- This topic has 40 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 2 days, 3 hours ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Small chance but keep up the wishful thinking
after last night and your book of half a biscuit I thought I’d buy some this morning
Member since March 2008Did you see the goal the ref ruled out for United Ginge.??
If that was the right decision then take a look at the goal West Brom scored against Liverpool at Anfield and tell me the difference.? If anything the West Brom goal is much more of a foul.
So many big mistakes but I have faith that it will improveMember since March 2008The ref disallows a goal by Man U (the team you say refs are easy on) that could possibly have gone the other way… and you still find something wrong.
value is everythingI’m being non biased
I’m showing the error made against Liverpool and the United goal as an example. You are correct the United one could have easily been a goal yet judged a foul yet the West Brom goal judged nothing wrong
PS did you see what that fool Clattenburg stated.?Member since March 2008“He (Klopp) is wrong to suggest there is an aura around United that sees them given favourable decisions. There used to be when Fergie was there, but that has eased massively since he left”.
Firstly, admitting there was bias. Secondly, “eased”, not erased….
Not that it is anything we didn’t already know
Like I said earlier on the thread bordering on corrupt is being lightMember since March 2008Biased people don’t know they’re biased, Nathan. It’s a sub-concious thing. Your subconcious mind wants it to be wrong therefore you think it is wrong.
Like a lot of fans and managers – you’re seeing any borderline decision that’s gone against your team as an error of judgement or even deliberately wrong decision.
Classic bias.
value is everythingHave you actually seen the West Brom goal?
all I am saying is that it was more a foul than the goal that got ruled out for Man Utd
if you are that blind to not understand that you are biased to thinking that I’m biasMember since March 2008Your comment doesn’t even make sense
one of those goals was an error of judgement it has to be because one was given a goal (the worse foul) and one was ruled out (less of a foul) now one of those must have been an error of judgement
Just admit you haven’t seen the West Brom goal.Member since March 2008Classic your talking shite
What about what Clatterburg said.?
A ref even said they were bias toward United in the Ferguson years, games he refereed in
The man in black, the one stood in the middle, with a whistle in his mouth
you going to tell him he is wrong too…
Member since March 2008are you saying that the ref made the right decision in not ruling out the West Brom goal?
are you saying that the ref made the right decision in ruling out the Man Utd goal?Member since March 2008Clatter’ is often controversial so I don’t care what he says.
Yes, I’ve seen the West Brom goal and yes I believe the ref made the right decision in not ruling it out. It was a borderline decision but imo a 60/40, much less borderline than the Man U disallowed goal 48/52. But yes I believe the ref made the right decision there too.
Why would I be biased towards you, Nathan? Got nothing against you my friend…
Could it be your sub-concious bias making you think that my bias is making me think you’re biased? value is everythingIt’s what the thread is all about.
ie We all have sub-concious bias, but the more a punter realises he / she could be biased… the less biased the punter is likely to be-
My point was when a punter is a fan of a team he / she’s surely likely to be more biased with bets. Whether that’s for his team or against biggest rivals.
value is everythingI have to disagree with your judgement over those goals.
If those goals happen in the same match with the same ref then they are either both goals or both ruled outMember since March 2008
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.