The home of intelligent horse racing discussion
The home of intelligent horse racing discussion

2.15 Catterick – Are the Stewards Blind?

Home Forums Horse Racing 2.15 Catterick – Are the Stewards Blind?

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #6482
    underscore
    Member
    • Total Posts 537

    Can someone explain to me what a horse/jockey has to do to be disqualified. Obv talking with my pocket…but Flake was almost bundled off the track by Primus….and there must be no doubt that Flake would have won but for the "body slam". :roll:

    #139479
    highflyer1
    Participant
    • Total Posts 221

    And of course if you had backed the winner, you would be praising the Stewards for their wisdom.

    In fact there was a considerable element of doubt as to whether the runner-up would have won, therefore the Steward’s decision is the correct one.

    #139480
    Avatar photoyeats
    Participant
    • Total Posts 3691

    Thought it was the correct decision, the winner was going away again at the post. Too much doubt to disqualify.

    #139490
    Avatar photoCharlie D
    Member
    • Total Posts 500

    In fact there was a considerable element of doubt as to whether the runner-up would have won, therefore the Steward’s decision is the correct one.

    No consolation to Flake backers, but I’d thought it was a hard one to call and the doubt over whether Flake would have won on or not probably meant the stewards couldn’t demote the first past the post

    #139651
    underscore
    Member
    • Total Posts 537

    I’m going to assume you guys are drunk. Do you not think that getting shunted into the railing is going to affect the finish??

    #139655
    Avatar photoCharlie D
    Member
    • Total Posts 500

    I’m going to assume you guys are drunk.

    You start a thread, people reply and give their thoughts, but because you don’t like what they post, you post the carp above

    Amazing attitude underscore imo

    #139661
    MikkyMo73
    Member
    • Total Posts 1789

    Where’s the fish, where’s the fish?

    I don’t see any fish above Charlie :lol:

    Mike

    #139665
    Avatar photoCharlie D
    Member
    • Total Posts 500

    Marb

    Anyone who treats another persons opinion as worthless (and that is what the drunk statement implies imo) will get no credit from me, i’m afraid

    #139687
    underscore
    Member
    • Total Posts 537

    Wind yer neck in Charlie. It was an obv comment in jest…. I’m sure you weren’t drunk… maybe its a new pair of specs you need. :)

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.