The home of intelligent horse racing discussion
The home of intelligent horse racing discussion

Epsom Derby or Arc De Triomphe – better race?

Home Forums Horse Racing Epsom Derby or Arc De Triomphe – better race?

Viewing 17 posts - 1 through 17 (of 37 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1376572
    Austin
    Participant
    • Total Posts 151

    Which race is more quality and tougher to win? Discuss

    #1376573
    Avatar photophil walker
    Participant
    • Total Posts 1374

    Neither, the Cheltenham Gold Cup wins every time :-)

    #1376574
    Avatar photoDegaussed
    Participant
    • Total Posts 566

    The Arc. It’s the best of the best from around the continent, if not the globe, usually at the end of a long season.

    #1376576
    Avatar photoraymo61
    Participant
    • Total Posts 6330

    The EPSOM DERBY is the best race in the world!!
    I will not be swayed in this!!
    The ultimate test of a three year old thoroughbred racehorse!!
    The atmosphere is fantastic.
    It is also sooooooo tough to win because of the above.
    You have to have a horse with balance ,courage,staying power and speed and a temperament to cope with all the broohaha before the race. To expect or want this in a three year old so early in his life is a BIG BIG ask!!

    #1376580
    ham
    Participant
    • Total Posts 3491

    To win a derby you dont need to be an out and out group 1 horse, you just need to beat a bunch of unexposed 3yos, some years the form is strong, some years its horrid, the track at there age is the testing part.

    The arc is a thorough group 1 race year in year out with the best of any age, the track may not be as testing, but its a better quality race overall

    #1376586
    Avatar photoadmin
    Keymaster
    • Total Posts 1181

    Without checking I’d be very confident the last 20 Arc winners would have a significantly better average rating than Derby winners.

    But the Derby is the greater race.

    cormack15

    #1376588
    Avatar photoKris
    Participant
    • Total Posts 1468

    I’m not a big fan of these questions, as it is surely a matter of opinion, but I’ll give my own opinion for what it’s worth.

    It’s not a particularly difficult call. The Arc is the bigger race by far. It’s a bigger occasion globally, it has vastly superior fields, and has more of a sense of occasion. It is just better and bigger in every sense.

    It pains me to say that, as growing up, The Derby meant the world, running home from School to soak everything up, everything about it. It sadly lost a lot of its lustre, after the midweek switch, a switch it has never really recovered from.

    I hope this comes across the right way, I still love The Derby, I’ve attended all bar three of them since 1990, but it just doesn’t have the same significance as it did then. To think it was once one of the ‘crown jewels’ when it came to broadcasting rights. We now have a generation who have never heard of it in this country, which is a shame.

    I hope in time, this can change, but for now, claiming the derby to be the greater race, well only someone stuck in the past, would claim that.

    Enough of my opinion. Instead of just throwing it out there ‘Austin’, would it be so difficult to give your thoughts in the initial post, and the reasons for asking? It seems strange to start a thread and not give your own thoughts. Why would that be?

    #1376595
    wasps41
    Participant
    • Total Posts 1161

    The Arctic

    #1376596
    wasps41
    Participant
    • Total Posts 1161

    Arc even

    #1376599
    Avatar photoraymo61
    Participant
    • Total Posts 6330

    Looks like I am in the minority but hey ho we are all allowed an opinion !!

    Every year THE Derby brings a tear to my eye and I am not that sentimental but I will not be swayed!! :cry:

    #1376603
    Austin
    Participant
    • Total Posts 151

    @Kris – Sorry yes I should hv given my opinion in the OP. I am someone new to racing and but from my limited knowledge, Derby has much larger history and significance. There are derby race in most countries emulating the Epsom race. That alone makes Derby a very special race.

    In terms of quality, Arc is better bcoz it is competed amongst proven G1 horses from all ages. It also has significant international presence, which lacks in derby. However, the track in Epsom is much tougher compared to Longchamp. So its a gruelling test for 3 year olds.

    Lets put it this way, Derby is the greatest test for 3 yo horses. Arc is the best G1 race for all ages.

    #1376610
    Avatar photoYahoo
    Participant
    • Total Posts 663

    I’m in the majority, I think that the Arc is the toughest race to win. The Derby is a race for the Coolmore, Godolphin, Juddmonte tribes. The chance of a small owner taking the prize are limited. Always the chance their star will be bought off them if their pride and joy shows its a danger to the powerhouses. The Arc however brings in other owners from Europe and further afield who aren’t scared to take on the challenge. And of course the open age race means many more quality horses are eligible to run, including fillies and mares. I wouldn’t mind owning a Derby winner but an Arc winner would be more satisfying.

    #1376615
    LD73
    Participant
    • Total Posts 3198

    The better quality race is clearly the Arc because (generally) you have to take on the who’s who of Europe’s best all aged middle distance horses (unless they happen to be geldings) which usually includes the Derby winner and more recently top challengers from Japan.

    Although strangely I would argue that the Derby is the toughest and better race to win as it is run on a course that is the ultimate test of a racehorse because it comes too early in their 3 yr old career and thats even before you take into account the rivals you may face….but I guess that is an entirely different question.

    #1376620
    Avatar photoGingertipster
    Participant
    • Total Posts 33238

    Couple of years ago I looked back at the latest 5 renewals, noting Timeform Performance Ratings put up by the winners, seconds and thirds of all Group 1 races.

    The Arc came out the absolute best with an average Performance Rating for the winner of 132.
    The Derby came out as the best 3 year old race, winner’s average Timeform Performance Rating of 126.

    But one is restricted to three year olds (and very few fillies take part) and in June of their year; the other for any age (bar 2) and any sex – greater number of good horses able to run… And horses usually progress through the year too. Come Arc day even Derby winners are usually capable of better form than in early June. Four and older aged horses have generally got to their established level and are able to show their career bests.

    They are totally different races.

    Value Is Everything
    #1376637
    buckers
    Participant
    • Total Posts 716

    It is a hard one to call as to which is the better race, they are such different tests. As fircwhich one is the bigger race, I think it is easily The Arc. I would have perhaps thought differently Twenty or thirty years ago, but for a variety of reasons, The Derby just is not thexrace it once was. It used to be such a significant occasion on the sporting calendar, but not now

    #1376640
    Avatar photoNathan Hughes
    Participant
    • Total Posts 32245

    Reading this thread you could switch the names in the posts to the FA Cup and Champions League and it would fit in well.

    Blackbeard to conquer the World

    #1376644
    Avatar photoGingertipster
    Participant
    • Total Posts 33238

    No Nathan,

    Foreign managers are no longer interested in the FA Cup and the big clubs often play a second eleven.

    People are still interested in who wins the Derby. You get “first eleven”, ie the very best horses available running in it – every trainer/owner (“managers”) with a horse good enough to take part (let alone win) will run.

    Value Is Everything
Viewing 17 posts - 1 through 17 (of 37 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.