The home of intelligent horse racing discussion
The home of intelligent horse racing discussion

What happened to the BHA Q&A session?

Home Forums Horse Racing What happened to the BHA Q&A session?

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #7552
    Glenn
    Participant
    • Total Posts 2003

    The BHA meeting where they decided on levy generating grounds to introduce stabling capacity limits certainly bore fruit today. Four 15 runner handicaps at Perth. Then we have their Kempton safety limits of 14 to look forward to tonight.

    Considering these people have raped punters today, you’d think they’d hang around to answer a few questions from those who pay their wages. Total contempt for punters on every level.

    #159495
    Avatar photoDrone
    Participant
    • Total Posts 6346

    Dear Sir

    Your decision to promote yourselves from a mere Board to that of an Authority was as inspired as it was deserved. It is clearly obvious to anyone who follows the sport you manage so authoritatively that racing has prospered under your firm but fair stewardship.

    Therefore I have no questions, and I find it hard to believe anyone else has either

    May I take this opportunity to thank you most sincerely for choosing to engage in conversation with the smelly socks – or ‘punters’ as we quaintly call ourselves – on this forum.

    Note to Cormack: is this okay? If you think some of the more complex points I’ve raised will demand too much of their valuable time, such as the research they’ll have to undertake into the word ‘punter’, then feel free to delete all but the first sentence.

    :roll:

    #159516
    Avatar photocormack15
    Keymaster
    • Total Posts 9336

    Guys –

    I’ve been chasing the BHA for their promised responses for some time now and I’ve been assured that they’ll be with me very soon.

    Some of the questions were quite searching and I’m sure they will want to think their replies through fully before committing them to this very public forum. I’m equally sure we would want them too also.

    To be fair they’ve kept in touch with me during the delay to let me know where they were at. I should have been doing likewise on the forum, sorry.

    #159517
    Avatar photoCav
    Participant
    • Total Posts 4833

    Suggesting that Clerks issue a report of when, where and how much water they put on was probably a bridge too far :?

    #159926
    Getzippy
    Participant
    • Total Posts 1152

    Interesting…very annoying when races with more than 16 declared runners end up being 15..

    I know this is not quite the same thing, but….The virtual racing in the bokies often have races of 20-25 runners or 15 runner handicaps – the dirty b**tards!

    Zip

    #159974
    bluechariot
    Participant
    • Total Posts 631

    The BHA are very busy at present pursuing the Blockley layers according to yesterdays Post. Scotney needs another kill to re establish his reputation after an independent enquiry established he was not a drunk,
    By the way the enquiry was really independent as it was conducted by a firm of Solicitors that just happen to be Solicitors to the BHA.

    #159984
    davidjohnson
    Member
    • Total Posts 4491

    I’m shocked that betting patterns of horses trained by Paul Blockley are being investigated.

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.