- This topic has 38 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 10 months ago by
steveh31.
- AuthorPosts
- July 1, 2005 at 17:59 #92205
it will not be the government that will enforce it but you will need it to make see a doctor, renew licenses, use a bank, book tickets but you’ll be free, skint, il,l not be able to drive nor go on holiday.:biggrin:
July 1, 2005 at 19:50 #92206Purwell –
Do you have/use a passport?
July 1, 2005 at 21:14 #92207People should get organised and not let their freedom and liberties be flushed done the bog by a gang of power crazy fools and liars
July 1, 2005 at 21:58 #92209and you will need it renew your passport and to pass security at check-in gst into offices buildings etc etc etc etc etc etc.
We either need a mega riot, civil disobience or something similar but believe me we will all have one.
July 2, 2005 at 06:08 #92210Cormack15<br>I do not have a passport, but I’m beginning to think I will get one, so that I can escape!
I've stumbled on the side of twelve misty mountains
I've walked and I crawled on six crooked highwaysJuly 2, 2005 at 21:25 #92211They’re going to finger print, photograph and DNA the entire population .
Dave,
I wonder if you can clarify for us all where you got the information that the ID will contain DNA samples of everyone? I really don’t believe this to be the case.
I was involved at a lower level regarding a trial the Passport Office ran during last year.
July 2, 2005 at 22:06 #92212July 2, 2005 at 22:22 #92214Dave,
So as to not confuse people. There are no plans at the moment to include DNA samples on the ID card. The Chairman of the Police Superintendents Association wants a national database holding everyones DNA. Two separate issues I believe.
July 2, 2005 at 22:47 #92215Well, that’s the sales pitch isn’t it Sailing Shoes. I remember the Fuzz was on the telly saying that people shouldn’t link the two things together, or the public wouldn’t support either.
The intention of the rulers is to collect everyone’s DNA and all of the other good stuff. I think it will be added to the ID card, only time will tell. You are quite correct of course, two separate issues, at the moment !
July 3, 2005 at 07:36 #92216So its time to buy shares in DNA labs?:biggrin:
July 3, 2005 at 08:33 #92218I’ve got a question for those who are concerned about the ID cards.
Apart from the cost and the governments determination to play pioneer on this issue (therefore increasing the cost), I’ve got to say I’m totally undifferent about the whole thing.
Perhaps, in my indifference, I’ve not heard the counter-arguments.
So, what am I failing to understand?
What exactly do you guys think big brother’s going to do with this information?
Steve
July 3, 2005 at 10:05 #92220Steve, these are the FAQs about ID cards, formerly known as Entitlement Cards
I really don’t like the bit about my kids having to have a card .. :angry:
I don’t want any government offical building up a picture of what I do or how I live my life. I am a law abiding and private person and I don’t want to see billions of pounds wasted on a gimmick that won’t work.
July 3, 2005 at 11:27 #92222Hoppy
What gives the Government, indeed any Government, the right to collate and hold information about your DNA profile?
I think we should clarify what we mean by "government" here.
There are some issues about identity fraud, benefit fraud and illegal immigration which concern certain government departments.
They seem to think that this is the way to deal with these things. Personally, I, live most people, are unconvinced.
However, the idea that there is some sort of secret department that’s going to do evil things with this info, doesn’t convince me.
I’ve known too many people who’ve worked in the "less reported" areas of government to buy into that.
Or your fingerprints (assuming you are entirely law abiding – the occassional bit of puff excepted )?
So, it’s only those who break certain laws that should be forced to give up their fingerprints?
Hmmmm…
Don’t get me started on people picking and choosing which laws apply to them. <br> <br>given that the reasons for their introduction have been changed after every challenge, it does make me wonder what exactly the motive for introducing them might be.
That’s a very good point. I think this is partly down to the government not really knowing why they are going this.
However, given the government’s history on issues where the reasons change whenever the last set of reasons were shown to be nonsense, we should demand that they give clear, consistent and solid reasons for ID cards before we allow them to spend our cash on them.
On the other hand, the Italians (amongst others) have long had an ID card scheme, and they would probably wonder what all the fuss is about.
The ID cards in countries like France and Germany don’t hold the biometric info that ID cards in this country would hold, so they’re not really comparable IMO.
Dave
I really don’t like the bit about my kids having to have a card
If I had kids, I”d be too busy trying to sort out the environment to be worried about ID cards.
That’s the biggest threat to them right now and, rather than fixing it, we’re accelerating towards environmental distaster.
Steve
July 3, 2005 at 14:22 #92225So, Stavros, you’ve never broken the speed limit then?
I reckon, when I was younger, I could manage around 19mph over short distances.
However, well into my thirties, the old legs just can’t move at that speed anymore.
Steve
July 3, 2005 at 20:56 #92227Agree with most of what’s been said on this thread. Haven’t been able to view the forum regularly of late – but it’s nice to see debates such as this still going strong.<br>If only we had an opposition party that included the likes of stevedvg/davej and grasshopper. <br>(As interesting as Ian Davies’ views are, I rather think he’s more of a " new labour " man.)
July 4, 2005 at 09:06 #92230If only we had an opposition party that included the likes of stevedvg/davej and grasshopper.
Opposition??? Surely you mean government
If either Dave Jay or Hoppy stood in my constitution, I’d vote for them (despite the intense personal dislike I have for them).
:biggrin: :biggrin:
What our parliament needs is honest, principled and independent people who understand that they’re employed by their constituants, not a political party and, therefore, put the people first.
In this lounge alone, there are probably at least 10 people who are or were regular contributers to political topics (including yourself) that fit the bill.
So there’d be no problem finding 650 people in this country to create proper democracy: government of the people, by the people, for the people.
Steve
July 4, 2005 at 20:17 #92231Ian – wow, cracking post considering it was done at such an ungodly hour. Keep them coming (I’m sure you will :biggrin: ).
Stevedg – agree with all you say.<br>(All this agreeing with forumites could be a sign that I’m beginning to mellow with (relative) old age.)<br> I’ve long since abandoned any faith in politicians.<br> The only one I have any admiration for nowadays is George W. Bush; great guy. I’m sure we’re all agreed on that! :biggrin:
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.