The home of intelligent horse racing discussion
The home of intelligent horse racing discussion

Prix de l’Arc de Triomphe 2017

Home Forums Big Races – Discussion Prix de l’Arc de Triomphe 2017

Viewing 17 posts - 307 through 323 (of 366 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1319963
    clivexx
    Blocked
    • Total Posts 2702

    Lots of differing opinions. One thing to consider is why so many fillies,especially 3yos have won so many recent arcs. The wfa may well be too much skewed in their favour.

    Why should it be more than any other race ?? Fillies do not habitually beat colts in group ones

    Its nothing more than the fact there have been some outstanding fillies. Too much is read into stats at times

    Enable is by some margin the best middle distance horse in europe. There is nothing more complicated to it than that but its extraordinary that some should seek to crab a perfect and totally dominant season. I also believe that she certainly hasnt been fully tested as yet and there is more to come

    #1319966
    nwalton
    Participant
    • Total Posts 3570

    maybe why the younger brigade win more arcs nowdays is because,the best 3yo’s of previous year are shipped off to stud earlier than in years go by

    treve stayed in training and won two on bounce

    #1319974
    Avatar photoPants
    Participant
    • Total Posts 647

    Lots of differing opinions. One thing to consider is why so many fillies,especially 3yos have won so many recent arcs. The wfa may well be too much skewed in their favour.

    Why should it be more than any other race ?? Fillies do not habitually beat colts in group ones

    Its nothing more than the fact there have been some outstanding fillies. Too much is read into stats at times

    Enable is by some margin the best middle distance horse in europe. There is nothing more complicated to it than that but its extraordinary that some should seek to crab a perfect and totally dominant season. I also believe that she certainly hasnt been fully tested as yet and there is more to come

    Here, here! Absolute nonsense to suggest she’s not an outstanding filly. The only time she was taken on during the season by Rhododendron in The Oaks, she found another gear.

    She’s is the complete package and should and will in my opinion go down as an all time great. Hopefully she stays in training so we can enjoy her for another year. I would expect her to improve next season.

    #1319975
    Avatar photoGingertipster
    Participant
    • Total Posts 34704

    Only 6 horses older than 3 have the race since 1994, Derek.

    That’s a ratio of three 3yos to every one older winner. I guess you could say…older horses rarely take the race, no?

    In that time period which three year old Arc winners should not have been good enough to win an Arc?

    Come to that:
    Which filly Arc winners should not have been good enough to win an Arc?

    If there is a discrepency then it’s surely only a matter of a pound here and there and basically made no difference to recent impressive Arc winners.

    The allowance that is extremely unfair is 2 year olds having a massive advantage taking on their elders. Why more don’t try baffles me.

    Value Is Everything
    #1319981
    Avatar photoVoleur
    Participant
    • Total Posts 656

    I agree with Clive that the stats don’t paint the full picture in any way satisfactory.

    In accordance with what Gingertipster is saying, how many older horses have been good enough to win an Arc ahead of the various 3 year old fillies that won in those particular years? I can’t recall any instance where the winning filly was definitely an inferior horse to one of her older opponents.

    The thing about older horses is, the best three year old colts – and sometimes fillies – rarely go on to have four year old careers. If they have a successful Classic campaign they will more than likely be shipped off to the breeding sheds so the circle can begin anew.

    Generally it is the underachievers who go on to have careers after three.

    #1319984
    LostSoldier3
    Blocked
    • Total Posts 1874

    It’s hard to tell though, isn’t it? We can only guess at the progression these mares might have made from 3-4 (if any).

    You look back and you remember Danedream, Treve etc as great horses because of what they did in the Arc. Perhaps a combination of the visual memories and the usual swirl of post-race hype makes you forget the ridiculous weight differential and think they were further superior than the reality of it.

    Would Danedream have won off level weights against So You Think and St Nicholas Abbey? Would Enable have beaten Cloth Of Stars or Ulysses off level weights at Longchamp? Would Zarkava have beaten Youmzain and Soldier Of Fortune?

    I don’t believe you’d make ‘yes!’ shorter than 5/6 off levels for any of those.

    #1319985
    Avatar photostevecaution
    Blocked
    • Total Posts 8241

    Only 6 horses older than 3 have the race since 1994, Derek.

    That’s a ratio of three 3yos to every one older winner. I guess you could say…older horses rarely take the race, no?

    In that time period which three year old Arc winners should not have been good enough to win an Arc?

