The home of intelligent horse racing discussion
The home of intelligent horse racing discussion

Seven Lengths in a Five Furlong Sprint

Home Forums Horse Racing Seven Lengths in a Five Furlong Sprint

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #15507
    fivelongdays
    Participant
    • Total Posts 728

    Hamilton 2.45 today, Crimea wins a 5f sprint by seven lengths.

    Now, I may be marking myself out as a total n00b to the flat, for which I can only apologise, but when Workforce won over 1m4f by the same distance, everyone was oohing and aahing (and, yes, I know it was the Derby, but still), so can we give this winning margin the credit it deserves.

    Indeed, should be give this winning margin credit?

    Would be interested to see what everyone else thinks :)

    FLD

    BlueSky @pghenn.bsky.social

    So don't run, just like the others always do

    #303808
    Avatar photoMatthew01
    Member
    • Total Posts 1083

    Not really fella, it was a weak race with only a few runners, in which
    he started at ‘seven on’.

    Workforce was running against high class horses, that’s the long and short of it.

    #303814
    Avatar photoOneEye
    Member
    • Total Posts 661

    Not really fella, it was a weak race with only a few runners, in which
    he started at ‘seven on’.

    Workforce was running against high class horses, that’s the long and short of it.

    You’re talking about the wrong race Matthew, the 1/7 shot was in the first race and won by 5 lengths :D

    But you’re right in what you say, the race that the horse won by 7 lengths was a very weak affair. The second favourite needed to lead but missed the break, the third favourite pulled too hard, and the winner got the run of the race, bagged the rail and just kept going.

    The winner finished sixth in the Epsom dash last time out, and was now in a seller/claimer (don’t know which one exactly without checking) so was fully entiteld to win by a wide margin.

    #303816
    fivelongdays
    Participant
    • Total Posts 728

    Not really fella, it was a weak race with only a few runners, in which
    he started at ‘seven on’.

    He was 15-8, I think you may be confusing it with the previous race!

    BlueSky @pghenn.bsky.social

    So don't run, just like the others always do

    #303819
    Avatar photoMatthew01
    Member
    • Total Posts 1083

    :lol: sorry chaps, I did make a mistake.

    That was Adrian Nicholls’s only ride of the day,
    but I’ll stand by the point that it was an extremely
    weak contest and the winner was obviously well thought
    of to run at Epsom in a much higher class and then dropped
    into this company.

    #303820
    Glenn
    Participant
    • Total Posts 2003

    You’re talking about the wrong race Matthew, the 1/7 shot was in the first race and won by 5 lengths :D

    But you’re right in what you say, the race that the horse won by 7 lengths was a very weak affair. The second favourite needed to lead but missed the break, the third favourite pulled too hard, and the winner got the run of the race, bagged the rail and just kept going.

    The winner finished sixth in the Epsom dash last time out, and was now in a seller/claimer (don’t know which one exactly without checking) so was fully entiteld to win by a wide margin.

    You’re talking about the wrong race last time out. The beast last competed in…no wait…it was the Epsom dash.

    #303821
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Total Posts 17716

    I’d be more intersted in the Richard Fahey 2yo!

    8)

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.