The home of intelligent horse racing discussion
The home of intelligent horse racing discussion

Exeter, Kelso & Perth join Racing UK

Home Forums Horse Racing Exeter, Kelso & Perth join Racing UK

Viewing 7 posts - 35 through 41 (of 41 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #403012
    CrustyPatch
    Participant
    • Total Posts 921

    It’s a great shame Exeter, Perth and Kelso have been lost to At The Races, from the point of view of people like me who haven’t got Racing UK.
    I keep reading comments in various places about how much better quality the pictures are on Racing UK. Even on an HD TV, the ATR pictures are so unbelievably blurred, it’s an embarrassment.
    As mentioned elsewhere, the ATR pictures are like watching the blurred, poorly defined World of Sport pictures from the 1970s of the ITV 7. It’s no exaggeration.
    I understand that even some 1970s porn movies had better quality pictures than ATR’s — and at least the naughty movies didn’t feature Sir Bob Cooper or Jason Weaver.

    #403017
    no idea
    Member
    • Total Posts 684

    Must say I have never had problems with the ATR pictures. Same standard as RUK IMO.
    Must be your area Crusty Patch
    Personally I prefer ATR to RUK

    #403046
    Avatar photoDaveMonk
    Member
    • Total Posts 153

    I understand that even some 1970s porn movies had better quality pictures than ATR’s — and at least the naughty movies didn’t feature Sir Bob Cooper or Jason Weaver.

    Who was in the porn flicks then Crusty???? Whoahhhhhh biggg fellaaaa Thompson. Stay right there!

    #403047
    Avatar photoDaveMonk
    Member
    • Total Posts 153

    Must say I have never had problems with the ATR pictures. Same standard as RUK IMO.
    Must be your area Crusty Patch
    Personally I prefer ATR to RUK

    Me 2 and I watch them on laptop, they do seem a bit greyer in colour but it dosnt cause a problem.

    #403049
    Avatar photoCarryOnKatie
    Participant
    • Total Posts 599

    Might just be my eyes, but there appears to be a crispness and clarity with pictures on RUK, while ATR seems a bit more "pixelly".

    #403050
    CrustyPatch
    Participant
    • Total Posts 921

    I understand that even some 1970s porn movies had better quality pictures than ATR’s — and at least the naughty movies didn’t feature Sir Bob Cooper or Jason Weaver.

    Who was in the porn flicks then Crusty???? Whoahhhhhh biggg fellaaaa Thompson. Stay right there!

    Naturally, I haven’t seen any of the dodgy films myself but I’m told that, in Confessions Of A Racing Presenter, Matt Chapman has a very small part. I have to say, it didn’t come as any great surprise. :lol:

    #405650
    dennis.hodgkins2
    Member
    • Total Posts 1

    It’s a real shame that certain tracks have jumped ship and moved to Racing UK.
    Yes, the pictures are a lot sharper and yes, ATR do spend too much time on Irish racing; but it’s supplied free to the very core of support racing needs.
    At so much per month, Racing UK is not viable to the average ‘stay at home’ racing fan. Sky Movies is only an extra £8 in comparison. If RUK was (say) £4 a month extra, then people would consider it. Until then, racing continues to shoot itself in the foot by closing the door to thousands of people who might just like to go racing.
    That leads me onto the topic of entry charges at tracks……!
    Over-priced or what. No wonder the racing pool as a whole is dwindling. No amount of new promotions, staged competitions, team events will help. Racing has changed the demograhic of the clients they should be after.

Viewing 7 posts - 35 through 41 (of 41 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.