Forum Replies Created
- Posts
When posts were getting too close to the truth, Barry Dennis let rip with his “UNWASHEDâ€ÂÂ
The sorry trail of corporate-to-corporate ownership is vitally important to this debate. For example: with SP clearly being screwed over, who exactly is pulling the strings?
And empty wallet scores a bullseye with:<br>“IF the SP is supposed to represent "the market" at the off,  then it should include all the players in that market, this should include, exchanges, tote, on course, off course markets
â€ÂÂ
With the level of betting code awareness from a punter’s perspective now disclosed at an introductory level. This closing look at and flip side to racing (sport) ‘inside information’ marketing is now examined from a corporate perspective.
Stage 2<br>Revolutionary development in (sports) racing ‘inside information’ marketing as a corporate tax deductible financial loss or “casualty lossâ€ÂÂ
Dave,<br>Certainly, yes. And the following and closing post will offer a flip-side view on cartel operations.<br>AR
dave jay writes (Dec. 13, 8:54pm, page 1):<br>“Unfortunately Alan, as you have been unable to produce the goods, ie. a winner before the event, the sceptics have won the day.â€ÂÂ
Wallace writes:<br>“AlanRidley , do you intend to ever post a slection BEFORE a race?â€ÂÂ
Overview:<br>With the level of betting code awareness from a punter’s perspective now disclosed at an introductory level. The flip side to racing (sport) ‘inside information’ marketing is now examined from a corporate perspective.
dave jay asks on forum (2nd Gold Star awarded); although many others have privately asked similar questions.<br>“So, behind all of the steganography and wheelings and dealings of the bookies cartels, what is your script Alan?
â€ÂÂ
Dolus writes (Dec.11, 10:15pm, page 15):<br>“Let’s see if I have got this right.
â€ÂÂ
Wallace and Aragon,<br>The dot.com site which you both refer to is not associated in any way whatsoever with Alan Ridley, the Betting Code or this topic. Period.
As was mentioed earlier, the term "betting code" has surfaced a few times over the years, however, only the Betting Code is cryptographic in nature. Furthermore, this author is replying to your critique squarly and fairly. Traditionally, conmen stay silent or head for the hills.<br>AR
Update,<br>Ouija Board’s eleventh hour withdrawl from a run at Sha Tin is very suspicious in view of the timing. The author’s Hong Kong contact is severly p**s
ed at the reason why, too: "This morning, much to our surprise, the mare wasn’t quite right. We x-rayed the leg and the damage was unremarkable, but she has jarred herself either on the dirt or the grass and we decided that enough was enough." electric Telegraph and Press association.However, we have no choice but to accept the official reason and move on. Farrier and vet issues were supposed to be avoided on this topic, however, the author is always angry at the mistreatment, however so conducted, of horses. This is an example of getting your disclosure wrong (see Sha Tin ref. 12:23pm, page 11).
No chance to properly study the Monday Dec. 11 ‘backdoor’ yet, hope to do so by Tue-Wed. First indications look KAP heavy. Even on ‘Magnificent Seven’ day they were much lighter in KAP. Remember, when Racing Pages (pseudo) falseodds trumpet, not 20-30 winners’ home, but 20,000-30,000 winners’ home, the Law of Probability is turned on its head.
AR
evens posted twice (Dec.11, 2:12 and 4:48, page 14):<br>Regarding disclosure on this forum. Nothing AR posts on this forum is off-the-cuff. Therefore, now revealed, at a private meeting that took place over a year ago, one particular code chief raised the question: “Alan, how will you answer a repetitive question from a new forum member (ie, joined after the author) that has already been asked.â€ÂÂ
dave jay writes (Dec. 9, 9:17, page 13);<br>“.. I am far too lazy to work out all of this code stuff. I’m far too busy ponsing around with primitive ratings (same as Corm and carlisle et al) to get too heavily involved. I would prefer to see the winners posted before the race before I dive in.
â€ÂÂ
LetsGetRacing writes (Dec. 9, 7:52pm, page 13):<br>“Sandpiper, he is trying to make people believe in a racketeering operation which simply doesn’t exist, by using meaningless numbers and a language which, one assumes, equates closely to English.
“The only problem is that those with even the smallest amount of common sense can see that the man is, to be fair, a complete and utter fruitcake. The sad thing is he doesn’t realise it himself, preferring instead to live in a world of delusional corruption where the grass grows pink, birds fly backwards and Peter Andre and Jordan are actually intelligent, likeable people.â€ÂÂ
Cormack15 writes (Dec. 9, 5:53pm, page 13):<br>“Beginning to have an ’emperoro’s new clothes’ feel to it this Alan. And we all had such high hopes.â€ÂÂ
