- This topic has 66 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 4 months ago by
.
- Posts
You’re an expert in "naivety" Woolf.
It’s obvious you don’t understand odds.Perhaps not Gingerhedger, but unlike you, I understand ability when I see it, sadly it’s not always on view except when 3 25/1 shots thoroughly stuff horses that you lavished high stakes on the other day in the Ladbroke. You didn’t see that coming exactly like the rest of us.
Stick to your scattergun, you’ll never be a marksman.
You’re an expert in "naivety" Woolf.
It’s obvious you don’t understand odds.Perhaps not Gingerhedger, but unlike you, I understand ability when I see it, sadly it’s not always on view except when 3 25/1 shots thoroughly stuff horses that you lavished high stakes on the other day in the Ladbroke.
You didn’t see that coming exactly like the rest of us.
I backed the winner of the Ladbroke Woolf.
Value Is EverythingYou’re an expert in "naivety" Woolf.
It’s obvious you don’t understand odds.Perhaps not Gingerhedger, but unlike you, I understand ability when I see it,
Sadly you’re the one who seems to have no ability to make a profit out of racing which is why you feel compelled to knock a man who does. You seem to be jealous of Ginge and the fact he makes a profit. I’m really struggling to see why you come on this forum when you so clearly hate the sport. You are like another certain member on here who can’t make it pay so have to blame everyone and everything else for your own deficiencies.
Have you seen the profits churned by Ginge on his thread Woolf? It may not be by backing one horse per race, and as he’s stated on several occasions his methods may not be seen as ‘conventional’, but it certainly doesn’t deserve its’ knockers.
You’re an expert in "naivety" Woolf.
It’s obvious you don’t understand odds.Perhaps not Gingerhedger, but unlike you, I understand ability when I see it,
Sadly you’re the one who seems to have no ability to make a profit out of racing which is why you feel compelled to knock a man who does. You seem to be jealous of Ginge and the fact he makes a profit. I’m really struggling to see why you come on this forum when you so clearly hate the sport. You are like another certain member on here who can’t make it pay so have to blame everyone and everything else for your own deficiencies.
How do you know that I’ve not made it pay? I’ve withdrawn
profit from one of my accounts this very day.How do you know that I’ve not made it pay? I’ve withdrawn
profit from one of my accounts this very day.Shame about the other twenty accounts though Woolf.
Value Is EverythingYou’re an expert in "naivety" Woolf.
It’s obvious you don’t understand odds.Perhaps not Gingerhedger, but unlike you, I understand ability when I see it, sadly it’s not always on view except when 3 25/1 shots thoroughly stuff horses that you lavished high stakes on the other day in the Ladbroke.
You didn’t see that coming exactly like the rest of us.
I backed the winner of the Ladbroke Woolf.
You nailed it at the seventh attempt after 6 losers. Great form reading, you narrowed it down to seven runners.
How do you know that I’ve not made it pay? I’ve withdrawn
profit from one of my accounts this very day.Shame about the other twenty accounts though Woolf.
Just one other account and that’s in profit too.
he’s stated on several occasions his methods may not be seen as ‘conventional’
I think they are totally conventional. There is no difference in backing one horse in a race or half-a-dozen. It’s exactly the same procedure.
Mike
How do you know that I’ve not made it pay? I’ve withdrawn
profit from one of my accounts this very day.Interesting that. You knock the sport, your posts suggest you think it is riddled with corruption yet you bet on it. That strikes me as something only a fool would do. If you make a profit ( I don’t believe you) why knock it ?
How do you know that I’ve not made it pay? I’ve withdrawn
profit from one of my accounts this very day.Interesting that. You knock the sport, your posts suggest you think it is riddled with corruption yet you bet on it. That strikes me as something only a fool would do. If you make a profit ( I don’t believe you) why knock it ?
To follow on from that, why knock others that make a profit? Smacks of bitterness to me.
Have you seen the profits churned by Ginge on his thread Woolf? It may not be by backing one horse per race, and as he’s stated on several occasions his methods may not be seen as ‘conventional’, but it certainly doesn’t deserve its’ knockers.
I noted his main bets over Friday and Saturday, he was down 62 points on his strongest selections. I hope he was backing 10p a point.
Have you seen the profits churned by Ginge on his thread Woolf? It may not be by backing one horse per race, and as he’s stated on several occasions his methods may not be seen as ‘conventional’, but it certainly doesn’t deserve its’ knockers.
I noted his main bets over Friday and Saturday, he was down 62 points on his strongest selections. I hope he was backing 10p a point.
Have you seen the profits churned by Ginge on his thread Woolf? It may not be by backing one horse per race, and as he’s stated on several occasions his methods may not be seen as ‘conventional’, but it certainly doesn’t deserve its’ knockers.
I noted his main bets over Friday and Saturday, he was down 62 points on his strongest selections. I hope he was backing 10p a point.
Which clearly shows you don’t understand betting or the words ‘long term’.
I’ve an idea. If you are a profitable punter (and we know you’re not) do what Ginger does. Post your selections in advance for all to see. Let’s then see how good you are.
No, I didn’t think you would have the balls to do that.
Have you seen the profits churned by Ginge on his thread Woolf? It may not be by backing one horse per race, and as he’s stated on several occasions his methods may not be seen as ‘conventional’, but it certainly doesn’t deserve its’ knockers.
I noted his main bets over Friday and Saturday, he was down 62 points on his strongest selections. I hope he was backing 10p a point.
The fact you’ve stalked someones’ thread over a weekend to try and prove yourself right kind of proves everyones’ point that you appear to be slightly bitter over another man’s financial success. I’m not here to fight anyone elses battles but I suggest you spend more time picking your own horses and less time attacking others for how they make their money.
Essentially, Gingerhedger and his acolytes are anoraks with ideas about mathematics that have no foundation in reality.
In my experience the world’s leading horseplayers are not moonlighting from their academic careers as math lecturers.My advice to them is buy a racehorse, rub shoulders with the cognoscenti, find out where their money is going and follow suit.
Have you seen the profits churned by Ginge on his thread Woolf? It may not be by backing one horse per race, and as he’s stated on several occasions his methods may not be seen as ‘conventional’, but it certainly doesn’t deserve its’ knockers.
I noted his main bets over Friday and Saturday, he was down 62 points on his strongest selections. I hope he was backing 10p a point.
The fact you’ve stalked someones’ thread over a weekend to try and prove yourself right kind of proves everyones’ point that you appear to be slightly bitter over another man’s financial success. I’m not here to fight anyone elses battles but I suggest you spend more time picking your own horses and less time attacking others for how they make their money.
It’s an open forum, I wanted to see his selections. He invites followers, I wrote them down, all of them and watched the race.
It was very disappointing when only one of four savers carrying 40p won with heavily backed runners stuffed.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.