Home › Forums › Archive Topics › Trends, Research And Notebooks › Racing "Inside Information" and how it is secretly
- This topic has 244 replies, 52 voices, and was last updated 19 years, 1 month ago by
Seagull.
- AuthorPosts
- December 10, 2006 at 09:33 #32544
”But I don’t want to go among mad people” Alice remarked.<br>”Oh you can’t help that” said the Cat. <br>”We are all mad here. I’m Mad youre mad.<br>”How do you know I’m mad?” said Alice.<br>”You must be” said the Cat ”or you would not have come here”.<br>
December 10, 2006 at 10:38 #32545Ah, just found the Topic Unsubscribe link. See you chaps on a more sensible topic.
December 10, 2006 at 11:52 #32546Quite so Malc .. you don’t have to participate if you don’t want to.<br>:cool:
December 10, 2006 at 13:22 #32547<br>Let’s look at the evidence – this man has the ability to churn out yards of meaningless statistics and assorted gardbage. He has the belief that what he claims is undoubtedly the gospel truth in the face of overwhelming counter evidence.
He has shown the capacity to ignore all questions put to him, responding to reasonable requests with more random statements of his creed.
He is plainly totally detached from the real world, devoid of humour and impervious to criticism.
There is no question that this man should be the next Chancellor of the Exchequer !
AP
December 10, 2006 at 13:31 #32548…are you sure it’s not Thommo ?
December 10, 2006 at 13:45 #32549Quote: from apracing on 1:22 pm on Dec. 10, 2006[br]<br>Let’s look at the evidence – this man has the ability to churn out yards of meaningless statistics and assorted gardbage. He has the belief that what he claims is undoubtedly the gospel truth in the face of overwhelming counter evidence.
He has shown the capacity to ignore all questions put to him, responding to reasonable requests with more random statements of his creed.
He is plainly totally detached from the real world, devoid of humour and impervious to criticism.
There is no question that this man should be the next Chancellor of the Exchequer !
AP<br>
:lol:
December 11, 2006 at 13:23 #32550Cormack15 writes (Dec. 9, 5:53pm, page 13):<br>“Beginning to have an ’emperoro’s new clothes’ feel to it this Alan. And we all had such high hopes.â€ÂÂ
December 11, 2006 at 14:12 #32551MR. RIDLEY CAN YOU PLEASE ADVISE JUST ONE BETTING ADVICE PRIOR TO ANY EVENT STARTING OR IS YOUR SO CALLED code breaker ONLY KNOWN AFTER IT HAS WON ITS EVENT ????????????????????????<br>
December 11, 2006 at 14:15 #32552
AnonymousInactive- Total Posts 17716
AR
Still no sign of anything before the race, despite your previous promises re Saturday/today.<br> If your so convinced, surely you could do that – or are you banking on us losing the will to live in the meantime?
December 11, 2006 at 15:13 #32553LetsGetRacing writes (Dec. 9, 7:52pm, page 13):<br>“Sandpiper, he is trying to make people believe in a racketeering operation which simply doesn’t exist, by using meaningless numbers and a language which, one assumes, equates closely to English.
“The only problem is that those with even the smallest amount of common sense can see that the man is, to be fair, a complete and utter fruitcake. The sad thing is he doesn’t realise it himself, preferring instead to live in a world of delusional corruption where the grass grows pink, birds fly backwards and Peter Andre and Jordan are actually intelligent, likeable people.â€ÂÂ
December 11, 2006 at 16:48 #32554AGAIN IM ASKING YOU FOR AN EXAMPLE PRIOR TO ANY EVENT STARTING. THE CODE SELECTION PLEASE!!! I PUT 3 OF MY OWN CODE BREAKERS UP PRIOR TO RACING TODAY, SADLY YOUR CARTEL STOPPED ONE FROM FROM RACING, I.E. NON RUNNER ALSO THEY MUST HAVE GOT TO THE CONNECTIONS OF THE HORSE COMING IN SECOND AT 5/2 BUT GLADLY THE OTHER SELECTION WAS ALLOWED TO WIN AT 2/1 (( SPOT THE CODE MR.RIDLEY ?? THE NUMBER 2)) I CONSIDER MY SELF A BIT OF AN IDIOT BUT I HAD THE BALLS TO OPEN MYSELF UP TO BE SHOT AT BY POSTING MY OWN CODE BREAKERS FOR TODAY. I THINK IF YOU WAS A MAN YOU WOULD DO THE SAME. WELL WHATS IT TO BE???? MAN OR MYTH??????
December 11, 2006 at 16:51 #32555Watch out Mr Ridley, it looks like you have competition.
unless you have unlocked the code in Alan Ridley and morphed yourself into Bruce Goldmayer :biggrin:
(Edited by Dolus at 4:52 pm on Dec. 11, 2006)
December 11, 2006 at 17:16 #32556Dolus,<br>Yes, small world.<br>AR
December 11, 2006 at 17:21 #32557dave jay writes (Dec. 9, 9:17, page 13);<br>“.. I am far too lazy to work out all of this code stuff. I’m far too busy ponsing around with primitive ratings (same as Corm and carlisle et al) to get too heavily involved. I would prefer to see the winners posted before the race before I dive in.
â€ÂÂ
December 11, 2006 at 17:28 #32558Dear Omnipotent betting code being of the gamble google, there are seventeen 9/2 shots tomorrow if I divide that by the Important number page 2327849378 and multiply it by the size of my todger I notice there is a key in my casio calculator, if I use it will the cartel send in Escobar and string me up?
I’ve only just read this and it’s probably about the funniest/most disturbing thing I have ever read!! The casio calculator comment is priceless
December 11, 2006 at 18:20 #32559evens posted twice (Dec.11, 2:12 and 4:48, page 14):<br>Regarding disclosure on this forum. Nothing AR posts on this forum is off-the-cuff. Therefore, now revealed, at a private meeting that took place over a year ago, one particular code chief raised the question: “Alan, how will you answer a repetitive question from a new forum member (ie, joined after the author) that has already been asked.â€ÂÂ
December 11, 2006 at 18:53 #32560The post from Dolus exposes this whole thread as noting more than SPAM. The other web site comes from a stable of rip-offs and cons.
Please delete this thread now for the sake of TRF. Credibility is everything. <br>
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.