- This topic has 352 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 20 years, 8 months ago by
.
- Posts
Dinner Date is included lineform for Seagulls purposes. ;)
(Edited by phunter at 7:04 pm on Mar. 11, 2005)
and what do you mean by that ?<br>seagull would agree with me in fact he did last week on this score<br>the stats clearly show it is not a selection so what do you mean are you making them :cheesy: :cheesy: up for the sake of it , have you been following this system with your own money if so you should know it is not a selection <br>lets wait to hear from seagull it is his system and a great one too , but we must only back the selections the stats put up otherwise what is the point!<br>regards<br>Lineform :cheesy:
Because i have followed Seagulls system for around 4 years now Lineform , why would i make it up for the sake of it, tell you what you stick to what you want and i’ll stick to what i do, i have been backing them with my own money, i had the A/W list before it was posted on here, as i’m sure Des would confirm. :) ÂÂÂ
That should have read as Seagull can confirm, although Des can confirm i know about the system.
(Edited by phunter at 8:08 pm on Mar. 11, 2005)
well i am sorry to say you have been backing some wrong selections for 4 years then if this is how you see w jarvis selections at wolvs<br>yes i will back the ones i see as selections and they will qualify from seagulls list as i see them<br>it was seagull that asked me to put slections for him while he is away with some help from des, as it is plain to see if you look back a little in thread <br>but as you have taken it on your self to  put the selections up  then  carry on then, but please get them right as other punters are backing these<br>regards<br>Lineform  :cool: <br>
(Edited by lineform at 8:54 pm on Mar. 11, 2005)
lol, aye ok pal if you say so, keep putting them up no probs by me i’ll just keep updating the website i help run for Seagull ,aye your right i’ve been doing it wrong for 4 years now. :biggrin:
That will be the same selections we talk about more or less daily about i’ve been getting wrong right enough, i don’t disagree with you talking as you see it but i’ll do the same. :)
(Edited by phunter at 1:54 am on Mar. 12, 2005)
listen all i am saying is you are wrong with w jarvis at wolvs <br>no big deal but at wolv you should not back w jarvis in 3yo only races that what the list says, i did’nt make the list seagull did so why you want to stray from his selections god knows<br>as for this close relationship you have with seagull working on his website why did’nt he ask you to put them up while he is away ?<br>at the end of the day i ony want to get the selections right , i am learning all the time that is why i ask questions to learn some more , but in the w jarvis case at wolvs i know the list wants us to back in 3+ and 4+ races not 3yo onlyraces seagull should be able to put us right when he gets more time <br>regards<br>Lineform<br>
Got to say I agree with Lineform on this selection. I had the same problem earlier ( see my post of Jan.29 and Seagull’s reply). <br>Could be a good idea to cool it a bit, lads!<br>Can you tell me when the system is operated – end of turf racing till start of turf racing?<br>Cheers all!
The reason i don’t put them up all the time Lineform is i have 2 disabled kids to look after and can’t be on all the time, it’s not getting overheated just some deabting. :biggrin:
yes i agree with that it is good to debate issues like this <br>like lexicon says he had a few problems along with me and i know des did with getting to grips with the method , but by debating we iron out a few things and learn as we go that is all i try to do by asking questions<br>regards<br>Lineform
Good to see it’s calming down a little.
What is confusing, I think, is the way it was written in the first place. I think both phunter and lineform are right but are not agreed on the exact interpretration of Seagulls original post.
As lineform says, we can all learn from discussion.
Keep it up :)
De
I also had to sit in A&E for 4 hours last night which didn’t help this grumpy sod. :biggrin:
Quote: from Seagull on 10:00 pm on Dec. 12, 2004[br]y
<br>jarvis  w.    3 yo and older races<br>8-30    26.6% s/r   l.sp. +30.5
AND seems to be the relevant word.
lets sort this out then Im off out for a beer.<br>w.jarvis should read as this<br>wolverhampton a/w any horse in a race for 3 y.o. and older horses and to exclude any races just for 3 y.o. horses So that is for 3 y o horses racing against older horses and also 4 yo 5yo 6 yo 7yo etc etc etc<br>rsb reads last 6 seasons for these types of race as 8-30 have won a s/r of 26.67% and a l.s.p. of £30.50 <br>so today I personally only had indepted  and Moonstruck in the 4.20 <br>thats the selection <br>all the others were correct so todau there were 9 selections 3 winners @7/2 @11/8 @11/4 so a l.s.p.on the day of +2.62 points<br>l.s.p. now since Ive been posting them here is +49.37
(Edited by Seagull at 7:57 pm on Mar. 12, 2005)
<br>(Edited by Seagull at 7:59 pm on Mar. 12, 2005)<br>
(Edited by Seagull at 8:41 am on Mar. 13, 2005)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.