[Dungheap]

Hi  ttt<br>Be interesting to know why you can not proof to the racing post, that should be a thing you could air without litigation.

[Dungheap]

Hi ian and chompy <br>LOL:biggrin:<br>Its not only the actual nepotism but only one view gets thru’.<br>I see many views about horses and all the other aspects of racing, on here, many diametrically opposed its good but I do not see it in the media. Joe public unfortunatly does not see it all.<br>Feel less paranoid now.<br>Nobody likes me……………

[Dungheap]

Good point<br>

[Dungheap]

Thanks rich <br>In my original peice, which was very disorganised, I really meant to say, we have one real trade paper, one terrestial racing channel (the BBC doesn’t count any more) and ATR . That the three main mediums for the information that we the punters use, are populated by the same people. Couple that with the no information, if you have a go, by jockeys trainers owners and the racing government. Means that instead of clear investigive jornalism we have head up A*** views. <br>Even the ones who speak out and damn the consequences, have to watch their ps and qs as per Paul haig on nimello and McCirrick v Savill. I think it is a poor state when these are the only people who will actually have a go. Ever heard Alistair Down have a go at something serious? I can not remember one.  When tommo tried it (top Cees) he got shot down.<br> The government passed laws to allow whistle blowing etc maybe racing should do the same.

[Dungheap]

My reference to Derek Thompson was more that he gives out his opinions on channel 4, and at the same time runs a premium tipping line, does that mean when he tips on channel 4 there is no need to ring his premium line?<br>

[Author]

Posts