottom 3 had ratings of 14.0, 15.0 and 16.0, I would then refer to my speed figures and look at the last 3 speed ratings for each horse, and the horse with highest speed figure becomes the selection 8)

    I wait until about 11.00am and using my Excel scraper, I collect the up-to-date race cards and odds from the Sporting Life website, it only takes a few minutes to rate any race with practise 8)

    TBB.

    #450222
    Avatar photoPurwell
    Participant
    • Total Posts 1618

    Tried this today, complete and utter waste of time, not even close to a winner!

    I've stumbled on the side of twelve misty mountains
    I've walked and I crawled on six crooked highways
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.