- This topic has 42 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 6 months ago by
.
- Posts
13/8 Man City
15/8 Chelsea
9/2 Barcelona
8/1 Real Madrid(William Hill)
Can see it being Chelsea.
What a surprise Matthew, did one of your sources tell you
If he stays in England, and does move, then it will be City. If he moves and goes abroad it will be Real Madrid.
But, and it’s a big but (not as in a big ar$e), I think he will stay at United. I think it will all die down eventually and he’ll come to his senses.
No, noones told me anything matey.
But the reason why I think Chelsea is Ancelottis already said he likes him and it’ll give him a fresh start away from the north.
He’s mates with lots of chelsea players and he’s told Fergie he doesn’t want to stay, they’re on a decline now.
There’s only two teams you can take seriously long term and that’s Man City and Chelsea.
I think it’s probably the best for all concerned that he leaves, and I think Fernando Torres holds the key to where Rooney will end up.
If Torres decides to go to Chelsea (undoubtedly their first choice of the two), Rooney could only end up at the other club who could afford his wages, in City. He definitely isn’t going abroad – that’s for sure. The rest are nowhere IMO. Man Utd, in their financial woe, will no doubt try and ‘replace’ him in a player plus cash deal, with the cash going straight into the bank never to be seen again.
I wonder how much United will salvage from the deal? He only has 18 months left on his contract, and could go for a goldfish and a balloon next summer!
And the Mancs were all laughing at Fabregas’ near certain departure from Arsenal at the end of the season, who happens to be tied down until 2015!
Dear o dear
No, noones told me anything matey.
But the reason why I think Chelsea is Ancelottis already said he likes him and it’ll give him a fresh start away from the north.
He’s mates with lots of chelsea players and he’s told Fergie he doesn’t want to stay, they’re on a decline now.
There’s only two teams you can take seriously long term and that’s Man City and Chelsea
.
This is not true. If Abromovich walks away from Chelsea you’re up sh1t creek, if the the Arabs walk away from Man City then they are up sh1t creek.
Chelsea and Man City are not being run on their own club’s money, they are being run on their ownners’ money, and believe me Matthew, that puts them in a more dangerous situation than most because like I say, if those owners walk away, then those clubs will be in dire straits.
There’s only one team you can take seriously long term and that’s Arsenal. A football club that has been run superbly in terms of finance, and because so, they’ll always be in and around the top four for the forseeable future.
Do you know anything about football One Eye?
Roman Abramovich has left a legacy to his son.
As for Arsenal? They haven’t won a trophy in 6 years?
You’re having a laugh son.
Do you know anything about football One Eye?
Roman Abramovich has left a legacy to his son.
As for Arsenal? They haven’t won a trophy in 6 years?
You’re having a laugh son.
What’s winning trophies got to do with it. Man City haven’t won anything for over 20 years yet they are currently favourites to sign him. Arsenal wouldn’t consider paying his likely wages, would he get a game at Barcelona ? That leaves Chelsea and Real Madrid. I think it depends on how much stick he wants to take from the English game. If he’s got any sense he’ll go to Madrid and let Mourinho sort him out.
Winning trophies has got lots to do with it, success will always attract the top players.
Winning trophies has got lots to do with it, success will always attract the top players.
So why would he consider Man City ?
Winning trophies has got lots to do with it, success will always attract the top players.
So why would he consider Man City ?
Because winning trophies is imminent at Eastlands. They’ve got money to burn.
Currently, Chelsea are the best team in England and have money aswell.
Realistically, the future powers of the premiership are the above two.
http://images.sportinglife.com/sportinglife/panel_pics/waynerooneymancityshirtpan.jpg
Do you know anything about football One Eye?
Roman Abramovich has left a legacy to his son.
As for Arsenal? They haven’t won a trophy in 6 years?
You’re having a laugh son.
I’ve forgotten more than you will ever know mate. You just see things through Chelsea rose tinted glasses, you always have done… win one game and you think your the best team in the world, you lose and all of a sudden it’s you don’t care.
So what if Abramovic has left a legacy to his son, does that mean his son wants to own Chelsea for the rest of his life.
And as far as I’m aware we’re not talking about winning trophies, we were talking about clubs having a long term future.
So answer this question honestly, if Abramovich (or his son) leaves Chelsea, who will be in a better financial state… Chelsea or Arsenal?
You’re just anti-Chelsea one eye, Arsenal are in a good financial position but I live near Islington and believe me, most of their fans are very uptight over recent times.
Roman Abramovich had built an empire at Stamford Bridge, he’s even investing in a multi-million pound nightclub downstairs now, he’s here for a long time yet and Chelsea right now are in the top 3 clubs in Europe.
I’m not anti-Chelsea one bit, I’m not anti-anyone, I just say it as I see it.
You said that the only teams to take seriously long term are Man City and Chelsea. I said that’s not true. This debate alone has nothing to do with how many trophies clubs have won in the past becuase you mentioned the word FUTURE.
So all I am saying is that Chelsea and Man City are not the only two clubs to take seriously in the future, and the plain reason is that both clubs are run by owner’s money and not the club’s money. Therefore if the owners of each club jump ship, each club will be in a huge financial mess, you can’t deny that.
Arsenal are not in a financial mess, they have been run superbly in terms of finance, and therefore in the future they have to be taken seriously.
But on a different note, despite you saying Chelsea are the best team in the world (which you’ve said on countless ocassions) you still haven’t won the Champions League have you? How many times have Man United won it in the last dozen years, how many times have Barcelona won it in the lat dozen years?
You just need to face reality Matthew, Chelsea are not the best team in the world and don’t even come close to being the best team in the world until they beat the best teams in the world, and win the biggest trophy in the world.
What did I tell you months ago when you were beating West Brom? I said wait till you play teams like Man City and Villa away – tough fixtures. How many goals did your best team in the world score in those games Matthew, how many points did you collect? No goals, one point.
Personally I don’t think Chelsea will win the title, but of course, they could easily do so because United don’t look as good as I thought they would be, Arsenal keeping dropping silly points, and Liverpool, Spurs and Villa aren’t good enough. The only danger then could be City, but even if Chelsea win the title you won’t be the best team in the world until you win the Champions League.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.