The home of intelligent horse racing discussion
The home of intelligent horse racing discussion

Peter Grayson at it again

Home Forums Horse Racing Peter Grayson at it again

Viewing 13 posts - 18 through 30 (of 30 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #147104
    Avatar photograysonscolumn
    Participant
    • Total Posts 7038

    I’ve been telling you all for years that Grayson is as straight as the M25

    A chap can get paranoid, you know. 8)

    gc

    Jeremy Grayson. Son of immigrant. Adoptive father of two. Metadata librarian. Freelance point-to-point / horse racing writer, analyst and commentator wonk. Loves music, buses, cats, the BBC Micro, ale. Advocate of CBT, PACE and therapeutic parenting. Aspergers.

    #147113
    davidjohnson
    Member
    • Total Posts 4491

    Stoneacre Sarah 25’s into 5’s.

    #147150
    LetsGetRacing
    Member
    • Total Posts 1147

    33/1 into 7/2 and it..ahem…wins ‘well’.

    Hmmm.

    #147152
    Avatar photoCav
    Participant
    • Total Posts 4833

    The Stoneacre with the yellow hat didn’t get a tap…

    #147155
    Smithy
    Member
    • Total Posts 720

    A fine result for racing.

    #147162
    LetsGetRacing
    Member
    • Total Posts 1147

    The funniest thing is he was interviewed on ATR 5 minutes before the race and said ‘I honestly believe 4 of these could win this race’. I’m just wondering how he managed to keep a straight face with Stoneacre Sarah’s odds dropping by the second.

    #147166
    Smithy
    Member
    • Total Posts 720

    I enjoyed the way there was a false gamble on one of them on Betfair (about 20 quid) as a smokescreen. That said, any firm who priced the race up knew the potential pitfalls.

    #147179
    Avatar photoJim JTS
    Member
    • Total Posts 841

    I selected the "right" one on my website but didn’t get any of the fancy prices :cry:

    never mind though at least I found the winner and thats what matters :)

    #147182
    seabird
    Participant
    • Total Posts 2923

    No, Jim, value is what matters! :wink:

    Colin

    #149105
    Avatar photograysonscolumn
    Participant
    • Total Posts 7038

    Possibly in a similar vein, possibly not, forumites may be interested to note that Evan Williams has six of the 10 runners declared for the 0-115 novices’ chase at Huntingdon on Wednesday.

    A measure taken to make sure the race doesn’t re-open, or a statement of intent to try to have the race to himself? Discuss.

    gc

    Jeremy Grayson. Son of immigrant. Adoptive father of two. Metadata librarian. Freelance point-to-point / horse racing writer, analyst and commentator wonk. Loves music, buses, cats, the BBC Micro, ale. Advocate of CBT, PACE and therapeutic parenting. Aspergers.

    #149172
    Neil Watson
    Participant
    • Total Posts 1376

    It could be possible yes but as the stable has been fairly quiet of late maybe he needs races for his horses to run in and it may be case of finding a small race which will go unoticed as everyone will be concentrating on Cheltenham.

    Maybe a rule should exsist on number of entries by a trainer per race but a trainer cant help what his horses will become wether it be a 5f sprinter or a 3m chaser

    #150300
    Avatar photograysonscolumn
    Participant
    • Total Posts 7038

    Five declared in an eight-runner race, four withdrawn on vet’s certs, and the remaining one held in last place.

    As Messrs Luck and Mellish have just said, they are in no position to vouch for the legitimacy of the withdrawals from their remove, but it would constitute a dereliction of duty for the stewards not to at least take a good long look at what happened at Huntingdon today.

    gc

    Jeremy Grayson. Son of immigrant. Adoptive father of two. Metadata librarian. Freelance point-to-point / horse racing writer, analyst and commentator wonk. Loves music, buses, cats, the BBC Micro, ale. Advocate of CBT, PACE and therapeutic parenting. Aspergers.

    #151810
    Avatar photokentdougal
    Participant
    • Total Posts 277

    I fail to see what all the fuss is about if a trainer wants to enter loads of horses in the same race it’s his right. It’s also your right not back any of them if you feel it’s a problem. This all arises from the ridiculous notion that trainers have the faintest idea of the relative ability of their horses – dream on they’ve even less idea than jockeys.

Viewing 13 posts - 18 through 30 (of 30 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.