Home › Forums › Archive Topics › Trends, Research And Notebooks › Racing "Inside Information" and how it is secretly
- This topic has 244 replies, 52 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 11 months ago by Seagull.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 6, 2006 at 16:38 #32459
Alan Ridley <br>Author <br>pp Karen Wicks
Hello Karen and, er, welcome to the Forum.
Mike
December 6, 2006 at 19:05 #32460Part II of post Dec.5, 8:34pm,page 6:<br>Decoding racing ‘inside information’ – this is a crash course.
Basic intro – Just as a front door key gives you access through your front door, codemakers and codebrakers also use ‘keys’ and security ‘doors’ to protect their valuables (Cryptography – see Glossary, e-page 427). Some sort of “clearance levelâ€ÂÂ
December 6, 2006 at 19:35 #32461Thanks for that Alan .. the word for what you are describing is Steganography not Cryptography
The difference being Steganography sends secret iinformation in a way that tries to hide the message and Cryptography hides the meaning of the information and not the message itself.
December 6, 2006 at 20:05 #32462Dave,<br>Yes, and the names and accurate ids have all become mixed up in many classic reference works, even the basic code/cipher difference is not immune to this. Good one.<br>AR
December 6, 2006 at 20:39 #32463Please Cormack enough of this rubbish!!!
This guy Ridley should be locked up for his own good!
Disclosure Protocol [Fu%@ed Up]
(Edited by Wallace at 8:40 pm on Dec. 6, 2006)
December 6, 2006 at 21:50 #32464Let’s give The Riddler a chance to walk the walk with his "working result" promised for Dec11th/12th (can’t wait) before the strait jacket’s applied, or re-applied
Ostensibly all very amusing, though paranoid schizophrenia ain’t.
Disclosure Protocol [ON]…and on…and on…recurring…zzz
December 6, 2006 at 22:01 #32465I’m with Drone .. give ’em enough rope and all that, it could prove to be the opposite though.
December 7, 2006 at 00:41 #32466I reckon I’ve cracked the code, boys.
Please. Don’t go mad following the Code selections.  I could be wrong. The maths are quite complicated and I’ve had that knockout flu jab.
Luckily, to divert a riot on the forum, I’ve divined a wallet-bursting treble for tomorrow which seem to be signalled by the master formula in Mr Ridley’s PDF. ÂÂÂ
Here we go! *ahum* I tell ya, if these nailed on agents of conspiracy go in, the much maligned Mr Ridley will be a hero in these parts, I should cocoa.
3.20 T Jolly Boy
1.40 L Krismas Kracker
5.50 W Scooby Dude  NAP
And for those of you who wouldn’t bet on the sand under any circumstances:-
1.35 C Mason’s Arch – I do hope Ireland is not excluded from the conspiracy! I’ll look a right chump putting this one up if it is.
Nothing doing from Huntingdon. Sorry.
Good luck!
PS: In the event of a life-changing result, London-based posters can continue to subsidise the impoverished North by sending a donation to Maxilon 5 C/O Wally’s Outside Toilet, Mansfield.
December 7, 2006 at 09:03 #32467Max
You forget to mention that your selections are only good if Cryptic Cross wins the 1:27 at Sheffield and then only at odds of 11/8. Obvious I know but I get the impression that some people don’t really understand the "code" on this forum so probably best to keep it simple!
December 7, 2006 at 18:53 #32468Well, David.
Back to the mug of tea, the roll up and Templegate in The Sun.
Bloody rubbish code :biggrin:
December 7, 2006 at 18:55 #32469Subject: basic math proof<br>Category: cryptography<br>Presented by: Alan Ridley<br>Posted on: https://www.theracingforum.co.uk<br>Date: Thursday December 7, 2006
Part III<br>Decoding racing ‘inside information’ – this is a crash course.<br>Part I: see post Dec.5, 8:34pm, page 6.<br>Part II: see post Dec.6, 7:07pm, page 8.
Kauto Star/Ruby Walsh (3:15 Exeter):“given the [cartel] office to winâ€ÂÂ
December 7, 2006 at 19:15 #32470Does this man type more than three words without talking utter b*****ks
. Enough already.December 7, 2006 at 19:46 #32471Amazing!
December 7, 2006 at 19:54 #32472C’mon Corm help us out here.
December 7, 2006 at 19:55 #32473Quote "And if forum members think this post is revealing.."
Dohhhhhhhhhhh!:confused:
I smell Sh*te!
December 7, 2006 at 20:12 #32474Firstly, I think it would be a pretty poor show, after Allan has asked for permission to post his stuff, to delete it because you don’t like it. If you don’t like it, don’t read it .. in line with the true definition of ‘free speech’.
.. secondly, later.
December 7, 2006 at 20:34 #32475<br>If nothing else some of the comments on this thread have been very amusing to read :biggrin: :biggrin: :biggrin:
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.