- This topic has 27 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 2 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Colin, thanks for the welcome. Yes, you do right to be cynical as that was my first post here.
But, no, I have no connection with Horse Talk at all other than that I will no doubt end up subscribing.
Of course, if I were the publisher then you’d expect me to say that, wouldn’t you?
Best wishes<br> – Malc
I used to subscribe to Inside Edge until 2/3 months ago when they changed the content to 80% Poker….yawwwwn.
Quote: from Artemis on 9:52 am on Sep. 15, 2006[br]Our own systems forum is very quiet, so I presume most people have the game beaten and don’t want to share any knowledge. Or maybe the game has beaten them and they believe it wasn’t their fault and there’s nothing to be learned.<br>
Anyone with a winning system would be best advised to keep it under their hat as such betting is particularly sensitive to over exposure. ‘Quick returners’, ‘follow the Cheltenham Bumper/Wood Ditton runners’ spring to mind as such exposed now non-profitable systems. Though of course there is cyclicity to consider as once a system is abandoned as over-exposed it could well become profitable again for the minority prepared to stick with it.
I take your point, Drone, but posters needn’t give exact details of the methods they use.
General ideas and points for discussion are all that are required. I’m sure most of us are keen to look at this game through different perspectives, and in return we can offer our own ideas for comment.
It appears to me that the market for digital magazines. and publications is quite buoyant. I subscribe to Zinio and have subscribed to PressDisplay. It’s a pity that more racing publications don’t take advantage of the digital format for increased sales.
Quote: from mulls74 on 1:57 pm on Sep. 7, 2006[br]As someone involved in Racing Ahead, we have had a lot of positive feedback but the problem has been getting it in front of people.<br>
I’ve had Racing Ahead a couple of times and enjoyed it but availability is a major factor in me not getting more issues.
Pacemaker and Thoroughbred Owner and Breeder are two very good magazines but both are slanted towards the breeding side which will prove interesting for some but not for others.
Malc, are you the chap won runs a systems/analysis site? I’m not gonna name it otherwise i’ll get told off! Could be way off the mark as well!
Quote: from Malc Smith on 8:41 am on Sep. 15, 2006[br] At least that excretable cartoon has gone
Malc, didn’t you mean to say "execrable"?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.