Home › Forums › Horse Racing › Whatever Happened to the Superstar Jockey ?
- This topic has 30 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 9 months ago by
andyod.
- AuthorPosts
- September 1, 2011 at 12:25 #369623
I can only add that if you are a small trainer a top jocey can charge you "travel" expenses.If you think it is worthwhile you will pay him.Trouble is if he accepts your offer he may come in for other rides at the meeting.Then you are paying travel expenses and others benefit.You can agree that if he gets other rides you don’t pay travel expenses.
September 1, 2011 at 15:45 #369629While never being regarded as a superstar, Walter Swinburn was a markedly better horseman in big races than round the gaffe. Frankie is probably the superstar but riding horses no longer occupies number one spot over his family, especially after his fortunate escape in the plane crash.
September 1, 2011 at 18:29 #369633Do top jockeys get paid a higher fee or does everyone get the standard tariff?
I am interested because sometimes one sees the comment like: "The fact that Hanagan/Fallon/Dettori has been booked for the ride suggests that connections think the horse has a good chance."
Now, if connections have to pay up to get a good jockey that suggests they are really committed and the horse has a good chance..Define a "top jockey"
You are assuming jockeys, trainers and sundry connections actually know the calibre of horse they’re charged with and/or have the nous to assess it; or at least have more ‘information’ than the studious punter. That’s a contentious one

The booking of a "top jockey" on a small-timer’s steed can on occasions be of interest, but more often than not in my experience is no more than an owner’s affectation
Of rather more interest is the booking of a ‘bottom jockey’ claiming 7, or a nondescript who can do the weight, on a high-flyer’s steed
September 1, 2011 at 21:07 #369644A silly thread really , everything has changed since Lester , Pat and Willie etc
You can only compare like with like
Nowadays we have a racing programme mostly class 5 and 6 , ie low grade crap , good racing is few and far between
For the record , my personal view is that Dettori /Murtagh . and Hughes on their day would be a match for most , except perhaps Lester who was in a league of his own and still is
cheers
Ricky
September 1, 2011 at 21:07 #369645A silly thread really , everything has changed since Lester , Pat and Willie etc
You can only compare like with like
Nowadays we have a racing programme mostly class 5 and 6 , ie low grade crap , good racing is few and far between
For the record , my personal view is that Dettori /Murtagh . and Hughes on their day would be a match for most , except perhaps Lester who was in a league of his own and still is
cheers
Ricky
September 1, 2011 at 21:07 #369646A silly thread really , everything has changed since Lester , Pat and Willie etc
You can only compare like with like
Nowadays we have a racing programme mostly class 5 and 6 , ie low grade crap , good racing is few and far between
For the record , my personal view is that Dettori /Murtagh . and Hughes on their day would be a match for most , except perhaps Lester who was in a league of his own and still is
cheers
Ricky
September 1, 2011 at 21:07 #369647A silly thread really , everything has changed since Lester , Pat and Willie etc
You can only compare like with like
Nowadays we have a racing programme mostly class 5 and 6 , ie low grade crap , good racing is few and far between
For the record , my personal view is that Dettori /Murtagh . and Hughes on their day would be a match for most , except perhaps Lester who was in a league of his own and still is
cheers
Ricky
September 1, 2011 at 21:07 #369648A silly thread really , everything has changed since Lester , Pat and Willie etc
You can only compare like with like
Nowadays we have a racing programme mostly class 5 and 6 , ie low grade crap , good racing is few and far between
For the record , my personal view is that Dettori /Murtagh . and Hughes on their day would be a match for most , except perhaps Lester who was in a league of his own and still is
cheers
Ricky
September 1, 2011 at 21:07 #369649A silly thread really , everything has changed since Lester , Pat and Willie etc
You can only compare like with like
Nowadays we have a racing programme mostly class 5 and 6 , ie low grade crap , good racing is few and far between
For the record , my personal view is that Dettori /Murtagh . and Hughes on their day would be a match for most , except perhaps Lester who was in a league of his own and still is
cheers
Ricky
September 1, 2011 at 21:29 #369651Moore and Murtagh are streets ahead of the rest. Moore, Murtagh, Fallon, top three.
September 1, 2011 at 22:15 #369656I find it interesting that many pick as one of the great jockeys,Johnny Murtagh who was let go by Ballydoyle to make room for Joseph O’Brien whose father thinks he is better than Murtagh.I know that Aidan is a great judge of a horse and a wonderful trainer but as he said to Kinane after he messed up at the BC "in a few years you will realise that you were wrong".
September 1, 2011 at 22:26 #369659Ricky – Thanks for your repeat views that a thread that I started is silly, sadly I thought that it was a point for discussion on a forum mate.
To bring you back to the original point, I wonder why the originally stated super jockeys who won big races everywhere, when transport was much more difficult, and still challenged, when they wanted, for the title, do not seem to exist any longer. (Other than a PR friendly Dettori, who is not frankly in the same league ).
With all due respect to them, Hanagan, Fallon, and de Sousa, are not a threat to stable jockeys over big race rides, spend most of their time in lower class meetings, and are not fit to be compared to the great jockeys of the pastSeptember 2, 2011 at 06:30 #369661What was it that these superstars did that Hanagan, Moore and the others can’t do now? I doubt if they made the horses go any faster (except by using the whip differently then). It seems to me the key to superior jockeyship is judging pace and position and it’s not obvious that the best riders today are worse at this than Piggott and the others.
September 2, 2011 at 11:36 #369676Perhaps you are right. Ballydoyle no longer goes for the "name jockeys".Work riders ride for them now,even in the Group One races.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.