The home of intelligent horse racing discussion
The home of intelligent horse racing discussion

2010 Spring General Election

Home Forums Lounge 2010 Spring General Election

Viewing 17 posts - 86 through 102 (of 136 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #295130
    moehat
    Participant
    • Total Posts 10159

    As far as I’m concerned Nick Clegg has shot himself in the foot over the past few days. I have voted Lib/Dem in the past as an alternative to Labour. Never again. I’m also sick of the constant verbal attacking of Gordon Brown. It’s getting too personal, and I find it quite unpleasant.

    #295132
    Avatar photoquixallcrossett
    Participant
    • Total Posts 358

    Quote Jose 1933
    No, there is democracy. The squatter has stated his intention to resign as Labour leader.

    You can’t resist the cheap jibes can you, you’re like a broken record with the needle stuck & furthermore you’re wrong, wrong, wrong as you yourself admitted.

    #295134
    Avatar photoPompete
    Member
    • Total Posts 2390

    Tom Bradby in particular – God, didn’t he looked well miffed

    I thought his piece was amazing.

    I was waiting for him to start jumping up and down shouting…"it’s not fair, it’s not fair and I’m gonna scream and sream and scream until I’m sick" :mrgreen:

    #295136
    jose1993
    Member
    • Total Posts 1228

    Jose, like most of SKY news’ Tory presenters & ITN news journalists ( Tom Bradby in particular – God, didn’t he looked well miffed :lol: ) you are probably enraged, because just when you thought the "deal" was in the bag, BANG ! – auld Broonie throws a big spanner into the works – and Nick Clegg has now opened formal negotiations with the Labour Party. The Rainbow Alliance has a certain ring to it, don’t you think ? :P

    Never count your chickens; that’s what my old granny used to say. :wink:

    Fair enough. I’m not as enraged as Adam Boulton though.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdidz_48fGI

    Best moment of this election so far.

    I’ll have a rainbow alliance happily. Alex Salmond playing a major role in government – you just have to keep laughing if that is the case, surely?

    Still, well done to Gordon for accepting full defeat today. He’s helped Labour a lot today, and more so than if he did it on Friday, so he’s played the game well.

    And just a quick note to the poster who likes quoting me – if I know I’m wrong and I’m admitting I’m wrong, why on earth get riled over someone who liked The Sun’s way of referring to Gordon Brown as a squatter? It’s stupid.

    #295141
    Avatar photoHimself
    Participant
    • Total Posts 3777

    The Sun took the squatter remark from Nick Clegg, who said ( prior to the General Election ), that if Labour came third then Gordon Brown would be no more than a squatter in number 10.

    Gambling Only Pays When You're Winning

    #295144
    insomniac
    Participant
    • Total Posts 1453

    Fascinating times, it’s almost impossible to drag myself away from the TV and internet!
    Now I may well be as accurate a judge of political manoeuvering as I am of horses (ie not that good), but I rather think that Clegg is making a complete and utter balls-up on this.
    He wants a referendum on PR. Yet, the Scottish Labour MPs (correct me on this Scots forumites) are hardly likely to vote for it are they?
    Even if they did, it would still have to get through the House of Lords – may take upwards of a year if other pundits are correct. Can a rainbow-alliance of Labour, LibDems, SNP, Plaid-Cymru, Ulster and Green survive that long?

    Furthermore, after all this brouhaha, all Cameron has to say is "this is what it’s like when you get no party with overall control; this is what you’ll get

    ALL

    the time if you ditch FPTP for PR". And many would agree with him. By playing Brown’s game maybe Clegg is lessening his chances of political reform by handing bullets to the FPTP advocates.

    #295164
    moehat
    Participant
    • Total Posts 10159

    They’re all saying ‘all we want is what’s best for the country’ but all they really want is what’s best for them. I suppose I always knew that about politicians, but it’s still come as a bit of a shock.

    #295166
    Kevin
    Member
    • Total Posts 295

    :) :) :) :)
    I think this is all hilarious. Teddy bears flying everywhere from the Press. Nearly as good as Boulton (thanks for that clip) was Nick Robinson’s fuming face earlier.

