The home of intelligent horse racing discussion
The home of intelligent horse racing discussion

sacha

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 17 posts - 35 through 51 (of 53 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Sacha’s system #43876
    sacha
    Member
    • Total Posts 55

    Have to post saturdays now<br>Cheltenham 12.50 – Red Blazer 2nd ew6/1<br>2.30 Fonmort yipee 5/1<br>Doncaster 1.00 Meadows Boy non runner<br>1.35 Samuel WilderspinLost<br>2.45 Hurricane LampLost (2nd)<br>3.20 Full IrishLost (2nd)<br>Fakenham 12.35 Runaway BishopLost<br>1.10 Diamonds will doonly 3rd<br>Haydock 12.10 Nowell House (although carrying a lot less weight poss ew Sahhar and Marsh Marigold)EW lost (as did the other two)<br>1.20 – Monarch’s Pursuit Lost(Clan Royal less weight ew)he was only 5th<br>1.50 October Mist only 4th ew(carrying less weight theory Ballylusky)was 2nd in the end

    Don’t know forecast yet so 1 pt unless 6/1 or more in which case ew

    Not great!<br>opening bank 10 pts <br>total bets 70 pts <br>total winnings 86.50 <br>bank as at 14/12 26.5 points<br>

    (Edited by sacha at 10:57 am on Dec. 20, 2002)

    in reply to: point to pointing #101819
    sacha
    Member
    • Total Posts 55

    Hackwood Park :cool: – we go there – might see you there Ian

    If there a few of us going to a p2p this season maybe we could have a TRF meet up?

    Wow thanks Robert – someone who actually saw the big lump in action. I don’t know whether i will run her this season (2003) as she was such a mess when I bought her. She’d been at a ‘proper’ trainers yard for a few months and was so mentally messed up and very underweight. It will be a while before i can even hunt her so i might try and event her this spring and if I keep her aim for the 2004 season. She will be a lot stronger by then and will be beautifully schooled of course;) <br>And I’ll try and get hold of those back issues too Adrian.

    in reply to: Sacha’s system #43874
    sacha
    Member
    • Total Posts 55

    Cheltenham 1.10 – Darapour 1pt – Lost <br>1.45 – Storm Damage – 1pt ew  3rd at 6/1 <br>2.20 – Spectrometer – 1pt – 1st yipee 4/1<br>2.55 – Horus – 1pt 1st 5/2<br>3.25 – no selection

    Doncaster 2.30 – Friedhelmo – 1ptLost

    I ahve a theory that if there is more than one selection and there is a significant difference in weight carried between the two ( 10 pounds +), then the next selection down that is carrying at least 10 pounds less should also be considered?? Does any of that make sense?:o

    eg at Cheltenham today<br>1.10 Darapour is carrying 11-2. Both Uncle Mick and Live the Dream meet the other criteria, but Uncle Mick carries 10 pounds less, live the dream carries 12 pounds less.<br>So a trial selection of 1pt ew on Uncle Mick Lost

    In the 1.45 only 9 pounds between spectrometer and the quads And the Quads won @ 6/1- so maybe 10 pouns difference is too much

    2.20 – Telimar Prince has ? on going and only 3 pounds less than spectrometer. but he managed 2nd at 7/1 But Zamat is 1 stone 4 less so trial selection of 1pt ew.<br>(Scullys Hope 4th @ 12/1 & Coultard carry even less weight)

    2.55 – Horus is 11-4, quite a few fit the criteria but Kit Smartie is 9 pounds less. However he has a ? on going so 1pt ew may prove to be a bit risky 4th @ 16/1but not enough runners, the others that fitted the criteria were Ballinclay King  3rd at 16/1 and Bramblehill Duke 2nd at 16/1

    At Doncaster Lauderdale is only 8 pounds lighter than Friedhelmo. and he was 2nd at 10/1<br>I won’t include these trial selections in the running total today but it will interesting to see if any of these longer odds run into a place.<br>I think using the topweight of all my selections is not the best  as proved by some of the ‘other’ ones today – will think of this over the weekend.

    opening bank 10 pts <br>total bets 57 pts <br>total winnings 81.00 <br>bank as at 13/12 34 points

    (Edited by sacha at 3:39 pm on Dec. 13, 2002)

    in reply to: point to pointing #101808
    sacha
    Member
    • Total Posts 55

    Thanks Sal!