    Come to that:
    Which filly Arc winners should not have been good enough to win an Arc?

    If there is a discrepency then it’s surely only a matter of a pound here and there and basically made no difference to recent impressive Arc winners.

    The allowance that is extremely unfair is 2 year olds having a massive advantage taking on their elders. Why more don’t try baffles me.

    I thought Heartache was well worth a pop at the L’Abbaye after winning The Flying Childers but she had been due a pop at the Cheveley Park instead.

    Maybe there is this child-like belief that these speedy sorts can be a Guineas horse in the Spring but nearly all of them seem to fail.

    Thanks for the good crack. Time for me to move on. Be lucky.

    #1319986
    Avatar photothejudge1
    Participant
    • Total Posts 2251

    The choice of who might be good next season is pure guesswork so if choosing the two I did is being obsessed then your entitled to your opinion as am I. Are you not just proving that a lot of people dislike obrien just because he and coolmore are so successful. The form lines are there for all to see and shows enable to be just over a length better than found who I believe was rated 6 pounds inferior to golden horn by timeform. Nothing to do whether I’m a big fan of obrien or not. Surely bataashs win must be far higher rated than enables.

    Well I don’t dislike O’Briens, in fact a mate of mine is a mate of Tabors. They seem like perfectly reasonable people, just the obsession with their runners gets a bit much sometimes.

    Just think that you can surely do better than nominate a winner of a weak jean luc lagarde and a group three at Leopardstown as the main dangers to enable… it seems to me that there’s always some inherent bias towards the ballydoyle runners, although as you say it’s understandable given their success.

    #1319987
    Avatar photostevecaution
    Blocked
    • Total Posts 8241

    Maybe Capri will be an excellent 1m 6F to 2m horse next season. That doesn’t mean he would have won the Arc.

    As far as I am aware, no St Leger winner has gone on to win the Arc the same year. Ginger has already explained why it’s so hard to do.

    Capri didn’t run to his Leger mark but it was always likely to be tough for him facing older and better horses at the good bit shorter trip. He didn’t bomb out, he simply suffered the fate of several others who have tried a tougher assignment after a couple of tough wins against his own age group.

    It looked a better Leger this year, certainly miles ahead of the slow coaches that turned up to fight it out after Idaho fell last year. Time will tell how good it really was. Stradivarius was dropping from 2 miles and Crystal Ocean may have been a bit unsuited by the extra distance he was covering.

    The biggest mystery I have with Enable is how she was ever beaten by Shutter Speed and Raheen House. That may well be a Trivial Pursuit question of the future.

    I saw Gosden sitting calmly just before the race “Bulling” a sandwich in him. He looked like a man who knew the job was done and it was all about just watching another entry in his personal CV about to take place. Like the British Open, the name was already half engraved on the trophy as they (she actually) hit the line.

    Thanks for the good crack. Time for me to move on. Be lucky.

    #1319994
    Pete2014
    Participant
    • Total Posts 59

    It’s hard to tell though, isn’t it? We can only guess at the progression these mares might have made from 3-4 (if any).

    You look back and you remember Danedream, Treve etc as great horses because of what they did in the Arc. Perhaps a combination of the visual memories and the usual swirl of post-race hype makes you forget the ridiculous weight differential and think they were further superior than the reality of it.

    Would Danedream have won off level weights against So You Think and St Nicholas Abbey? Would Enable have beaten Cloth Of Stars or Ulysses off level weights at Longchamp? Would Zarkava have beaten Youmzain and Soldier Of Fortune?

    I don’t believe you’d make ‘yes!’ shorter than 5/6 off levels for any of those.

    Danedream and Enable are the only fillies to win the Arc and the KG. Treve is one of two fillies in history to win two Arcs. Those were historic achievements. Furthermore Treve and Danedream won big quality races as four year olds sometimes conceding weight. Zarkava won all her races comfortably, beating Goldikova and Da Re Mi off level weights.

    I´ll gladly accept that Taghrooda took advantage of her own weight and the most god awful KG field ever, but that´s not really the case for those other fillies.

    It´s pretty simple imho. We have been blessed with some all time great fillies in Zarkava, Danedream, Treve and Enable recently. Might add Snow Fairy to the list.

    Sometimes they just come in waves. From 1972 to 1983 you had eight fillies win the Arc. Then one win in 24 years. The drought in the KG was even longer. No winner in 29 years.

