Home › Forums › Horse Racing › Mark Johnston’s thoughts on Scenic Blast
- This topic has 160 replies, 33 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 10 months ago by
InTheKnow.
- AuthorPosts
- June 22, 2009 at 23:10 #11854
Taken from his website…
I think you all know that I’m not one of the ‘smoking syringe’ theorists and that I, generally, believe that British racing is not only the ‘cleanest’ racing in the world but it is, in my opinion, one of the cleanest sports. However, I still can’t help but wonder how it is possible to get a son of a moderate National Hunt sire, which in turn is a son of Saddler’s Wells, to look like a cross between Alan Wells and a Quarter Horse and to win a Group 1 race over five furlongs. I suppose we can only conclude that they must be much better trainers.
June 22, 2009 at 23:24 #235846His last line is the way it is IMO. That said the testers will always be one step behind the drug cheats and it’s in evidence in global racing every day.
June 22, 2009 at 23:32 #235848Wonder what he thinks of Nicky Henderson having just been found guilty of doping and facing a possible 5 year ban for breach of rule 200. Lets have "Braveheart" go after one of his own for a change.
June 22, 2009 at 23:33 #235849I’m no vet or chemist, but can there really be a drug that can turn a plodder into a rocket? I’d have thought not. Surely there’s a limit to how much a medication can make a horses’ body do that he wasn’t able to without.
Any horse that can win a top sprint with medication must be pretty bloody good beforehand.What’s the pedigree on the dam’s side? Is that where the speed comes from?
June 22, 2009 at 23:47 #235851Steroids i think Insomniac. Wasnt one of their previous runners somewhat tainted?
I wasnt there but did the horse in question looked a bit "pumped up"?
June 22, 2009 at 23:52 #235852Takeover Target was trained on steroids for a while wasn’t he? I remember the furore back in 2006…
I’m torn on this really. It is great to see an International flavour at Royal Ascot, but I can’t help but feel sorry for the "home guard" if these prizes are going to horses that have been trained on drugs that have given them an unfair advantage. To what extent this is the case and what advantage it confers, I really don’t know – but like Johnston, I have my doubts.
I would be very interested to hear what Adrian has to say on this matter, as he is obviously one of the key figures in getting these horses to run over here.
June 22, 2009 at 23:52 #235853Wow Clive, that’s some drug then. This (as you may have gathered) is an area I’m completely ignorant about, but is it possible to turn any old slow-boat into a top speedball?
It seems rather like turning Jo Brand into Venus Williams.June 23, 2009 at 00:00 #235857Should the Americans have similar concerns when European horses clean up at the Breeders Cup? Didn’t a UK trained horse win the other Group 1 sprint at Ascot last week.
June 23, 2009 at 00:20 #235867Takeover Target it was TDK and traces were found at one stage. Simple fact is that the bulk build up will remain after the drugs have washed out. Of course, the inevitable response will predictable if the point is raised….
insomniac…the jo Brand analogy boggle the mind
June 23, 2009 at 00:25 #235869I can only speak of what I know concerning Scenic Blast
a) Danny Morton told the BHA before he shipped that he’d not been on performance enhancing medication.
b) In Australia they have out of competition testing as well as post-race testing so they are as stringent, if not more so, than us.
c) Scenic Blast has past all BHA testing regimes
d) He is trained differently to a lot of horses over here. The Aussies work their sprinters over very short distances (usually less than 4 furlongs) and, apart from specific hit outs, their work is designed not to overtax them.
e) Danny uses special blankets which, when linked to his computer, enable him to work out exactly how fast the horse has been going in different parts of the workout and what pulse rates the horse was clocking. A bit like Mike de Kock he trys to bring some new scientific methods to the game.
f) They bring their own feed with them (well known brands in Australia) maybe their feed companies are doing a good job.
f) I’m sure there are lots of our top sprinters who may be stoutely
bred. Wasn’t Sakhee’s Secret by Sakhee – an Arc winner?June 23, 2009 at 00:35 #235874I’m not one of the ‘smoking syringe’ theorists
Me neither. Barmy idea. Even if you got the horse to put the syringe in its mouth, you’d never be able to light it.
June 23, 2009 at 00:44 #235875Thanks Adrian.
Maybe it is down to the way they are trained then. I certainly hope so….
June 23, 2009 at 01:14 #235884b) In Australia they have out of competition testing as well as post-race testing so they are as stringent, if not more so, than us.
This IMHO is key – in the UK any yard can be subject to a visit from the various authorities and drugs testers to test horses in training (how often do we hear of "dawn raids" at Pipes etc?). However any horse not registered in training will not be subject to any drugs testing.
Would have far more confidence in the Australian and American ways of doing things – particularly after the stories I’ve heard and the way our trainers talk about "strengthening up" etc from 2 to 3 – it comes naturally of course but who’s to say it’s not in some way medically aided?
June 23, 2009 at 01:46 #235892Whatever the case it’s strong stuff for one of our most high profile trainers to be uttering in public. Typically forthright.
June 23, 2009 at 02:01 #235895There have been many instances of top sprinters being sired by stallions who exhibited plenty of stamina on the racecourse.
Abernant, The Tetrarch, Abergwaun and Marchand D’Or are four that come to mind. All their sires were best at 12f plus.
June 23, 2009 at 02:39 #235900Are all the best horses in Oz Sprinters? Why dont they come over and try to win our middle distance races too? Could it be that they know our sprinters are not as good (for whatever reason) and so they are specifically training horses for speed.
June 23, 2009 at 02:52 #235902The trouble is that when the HRA look to tackle drug problems they face resistance from the training community who deny the problem exists.
Take this quote from one member of the training ranks:
"
is using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. There’s no evidence that milkshakes are a problem here. I think the HRA is more concerned about pandering to foreign racing jurisdictions than our own."
The guy making that quote is a certain, erm, M Johnston.
http://www.horseandhound.co.uk/competit … aid=115950
As an aside, does anyone else find it interesting that those found with illicit substances, save for the pending(?) Henderson case, by strange coincidence just happen to be those at the top of the HRA hitlist in the first place?
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.