Home › Forums › Horse Racing › What happened to the BHA Q&A session?
- This topic has 6 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 1 month ago by
davidjohnson.
- AuthorPosts
- April 23, 2008 at 16:09 #7552
The BHA meeting where they decided on levy generating grounds to introduce stabling capacity limits certainly bore fruit today. Four 15 runner handicaps at Perth. Then we have their Kempton safety limits of 14 to look forward to tonight.
Considering these people have raped punters today, you’d think they’d hang around to answer a few questions from those who pay their wages. Total contempt for punters on every level.
April 23, 2008 at 20:42 #159495Dear Sir
Your decision to promote yourselves from a mere Board to that of an Authority was as inspired as it was deserved. It is clearly obvious to anyone who follows the sport you manage so authoritatively that racing has prospered under your firm but fair stewardship.
Therefore I have no questions, and I find it hard to believe anyone else has either
May I take this opportunity to thank you most sincerely for choosing to engage in conversation with the smelly socks – or ‘punters’ as we quaintly call ourselves – on this forum.
Note to Cormack: is this okay? If you think some of the more complex points I’ve raised will demand too much of their valuable time, such as the research they’ll have to undertake into the word ‘punter’, then feel free to delete all but the first sentence.
April 23, 2008 at 21:06 #159516Guys –
I’ve been chasing the BHA for their promised responses for some time now and I’ve been assured that they’ll be with me very soon.
Some of the questions were quite searching and I’m sure they will want to think their replies through fully before committing them to this very public forum. I’m equally sure we would want them too also.
To be fair they’ve kept in touch with me during the delay to let me know where they were at. I should have been doing likewise on the forum, sorry.
April 23, 2008 at 21:07 #159517Suggesting that Clerks issue a report of when, where and how much water they put on was probably a bridge too far
April 25, 2008 at 22:59 #159926Interesting…very annoying when races with more than 16 declared runners end up being 15..
I know this is not quite the same thing, but….The virtual racing in the bokies often have races of 20-25 runners or 15 runner handicaps – the dirty b**tards!
Zip
April 26, 2008 at 09:34 #159974The BHA are very busy at present pursuing the Blockley layers according to yesterdays Post. Scotney needs another kill to re establish his reputation after an independent enquiry established he was not a drunk,
By the way the enquiry was really independent as it was conducted by a firm of Solicitors that just happen to be Solicitors to the BHA.April 26, 2008 at 10:33 #159984I’m shocked that betting patterns of horses trained by Paul Blockley are being investigated.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.