The home of intelligent horse racing discussion
The home of intelligent horse racing discussion

Pablo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Derby 2011 #355642
    Pablo
    Member
    • Total Posts 8

    Some Derby observations, not conclusions

    Records go back to Nashwan in 1989

    1. No Derby winner had won over more than 8f as a 2yo

    2. All English-trained winners had the word ‘quickened’ in their RP form comments apart from:
    a) those that didn’t have a prep at 3 (Shaamit & Lammtarra)
    b) those that ran 1st or 2nd in a Guineas (Nashwan & Sir Percy)

    3. 3/4 Irish-trained winners had competed in the Ballysax (1st or 2nd) & won the Derrinstown at Leopardstown, except New Approach (2nd in Guineas)

    4. All winners won their last race except for:
    a) those that were beaten in a Group / Grade 1 over shorter trip on last start (Generous, Dr Devious, Sir Percy & New Approach)
    b) those who placed 2nd to a horse that did not subsequently contest the Derby (Quest For Fame was 2nd to Belmez and Workforce 2nd to Cape Blanco)

    5. All winners had won over 10f or 11f as a 3yo unless:
    a) they did not contest a European 10f+ race at 3 and ran in a Group 1 as a 3yo (Nashwan, Generous, Dr Devious (ran in Kentucky Derby), Sir Percy, New Approach & Sea The Stars)
    b) were unraced at 3 (Shaamit & Lammtarra)
    c) came 2nd over 10f to a horse that did not contest the Derby (Workforce)

    in reply to: Grand National 2010 #274280
    Pablo
    Member
    • Total Posts 8

    In terms of highest RPR-OR the vast majority of runners have >5 lb (most >7lb – it is lifetime best run after all)

    But Butler’s Cabin was 0 lb last year which was enough to put me off (his RPR had been downgraded from 150 to 147 too)

    in reply to: Grand National 2010 #274279
    Pablo
    Member
    • Total Posts 8

    It’s this trends thing – which indicators to rely on and how far back to trust them (and which make sense!)

    I’m not a fan of win & place strike-rate – prefer a horse to have won one or two biggish handicap pots rather than be a place specialist

    Monty’s Pass – Kerry National
    Amberleigh House – Becher 1st, 2nd and 2nd, GN 3rd (Aintree specialist)
    Hedgehunter – Thyestes
    Numbersixvalverde – Theystes, Irish National
    Silver Birch – Becher, Welsh
    COD – Eider off topweight
    Mon Mome – Cheltenham Listed £55k

    in reply to: Grand National 2010 #274271
    Pablo
    Member
    • Total Posts 8

    That’s interesting because on the GN blog many use strike-rate (win & place) as a key indicator

    What you suggest implies that a horse that didn’t win very often but placed frequently (i.e. still a healthy s/r) would not go up that much in the handicap – making it potentially well-in at the weights – i.e. 3rd in the Hennessy and Welsh in the same season would have been largely unpenalised

    Whereas winning another handicap over 3m+ would have led to a penalty

    Yet now, with no slippage, having a high place strike-rate will be penalised more than in the past

    in reply to: Grand National 2010 #274255
    Pablo
    Member
    • Total Posts 8

    Gerald

    Thanks – I’ll try BHA

    in reply to: Grand National 2010 #274226
    Pablo
    Member
    • Total Posts 8

    Meant end of season or end of calendar year

    in reply to: Grand National 2010 #274225
    Pablo
    Member
    • Total Posts 8

    Can anyone let me know what the handicap slippage pre-2003 was all about?

    When did slippage occur and what effect would it have had on GN runners?

    Was it at season’s end, 31st Dec?

    Was it for older horses only?

    Etc

    Any help much appreciated…

    in reply to: 2010 Grand National portfolio #259732
    Pablo
    Member
    • Total Posts 8

    Apologies to Gerald for comments made about your staking plan – inappropriate/lazy choice of words – no offence meant. Good luck with your project – and congratulations on picking the winner last year.

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)