    #1319995
    Avatar photoTriptych
    Participant
    • Total Posts 18671

    @BigG
    Thanks Graham for your support I couldn’t copy over all the different comments I think quotes were on overload.. but as you said if judge had read my post properly he would have seen that I am anything but an O’Brien fan and I’m always taking him on,I don’t think I have ever tipped up an AOB horse,I am more obsessed with Frankel progeny hands up to that. :yes:

    Anyway was just defending the horse Capri who had a bad day on Sunday. I didn’t have a penny on him.

    Have you ever gone into work judge not feeling 100 per cent?..its hard to put in a good day when you’re under the weather and Capri deserves another chance.

    Lots of common sense talked on here, as it should be on a Forum, if we all agreed it would be boring.. :good: Jac

    Things turn out best for those who make the best of how things turn out...
    #1319999
    Avatar photothejudge1
    Participant
    • Total Posts 2251

    @bigg
    Thanks Graham for your support I couldn’t copy over all the different comments I think quotes were on overload.. but as you said if judge had read my post properly he would have seen that I am anything but an O’Brien fan and I’m always taking him on,I don’t think I have ever tipped up an AOB horse,I am more obsessed with Frankel progeny hands up to that. :yes:

    Anyway was just defending the horse Capri who had a bad day on Sunday. I didn’t have a penny on him.

    Have you ever gone into work judge not feeling 100 per cent?..its hard to put in a good day when you’re under the weather and Capri deserves another chance.

    Lots of common sense talked on here, as it should be on a Forum, if we all agreed it would be boring.. :good: Jac

    almost every day these days jac I don’t feel 100 percent :unsure:

    #1320003
    clivexx
    Blocked
    • Total Posts 2702

    It’s hard to tell though, isn’t it? We can only guess at the progression these mares might have made from 3-4 (if any).

    You look back and you remember Danedream, Treve etc as great horses because of what they did in the Arc. Perhaps a combination of the visual memories and the usual swirl of post-race hype makes you forget the ridiculous weight differential and think they were further superior than the reality of it.

    Would Danedream have won off level weights against So You Think and St Nicholas Abbey? Would Enable have beaten Cloth Of Stars or Ulysses off level weights at Longchamp? Would Zarkava have beaten Youmzain and Soldier Of Fortune?

    I don’t believe you’d make ‘yes!’ shorter than 5/6 off levels for any of those.

    Danedream and Enable are the only fillies to win the Arc and the KG. Treve is one of two fillies in history to win two Arcs. Those were historic achievements. Furthermore Treve and Danedream won big quality races as four year olds sometimes conceding weight. Zarkava won all her races comfortably, beating Goldikova and Da Re Mi off level weights.

    I´ll gladly accept that Taghrooda took advantage of her own weight and the most god awful KG field ever, but that´s not really the case for those other fillies.

    It´s pretty simple imho. We have been blessed with some all time great fillies in Zarkava, Danedream, Treve and Enable recently. Might add Snow Fairy to the list.

    Sometimes they just come in waves. From 1972 to 1983 you had eight fillies win the Arc. Then one win in 24 years. The drought in the KG was even longer. No winner in 29 years.

    Might also be something in that old chestnut that fillies are better in the autumn too but that would hardly apply to Enable

    #1320006
    mickeyjp
    Participant
    • Total Posts 1972

    It probably is just we’ve been blessed with s lot of good fillies plus too many top three year old sent to stud after their three year old campaigns are finished. Danedream couldn’t repeat her performance next year so maybe there is just something in the allowances. Just goes to show what w brilliant horse alleged was. Just look he he beat in his two arcs. Was the top rated horse at that time in the globe.

    #1320009
    clivexx
    Blocked
    • Total Posts 2702

    There is nothing in the allowances. They are there for a reason and endlessly scrutinised. Countless thousands of races have created the template and one Danedream doesnt diminish that

    #1320010
    Avatar photothejudge1
    Participant
    • Total Posts 2251

    Probably the allowances do have some effect, but it would be ridiculous not to see Enable as some sort of outlier. She was the first filly from Uk or Ireland to win the arc after all- I don’t think it’s easy for such types to do so, that’s why I think the Happily tip is somewhat too optimistic.

    #1320012
    Avatar photoTriptych
    Participant
    • Total Posts 18671

    judge wrote:

    almost every day these days jac I don’t feel 100 percent :unsure:

    LOL judge..keep taking the tablets perhaps a few nice winners on Champions Day will ease the pain. :rose: Jac

    Things turn out best for those who make the best of how things turn out...
Viewing 17 posts - 307 through 323 (of 366 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.