    Basically nobody has won this election but the Tories won the most seats. Was it something like 10 million voted Tory and 15 Million voted Labour & Liberal together? I will be very surprised if the tribalism in British politics disappears as long as we have this voting system. I cannot see any way the Liberals could get into bed with the Tories. It would be electoral suicide for them. At the same time I cannot see them getting into bed with the Nationalists which simple Arithmetic would require.

    My bet is a Tory minority government that will fail in a very short time and another election in October. Terrible for the economy but what do the Press care. They created this X Factor election.

    With Brown gone suddenly Labour would look a very different proposition to the fickle public. When you look back it was all there on a plate for Cameron and he blew it against Brown who looks to have done very well. People voted anti Brown rather than pro Cameron or anything on policy.

    Insomniac, I do think that Scottish Labour MPs would support PR. There is a huge anti Tory feeling up here as you can see from 1 Tory seat in 59. Funnily enough the Tories do much better in the Scottish Parliament because of PR.

    :shock: Absolutely gobsmacked to see the Tories now offering a referendum on changing the voting system. I would have thought that was not something Cameron could offer without consultation with the party members. Desperate stuff and might be a step too far for some Tories. Maybe Clegg has played both of against the other superbly and may now go for a loose Tory Coalition.

    #295195
    wit
    Participant
    • Total Posts 2171

    imo the conservatives’ own best interest would be to set the bar so high for clegg that it ends up being the coalition of the losers (lab, lib-dem, and the "no cuts for us" regional parties) who take the flak for the economic hurricane that will hit the UK before brown actually disappears in september.

    cameron can then step in and collect an autumn election.

    the risk is what greater mess that coalition of losers could put the country into over the next six months.

    but the scope for mischief may be limited since the EU won’t touch the UK’s financial problems at the moment.

    imo the election shows the UK’s real problem to be the 52% of the workforce on the public sector payroll – plus the bankers, insurers and similar bailed-out sectors – who seem to think life can go on as before, but financed now not by brown’s credit bubble but by an ever-dwindling tax base of real-wealth producers and ever-dwindling numbers of foreigners prepared to lend to the UK government.

    public sector unions to fight it out with the coalition of the losers over the summer, until enough of the country says "a pox on both their houses".

    #295198
    Avatar photoPompete
    Member
    • Total Posts 2390

    Wit, who won?

    …and why is it the ‘coalition of losers’ can do this?

    #295199
    Kevin
    Member
    • Total Posts 295

    Wit, I very much agree that it might not be a bad thing for the parties that sit this one out in opposition. Bit of a poisoned chalice the way the cards have fallen.

    Personally I would be happy to see Labour not getting involved in some messy alliance with all sorts.

    #295203
    jose1993
    Member
    • Total Posts 1228

    Imo, the Conservative party have gone too far with the attempt to seize power by conceding too much ground. At this point in time do they actually need it? Any other coalition needs nationalist MP’s, which is hardly a good way for Labour to regain seats in England in the near future, so electoral reform is hardly something a Lib/Lab coalition can push through for sure anyway. David Cameron could fight more than well enough from opposition and he could cause another General Election in the Autumn in any scenario. A minority government wouldn’t be a disaster either if he just wants to get in 10 Downing Street somehow.

    Gordon Brown has either pulled off a master-stroke or ruined the Labour party for longer than they have been in power. Time will measure that along with a possible coalition, although any success would have to be very doubtful still.

    Clegg has let down any "new" Lib Dem voters already. He’s shown that his party doesn’t deserve the right to have a huge say in reforming the electoral system. Both major parties are really stupid in agreeing anything about electoral reform. Neither idea will work anyway. The Lib Dems just want the system which suits their own interests bets, and definitely not what suits the nation best. They could damage their selves greatly if they don’t have a referendum on the issue, which would mean teaming up with the Conservative party. The prospect of Clegg allowing some most "un-democratic" things to take place could be deemed quite shameful really given what he said in the leaders debates.

