Home › Forums › Horse Racing › Harry wins another million
- This topic has 39 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 11 months ago by
Shadow Leader.
- AuthorPosts
- May 10, 2007 at 09:43 #57293
tdk. tut tut
May 11, 2007 at 13:51 #57295Well theres clearly one rule for some and normal rules for the rest of us as ther are clear limits for what others can withdraw per month as wit has already stated but the Racing Post have a photo of Harry recieving the kite for £2.million and of course the odd £40 grand in one hit!
Nice to see Glenn Gill his mate in the photo.
Surely not the same Glenn Gill who was allegedly involved with the Avanti Express doping scandal at Plumpton.
Oh dear I think it is!Perhaps Glenn will now re inburse the layers at Portsmouth greyhound track with what he has owed them for years!
May 20, 2007 at 11:26 #57297Harry "the dog" Findlay has done it again!
May 23, 2007 at 09:26 #57299Seagull, if Harry owed Clarkson, Charlie Miller or anyone else money, do you not think they’d ask him for it!? And for the record, John Poulter still owes Harry over £120k from over 16 years ago.
Like many others seagull, Harry’s success appears to be killing you. If only people really knew how much he’s won on football and tennis in the last 10 years, suicide rates across the country would go through the roof.
Harry has hidden from no-one in his life and would be the easiest man on the planet to find if he owed anybody a shilling.
Everyone knows Glen Gill had nothing to do with any doping scandal, and unless you want to end up in court, I would refrain from suggesting he did, in your posts.
Seagull your words seem to be from a bitter and very jealous person….I hope you can get on with your life, and any future success Harry has doesn’t cause you to have sleepless nights.
Yours respectfully AW.
Ps. If Glen Gill owes 1 penny to anyone, let alone Pompey layers, I’ll donate £100k to the RGT.<br>
May 23, 2007 at 11:51 #57303Harry’s too busy laying Milan for telephone numbers, my names Alex.
May 23, 2007 at 11:57 #57304Quote: from Maver1ck on 12:51 pm on May 23, 2007[br]Harry’s too busy laying Milan for telephone numbers, my names Alex.
Findlay?
Harry is my hero for betting in telephone numbers.
May 23, 2007 at 12:03 #57306Quote: from Maver1ck on 12:51 pm on May 23, 2007[br]Harry’s too busy laying Milan for telephone numbers, my names Alex.<br>
As if I needed another reason to hope the scousers get their comeuppance!
May 23, 2007 at 12:16 #57307DJ. Why would this give you another reason? Please elaborate.
May 23, 2007 at 12:36 #57308Quote: from thedarkknight on 1:25 pm on May 23, 2007[br]Maybe he just wants to be spared yet another  fawning "look at how much good old ‘Arry won" article in the Racing Post?
And on this thread!
May 23, 2007 at 13:05 #57309Thanks TDK, in my absence you have summed up my feelings perfectly.
May 23, 2007 at 22:03 #57310Quote: from Seagull on 3:51 pm on May 11, 2007[br]
Surely not the same Glenn Gill who was allegedly involved with the Avanti Express doping scandal at Plumpton.
Oh dear I think it is!Oh dear I think it isn’t!
May 24, 2007 at 09:07 #57311Shadow Leader<br>Avanti Express was indeed found to be drugged at Exeter and Livley Knight was the horse found to be tested positive at Plumpton.
They were both found to be have given acetylpromazine (acp) this drug is known to make horses run poorly.
On the 7 March 1997 Avanti Express was reported by jockey Jamie Osborne as never moving well at any stage and was pulled up.<br>The horse was noted by the betting ring inspector as a notable drifter in the market.<br>The stewards ordered a urine test and the banned substance ACP was found.
Lively Knight was sent off a 1/7 favourite at Plumpton in a 3 runner race on 10 march 2007.<br>Jockey Leighton Aspell reported the same type of comments in that the horse was never travelling at any stage and despite the stewards not bothering with an enquiry a urine test detected the drug acp had been administered.<br>Both jockeys were charged along with a Mr Glenn Gill and others but the Crown Court Trial fell apart.<br>So depending on ones views Mr Gill has either got away with his involvement or was a totally innocent man that had been set up.;)
May 24, 2007 at 09:39 #57312Quote: from Seagull on 10:07 am on May 24, 2007[br]<br>So depending on ones views Mr Gill has either got away with his involvement or was a totally innocent man that had been set up.;)
Surely "no case to answer" only leaves one conclusion?
May 24, 2007 at 11:10 #57313There are many seagulls in Brighton, but one more post mentioning lies about Harry, Glen or the ridiculous trial which was literally laughed out of court, I promise you faithfully we will find the one were looking for.
The reason I’ve been forced to resort to such measures is due to the fact that there is no telephone number for the racing forum for me to call.
Sincerely, AW.
May 24, 2007 at 11:15 #57314Steady on Maverick, your allowed to voice opinions on here… You can be a tough guy as well if you like ;) :o
May 24, 2007 at 12:32 #57315"Harry’s too busy laying Milan for telephone numbers, my names Alex. "
He’s obviously not as cute at football punting as he is on the horses then!!<br>
May 24, 2007 at 12:54 #57316Maver1ck/Alan/Glenn/Harry
Seagull’s 2 posts have not stated that Mr Gill was guilty. Indeed in the first one, the word allegedly is highlighted in bold so as to alert us to the fact that it was merely an allegation while the seocnd one gives two possible reasons for the outcome of the trial, one being that he was an innocent man who was set up.
So calm down will you
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.