    I own her now and knew she hadn’t been terriebly succesful! She seems to have a lot of issues (although getting better all the time) and it would have been interesting if m&S had made any comments on her temperament at the time! Her previous owners did try again with her before F&M outbreak in 2001 but I think the jockey fell off :biggrin:  so they gave up after that.

    Any ideas as to where to buy back issues of M&S as they will prove very useful next time I go to the sales to bag a ‘bargin’;)

    in reply to: Sacha’s system #43873
    sacha
    Member
    • Total Posts 55

    Thanks Kersley – as I am actually going to start keeping some data today that might be a good indicator!!

    in reply to: point to pointing #101799
    sacha
    Member
    • Total Posts 55

    I don’t suppose anybody has a copy of the p2p form guide (mackensie & selby I think) from the 2000 season. I am just trying to find out if there was any comments made on a mare called Foxwood Polo who raced a couple of times that season – I know she ran at Dalston and Whittingham (both in the North West I think) taht season.<br>Thanks

    in reply to: Sacha’s system #43871
    sacha
    Member
    • Total Posts 55

    Thanks for the tips Davejay. Stupiedly I haven’t been keeping track of other info – so will start today!<br>Todays selections<br>Huntingdon 12.45 – Bay Island 1pt – lost (only 3rd)<br>1.50 – no selection<br>2.50 – Nick the Jewel – 1pt – 1st 8/11

    Ludlow 1.10 – no selection<br>1.40 – Lanmire Tower 1 pt (was only 4th but was 8-1)<br>2.10 – Reverse Swing (going a ?) – 1pt – lost<br>(I am not including the amateur riders as I don’t class that as a proper race!)

    Taunton 2.00 – no selection<br>2.30 – Needwood Lion 1pt – 2nd<br>3.05 – no selection

    Nearly forgot to add the banks position<br>opening bank 10 pts <br>total bets 51 pts <br>total winnings 70.00 <br>bank as at 11/12 29<br>(Edited by sacha at 4:56 pm on Dec. 12, 2002)<br>

    (Edited by sacha at 8:52 am on Dec. 13, 2002)

    in reply to: Sacha’s system #43869
    sacha
    Member
    • Total Posts 55

    typical – just as all 3 were absolute certainties – it’s cancelled :biggrin: <br>No past results I’m afraid Mr E – although I once tried this same system (ascending form) on a day’s racing in France and picked all 6 winners on the card  – that’s why I thought I’d try it for real. (Well pretend real)<br>I will hone it down to include some other factors but will wait for a bit more data first.<br>Never mind – there’s always tomorrow

    in reply to: Sacha’s system #43867
    sacha
    Member
    • Total Posts 55

    :biggrin: :biggrin: <br>i’m not sure what bromide is supposed to do – or shouldn’t I ask?

    Ok – <br>Leicester 2.35 – Navarone – 1pt ew<br>3.05 – still giving ? on going a chance – Doigts D’Or – 1pt ew (if river styx wins I know the ? is a bad idea)<br>3.35 – Time n Tide – 1 pt <br>

    in reply to: Sacha’s system #43865
    sacha
    Member
    • Total Posts 55

    Thanks Mr E – I will continue!!<br>Ok today’s soddy selection<br>Fontwell 12.45 – no selection<br>1.15 – Tullons Lane 1pt ew (he has a ? against the going so will decide after today if a ? is as bad as a X) – lost<br>3.15 – Trumper 1pt ew – lost<br>3.45 – Mithak – 1pt – lost

    Sedgefield 1.55 – Maraud 1pt – lost (4th)<br>2.55 – Mighty Fine 1pt – lost<br>3.25 – Tarashani 1pt – lost (4th)

    No winners<br>opening bank 10 pts <br>total bets 46 pts <br>total winnings 68.33 <br>bank as at 10/12 32.33

    Still in profit but I’m eating into it!!

    (Edited by sacha at 4:15 pm on Dec. 10, 2002)

    in reply to: Sacha’s system #43863
    sacha
    Member
    • Total Posts 55

    Lets hope this weekend was just a bad day!