    And the media have been exactly what you’d expect. Murdoch’s mob taking a huge view on one side. Just see Adam Boulton’s various angry rants’ on Sky, or read a Murdoch owned newspaper. The latest Boulton rant was against Ben Bradshaw, someone who I don’t view as worthy of ranting against. But, on the opposite side, you have the likes of Kevin Maguire from the Mirror offering a sad and lonely defence of all things Labour still.

    #295204
    moehat
    Participant
    • Total Posts 10159

    Crumbs; it gets worse. Talk tonight of Iain Duncan Smith and Michael [something of the night]Howard being given cabinet posts to keep the ‘far right’ happy. I thought they were retired, or dead or both. It’s all getting very confusing and farcical. One failed leader gets the push

    and two others return in glory. As my boss said today..I think I want to leave the country..but there’s nowhere to go….

    #295212
    wit
    Participant
    • Total Posts 2171

    Wit, who won?

    …and why is it the ‘coalition of losers’ can do this?

    obviously nobody got 326.

    i’d say 306 was the winner, 258 second, 57 third. SNP fifth on 6 and Plaid Cymru joint seventh with SDLP on 3 each.

    why would they do it?

    a) brown desperate to cling to power to last minute ("dignified exit" my foot)

    b) lab and lib-dems most in common

    c) lab and lib-dems the parties of spending other people’s money, hence best placed to execute compulsory surgery on the public sector

    Cameron could actually offer a far more potent constitutional reform than PR by addressing the West Lothian question – why are there 59 Scottish MPs at Westminster (only one of them Conservative) ?

    no offence to Corm, Grassy, and the other Scottish engines behind TRF :lol:

    #295224
    insomniac
    Participant
    • Total Posts 1453

    Moehat writes:-

    Talk tonight of Iain Duncan Smith and Michael [something of the night]Howard being given cabinet posts to keep the ‘far right’ happy. I thought they were retired, or dead or both. It’s all getting very confusing and farcical. One failed l

    Er, this is one of those cases of the media looking for a story / something else to say without them really knowing (or maybe just ignoring) the background or facts.
    1)Ian Duncan Smith was always earmarked for a post in a Conservative government. So no concession there then.
    2) Michael Howard similarly was earmarked for Justice Secretary. So no concession there then.
    I rather think this story was put about by the BBC’s Michael Crick (correct me if I’m wrong). He’s not the sharpest tool in the box.

    PS Spot on Wit.

    #295228
    Avatar photoPompete
    Member
    • Total Posts 2390

    …the election shows the UK’s real problem to be the 52% of the workforce on the public sector payroll

    :shock: The last time I looked the public sector was about 6 million from a workforce of about 27.5 million.

    Who are these 52% and what do they do?

    #295233
    apracing
    Participant
    • Total Posts 4008

    The public sector 52% refers to GDP, not workforce. The figures were published recently by some independent organisation.

    So this country has a public sector that is bigger than the private sector in economic terms.

    Here’s a random example of why that is the case, plucked from the home page of the Guardian website :

    Children’s Services

    Behaviour and Attendance Intervention Manager

    Ref: CHS048_MAY10

    PO9, £54,609 – £57,477 (inc. LW)

    This is a newly created post in the Inclusion Service. The new manager will lead a number of successful and well established teams ensuring high quality service delivery. You will need to be committed to the inclusion of children and young people, have exceptionally high expectations of what can be achieved, and, be able to take a creative and innovative approach to challenges presented.

    Children’s Services are committed to the implementation of safer recruitment practices.

    For further details of this role please visit http://www.greenwich.gov.uk/jobs to download an application pack and apply online.

    Closing date: 21 May 2010.

    So here’s a local council (Labour run to nobody’s surprise) that believes in the current financial climate, it’s perfectly Ok to still be inventing new jobs to add to the public sector wager bill.

    The advert claims that the current set-up is successful and well established, so why the need for another manager? No doubt there are meetings to attend, mission statements to be composed, appraisals to be performed, boxes to be ticked, reports to be written and targets to be measured.

    But what it boils down to is £54k per annum for a truant officer.

    AP

Viewing 17 posts - 86 through 102 (of 136 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.