- This topic has 429 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 8 months ago by
.
- Posts
Wed 2 March
apache dawn up
scarlett heart 3rd @7/2
my mentor up3 sel=3 ew doubles stake £6.00
loss on day £6.00
bank to c/f £93.00
Thurs 3 April
elusive dream won 7/2
punta galera won 11/4650 kempt had 8 runners but j/sec fav one of which won but left race alone.
so just the 1 ew double
won £17.51bank to c/f £110.51
Seagull,
These EW doubles are going very well indeed, proving that such bets are probably as good a system to follow as anyone could hope for in view of today’s tighter margins.
I know you have to do a bit of work to keep an eye on the markets, but you shouldn’t have much difficulty getting on for reasonable stakes since you are backing doubles.
You don’t see many bets these days where the punter gets a slight edge without wading through the form book and opening multiple betting accounts to forage for scraps of value.
I cannot see any reason why the bank will not continue to grow steadily.
Well done, indeed.Artemis,
I take no credit for these.
It is nothing new.It is something bookmakers have no control over as the markets are formed from betfair and from the race tracks. The beauty is both these sources do not include ew betting so it is totally governed by the overall rules ie 5th odds for the sec fav to win or get placed.
However you will get barred from doing them just with one bookmaker all the time as all bookmakers know that overall they cannot win.
Doing these has caused more bans that anything else.
Ladbrokes .com limited me to £5.00 max solely from doing these with them. I used to have a ‘pop up’ informing me this when I went on line with them!You need to go to the next step and that is to for all intents and purposes to have single ew bets.
For example £50.ew with bookie 1 then calculate any winnings and place the winnings and another £50.00 ew on the next sec fav in 8 runners races as for example £83.00 ew with bookie no 2.
So to those who monitor accounts at on line bookmakers you are only doing single ew bets.
Carry on like this and you can get on most of the time.
On Day 2 start with bookie no 3.
You need around 10 on line firms.
Drawback is you need to watch the live markets closely otherwise if you do these before going to work some days they have market moves and no one can predict what horse may start fav or indeed sec fav.
I leave these races alone when they have joint or co 1st favs and joint or co 2nd favs.
That website I previously listed works out any bets and informs you what the next stake should be. I have that listed in my favs for quick reference.
pm me for any further details but i.m.h.o it is far the best system bet ever devised. Bookmakers have no control over it unless they reduce the precentages.
Friday 4 April
Big Bucks won 11/4
Avontuur u/p
First Order u/p3 selections = 3 ew doubles
stake £6.00
lost £6.00bank £104.51
I thought it might be hard work, ducking and diving a bit to keep ahead of the ‘knock-back’.
Many years ago, the betting office I ran was visited now and then by a couple of scruffy characters who were each-way thieves as well as trying on the ‘slow count’ for dog races. They were both as thick as bulls lugs, but someone cleverer than they must have told them to invest the proceeds of their criminal activity on these each way bets. So, yes it’s as old as the hills, but it works.
Apologies if this has been discussed earlier as I haven’t read all the posts but are these bets best settled by the bookies default of Win-win Place-place or is Equally Divided (‘Eachway all eachway’) preferential?
Or, as I suspect, do both perform similarly in the long term?
The knowledge that ‘dead eight’ EW doubles favour the punter may be as old as the hills but this is another interesting real-time trial from Seagull, particularly his suspicion-diverting method of placing them
Carry on chaps
Drone,
Overall both methods work and not suprisingly they both make more or less the same returns.Sat 5th April
there were 5 races today that had 8 runners with no fav or second fav had joint or co favs.
they were
Takeroc 2nd 5/2
Sharp Nephew 1st 5/1
Benedetto 3rd 7/2
Raimond Ridge 2nd 3/1
Internatnationaldebut 3rd 6/45 selections =10 ew doubles
stake £20.00returns were inc stake
2.25
2.55
2.40
1.95 loss 0.05
2.55
2.40
1.95 loss 0.05
2.72
2.21
2.08
profit on day £3.06bank to c/f £107.57
Mon 07-Apr
PLU 14:20 Barodine – 2nd @ 11/4
PLU 16:20 Pacco – 1st @ 7/2
KEL 16:30 Great Jane – 1st @ 4/1
PLU 16:50 Present M’Lord – 1st @ 5/2
KEM 17:10 Fun In The Sun – 5th @ 11/410 x £1 each-way doubles = £20 stake
Returns (incl stake)
AB: 2.64
AC: 2.79
AD: 2.33
AE: 0.00
BC: 25.56
BD: 18.30
BE: 0.00
CD: 20.20
CE: 0.00
DE: 0.00Total return £71.82
Profit on day £51.82
Bank to c/f = £159.39
Cheeers David can u do them until I get back going to Jersey next Sunday for the 1 week.
No problem Seagull
Tue 08-Apr
STH 15:30 Irish Conection – 3rd @ 11/4
STH 16:30 Lethal – 2nd @ 9/41 x £1 each-way double = £2 stake
Returns (incl stake) £2.25
Profit on day £0.25
Bank to c/fwd 159.64
*The 16:00 race at Southwell also had 8 runners but no selection due to joint 2nd favs (one of which was placed)
Thanks for this.
I am afraid I haven’t got a lot spare time at the moment.
Your help is appreciated.
Regards- Matron
Wed 09-Apr
LUD 14:50 Majorca – 4th @ 5/2
TOW 17:00 Rydal Park – 1st @ 9/4
KEM 20:20 Safari Sundowner – 7th @ 5/23 x £1 each-way double = £6 stake
Returns (incl stake) £0.00
Loss on day -£6.00
Bank to c/fwd 153.64
Thu 10-Apr
FON 17:45 Urban Rebel – UR @ 5/2
No doubles today so as you were:
Bank to c/fwd 153.64
Fri 11-Apr
MUS 14:00 Just The Lady – 3rd @ 10/3
MUS 16:15 Prince Kalamoun – 2nd @ 9/4
ASC 17:15 Mossville – 5th @ 10/33 x £1 each-way double = £6.00 stake
Returns (incl stake) £2.42
Loss for day £3.58
Bank to c/fwd 150.06
Sat 12-Apr
DON 15:35 Medicine Path – 1st @ 9/2
KEM 17:35 Coda Agency – 5th @ 2/1
WOL 21:20 Art Exhibition – 2nd @ 3/13 x £1 each-way double = £6.00 stake
Returns (incl stake) £3.04
Loss for day £2.96
Bank to c/fwd 147.10
NB – the 15:20 race at KEM also had 8 runners but with joint-2nd-favs so not included:
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.