The home of intelligent horse racing discussion
The home of intelligent horse racing discussion

Racing insider

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 17 posts - 1 through 17 (of 19 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Dean McKeown – new career already! #191720
    Racing insider
    Member
    • Total Posts 20

    Lol tell me this is a joke right ?

    Jesus he got some front him

    in reply to: R.I Monday 24th nov, racing preview #191716
    Racing insider
    Member
    • Total Posts 20

    No, as if you read my posts the short price ones should win, but only a mug would be backing em in this testing ground. I avoid all horses below 2/1. No value in em.

    Would have a small e/way on downs folly though, long as not a big drifter, it will run solid race and daly yard in cracking form. Maybe today is day.

    in reply to: R.I Monday 24th nov, racing preview #191712
    Racing insider
    Member
    • Total Posts 20

    Lol Barrys post was in his usual cheerful mood. Barry please stop shouting on tv also. Makes you look like your nuts.

    in reply to: usa vs uk #191698
    Racing insider
    Member
    • Total Posts 20

    Your talking about the casual owners and syndicate owners. The biggest owners in racing love a punt, and they have more money thaan sense. Horse racing has and will always be associated for with money/gambling. Without gambling the sport finishes. Because i certainly would not watch a class 6 seller at wolverhampton on saturday evening for the fun of it!

    in reply to: Harry pays £714,000 to betfair this year #191694
    Racing insider
    Member
    • Total Posts 20

    deleted

    in reply to: R.I Monday 24th nov, racing preview #191688
    Racing insider
    Member
    • Total Posts 20

    Thank you Andy. Will be noted for future.

    in reply to: R.I Monday 24th nov, racing preview #191683
    Racing insider
    Member
    • Total Posts 20

    By the way, were is "tips section" ?

    in reply to: R.I Monday 24th nov, racing preview #191681
    Racing insider
    Member
    • Total Posts 20

    No worrys Barry Dennis, and thanks for welcome.

    in reply to: usa vs uk #191679
    Racing insider
    Member
    • Total Posts 20

    Thats load of bull from my point of view. Easy to run a horse on wrong ground,class,distance and track etc…. Lets not forget running them when not fully fit, or running them after overworking em on gallops etc… Majority of people n racing, are in it to make money, so you have got to expect them to try and land a punt every so often. I have no problem with it, and is what makes our sport great.

    Certainly know when im a owner, it will be all about landing a few punts and enjoying the sport. Not trying to win a 3k race.

    in reply to: usa vs uk #191671
    Racing insider
    Member
    • Total Posts 20

    Corruption in racing is deep and wide spread. If your definition of corruption, is a horse either being pulled or lined up for a plot so connections can land a punt, then i would say 70% involved in racing are upto this.

    If your saying corruption is a owner/trainer/jockey betting on a horse to lose or getting that horse beat, then i would say no more than 2% in racing are upto this.

    Day in day out, im told of horses not fancied and that will not be winning today, nothing funny from jockey or trainer. Just that they know it will not be winning. I see nothing wrong in this aslong as horse trying and put into the race.

    Again several times a week im told of connections having a punt with their horse, some win, some lose….. again nothing wrong with that imo.

    I have guys well connected with most of yards in flat and jumping racing. Only once was i told of a trainer that fittef into the 2% group above, that trainer is very well known national hunt trainer, and people would not be suprised if i named him(of course i won’t).

    But jist of this was, Trainer A jockey A were betting on Horse B, Trainer of horse B was also bet on by trainer B. As Trainer A’s horse was only danger, It was baiscally free money for them all, and a touch was landed at 6/4-2/1. Now jockey of horse A was criticised for not putting the horse in the race that day.

    Thats only time i have been aware of anything dodgy really going on, i have no problem with owners or trainers getting a horse lined up for plot.

    in reply to: Matt Chapman #191669
    Racing insider
    Member
    • Total Posts 20

    You can show your dislike to a presenter without having to use swear words can’t you ?

    deleted

    in reply to: Matt Chapman #191559
    Racing insider
    Member
    • Total Posts 20

    Lol, well as i say, my results will do the talking. Till then, nothing more i can say. Time for my roast dinner.

    Adiós todo para ahora, y yo los agarraré en futuro, quizá mañana. :)

    in reply to: Matt Chapman #191555
    Racing insider
    Member
    • Total Posts 20

    Well i have my nose in a few pies so to speak. Which i will prove in future, when i share what im betting on. But till then, as my name says im a "insider".

    in reply to: Matt Chapman #191553
    Racing insider
    Member
    • Total Posts 20

    Well all depends on what you would call a real "Racing insider" i guess….. but answer your question, then yes in a sense.

    in reply to: Matt Chapman #191546
    Racing insider
    Member
    • Total Posts 20

    Are you real David Johnson ?

    I mean if you are not, then why post under his name. If you are then i understand.

    Freedom of speech is not there to be abused, and several on here have done that. What has Clare Balding sexuality got to do with her job ?

    Is that what freedom of speech is for ?

    in reply to: Matt Chapman #191543
    Racing insider
    Member
    • Total Posts 20

    Some of comments on here are truly pathetic. So much for tough forum rules, i read this forum was very strict and only for real racing fans.

    Yet first replys you see are some vile chav calling a guy he never met or even know a "tw*t". Wow aint you the clever one………

    On Matt Chapman himself, i like the guy alot, has alot of passion for sport, and the only guy who can make a saturday evening A/W card look exciting.

    How ATR can suspend someone like him, when they have dale mckeown on is laughable.

    Probably best for Matt and CH4 racing if he is sacked and Is signed upto front the morning line and Racing on CH4.

    in reply to: Classic Champion Hurdle 2009 #191542
    Racing insider
    Member
    • Total Posts 20

    I have been strong supported and backer of Binocular since day one, and my opinion has not changed. I rate Binocular as banker bet of meeting, and come march, you will be lucky to get 5/2 never mind 4/1.

Viewing 17 posts - 1 through 17 (of 19 total)