- This topic has 24 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 1 month ago by
.
- Posts
If I was the judge I would have awarded Heather Mills nothing, what about you?
I think she’s a greedy, talentless cowbag.
Personally , I thought she wouldn’t have a leg to stand on. Sorry. Although I heard from a friend last night who said that part of the settlement means that sir PMC has to give her his plane, but that a Ladyshave will do for the other leg.
The award works out at around £17,000 for each night of the marriage – a lot more than she used to earn (allegedly).
Well what can i say, she is only in it for the money, if she does not want 24 Million, she can gladly pass it on to me
.Paul is very aware of his responsibilities to Bea and whats more was she about when he was earning his Money or have i missed something.
I’d better call it quits here i think before i say something that i shouldn’t if you get my meaning.
Cheers
Adrian.
Having never met either of them I do find it quite disturbing that so many people are prepared to side with the good old ex-Beatle rather than Heather Mills. For a marriage to fail takes two people usually and I would be very surprised if the fault is all on one side.
It isn’t a story I would usually pay much attention to but I am constantly surprised at how one-sided and vitriolic the media is on this subject. Yes she might have married him for his money, then again she might not. None of us really know so is the level of hatred aimed at a former model really justified?
I can understand where you are coming from AH however there has only been one party who has felt it necessary to appear regularly on prime time television to air their grievances. I can’t quite believe that £24 million pounds isn’t enough for such a short marriage particularly as she has stated publicly its not about the money. It is a tad disturbing though that certain conditions reported, such as not talking about the marriage in public were part of the bargaining tools on Mr McCartneys side.
Macca must have been singing the Frog Chorus in the bath last night.
Friend of mine got divorced last July. Lovely fella. In eleven years of marriage, he never chased women, never gambled, never fought, drank respectable amounts, never raised his voice – or his fists – and was, to all intents and purposes, a model husband for all those years.
One night last Summer, he’s at home watching Channel 4 News and his wife suddenly announces from the sofa that she wants a divorce. Startled, he asked why. She gave him a twenty minute answer couched in modern feminine, therapeutic,self-help terminology which amounted to the fact she was bored. She packed a bag and left that night.
Despite the fact they had no children (pair of them are too selfish for that) he ended up paying out 200k for the eleven years of marriage – which he revealed to be about 40% of his total assets including ISA’s, pensions, a house with mortgage paid etc. He considered this, he revealed to me, a bargain, because his solicitor warned that he could lose anything up to 400k. With no fault on either side, no-one else involved and no unreasonable behaviour. (I know. Gobsmacking isn’t it!).
£24M? Thats about 5% of the ex-Beatle’s treasure trove. I feel sorry for her a bit: it’s a Bullseye settlement, let’s face it. You could imagine Jim Bowen putting a comforting arm around Heather outside the court and escorting her across the road to Bully’s Prize Board, which slowly rotates to reveal an oversized celebrity cheque for £150 Million mounted on a golden plinth.
"Never mind, lass", says Jim. "Here’s what you could have won…"
The bloke is worth a reported £800m (that’s £800,000,000). If invested properly a years interest would cover the settlement.
Tight git.
You wouldn’t have seen Lennon squabbling in the high court over a bit of loose change.
If Heather can prove that she was not in it for the dough then fair play to her and i will have no problem in retracting my statement earlier.
Who wanted it to go to Court in the first place if i’m not mistaken it was not Paul, so it might seem that i am taking sides but i can assure you that i am not
.I suppose at the end of the day it’s personal opinions and there will be the one’s who take exception to what is said by one side or the other.
Interesting saga none the less.
Cheers.
Adrian.
She should be awared the princley sum of £1.
But he should be made to pay her £2M a year “Fu*ckwit Stipend”, for marrying the gold-digging harpy in the first place.
She should be awared the princley sum of £1.
But he should be made to pay her £2M a year “Fu*ckwit Stipend”, for marrying the gold-digging harpy in the first place.
Spot on Judge Grasshopper. I think you could make a living at this legal lark. Could you nip down and sort out this Al Fayed nonsense when you’ve got a minute and save us from any more reports from Nicholas Witchell ?
She is a tart from sunderland, one whom hasd she bother too hire decent council would have made far more from this divorce than she has done.
The moment their daughter was born was the moment that cost him severla million more too divorce her, he was a silly ass too have a child too her and she will suffer becuase of her fathers foolishness, its their daughter who is the looser in all this.
Well first of all, Dave, I would have wanted to see all of the details that the judge in question saw, gather all of the evidence and then make a decision. As opposed to reading the Daily Express, deciding that she’s a ‘tart’ and a ‘golddigger’ because some tabloid editor told me she was.
I couldn’t understand why people who’d never met Diana and knew nothing about her were so infatuated with her and I can’t now understand why Heather Mills is the target of so much abuse. Seems to me she does some good work for charity and I’ve no particular reason to dislike her nor to assume that she is evil incarnate and Paul McCartney is a saint.
Of course, I stand to be corrected if any of my fellow forumites are personal friends of Paul McCartney and are well-informed on the details of their marriage.
I think it would probably be fair if she walked out with what she walked in with and he did the same. That way he’s not getting all of her cash and she’s not getting all of his.
He is a fool though. A prenuptial agreement should have been in place, it would have saved her all of the embarassment of being labelled a money grabbing bint, etc.
If I ever get married again, I’ll get one.
.
.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.