    Ayr 1.15 – Yankee Jamie 1pt – 1st 10/3<br>1.45 – Kung hei fat choi – 1 pt ew – lost<br>2.15 – Lord of the loch – 1 pt ew – lost

    opening bank 10 pts<br>total bets 38 pts<br>total winnings 68.33<br>bank as at 9/12 40.33<br>

    (Edited by sacha at 4:35 pm on Dec. 9, 2002)

    in reply to: Sacha’s system #43862
    sacha
    Member
    • Total Posts 55

    I’ll have to do tomorrows selections without knowing the forecast prices or RP opinion on whether they go on the ground or not, but still 1pt to win unless greater than 6/1 forecast in which case 1pt ew.<br>This could really test the bank as there are so many selections! Lets hope I make a least a little profit ;) <br>Warwick<br>12.25 – Mashhoor – Lost 1pt ew<br>2.00 – Duchamp – Lost 1pt<br>3.10 – Zaggy Lane – Lost 1 pt ew<br>Chepstow<br>1.20 – Master of Illusion – lost 1pt<br>1.50 – Beauchene-lost 1pt<br>2.20 – no selection<br>Sandown<br>12.50 – Dunston Bill-lost 1pt<br>1.25 – Chief Cashier-lost 1pt<br>3.05 – Mr Cool-lost 1pt<br>3.40- Majestic Bay-3rd 8/1 1 pt ew

    Oh dear – not very succesful.

    opening bank 10 pts<br>total bets 33 pts<br>winnings 64pts<br>total bank as at 7/12 41 pts<br>

    (Edited by sacha at 8:53 am on Dec. 9, 2002)

    in reply to: Sacha’s system #43861
    sacha
    Member
    • Total Posts 55

    Ok – now to prove how much of a fluke yesterday was :biggrin:

    Exeter 1.00  -Madam Mosso 1pt ew – 1st 8-1 (great start)<br>2.05 Lancatrian Jet – 1pt – Lost (2nd)<br>2.40-  no selection<br>3.10 – would have been tacita but non runner

    sandown 12.45 – canon mccarthy – 1pt  -lost<br>2.25 – cimarron cove – 1 pt ew – 2nd 4/1 (shortened a lot from forecast)

    total pts bet 6pts<br>total winnings – 14pts<br>profit friday 8pts

    total after 3 days<br>opening bank 10pts<br>bet 21 pts<br>winnings 61 pts<br>bank balance at end day 3 – 50 pts<br>

    (Edited by sacha at 3:50 pm on Dec. 6, 2002)

    in reply to: Sacha’s system #43847
    sacha
    Member
    • Total Posts 55

    If anybody notices any flaws in my calculation please say – I have assumed 1/4 of the odds for ew – does that seem fair?<br>well the first two days have been fun, but if i’d put real money on they would have fallen at the first!!

    in reply to: Sacha’s system #43843
    sacha
    Member
    • Total Posts 55

    :biggrin: <br>Ok so todays selections will be:<br>Leicester 1.30 – no selection<br>3.05 – Praire Minstrel – 1 pt – 1st 5/1<br>3.35 – Croker – 1 pt ew – 1st 16/1 (:cool: )

    Market Rasen 1.10- Red Emperor – 1 pt – Lost<br>2.10 El Cordobes – 1pt – 1st 11/4

    Wincanton 1.30 – no selection<br>2.25 – Dear Deal (I count slipped up as the same as BD) – 1 pt ew 2nd 8/1<br>2.55 Hear comes henry – 1 pt – lost<br>3.25 – madam Flora – 1 pt ew 3rd 16/1

    Total points bet 10pts<br>Total points won 39.75<br>Profit 29.75

    after two days  – opening bank 10 points<br>bet 15 pts<br>winnings 47pts<br>bank total end day 2 = 42 points

    wow not a bad start – why didn’t I have some real money on :cheesy:

    <br>(Edited by sacha at 2:42 pm on Dec. 5, 2002)<br>

    (Edited by sacha at 5:03 pm on Dec. 5, 2002)

    in reply to: betting exchange theory #43452
    sacha
    Member
    • Total Posts 55

    Really sorry – but could someone explain the overround principle. (ignoramus here)

    in reply to: Cross Country Chase #101681
    sacha
    Member
    • Total Posts 55

    I though it was a great race to watch and well done to Cheltenham for an interesting and chaellenging course. I think the different obstacles encourage the horses to jump well and fail to see what is cruel about it?? Unless you think all NH racing is cruel?<br>A good jockey who has natural balance and a eye for a stride is a god send and the horses that had been schooled properly (as all chasers should) jumped well. When i finally achieve my ambition of becoming an owner I would love to have a horse run in such a race.

Viewing 17 posts - 35 through 51 (of 53 total)