Forum Replies Created
- Posts
Having had to delete a number of ‘Harry Findlay’ threads and posts on here I have every sympathy with betfair on that particular issue.
Why?
People who defend people who they are employed by freelance or PAYE must always be viewed with suspicion. Rory sounds like a "sauce" to me
3 F out Queally was quite happy to sit well back. I think he they must have had total confidence in him yesterday. The second must be at least 1 90+ horse and Frankel toyed with him.
Interesting stuff. By the sounds of it sponsoring a racehorse trainer is the alst thing that they will be concerned with
I have had confirmation that Harry F approached a couple of members of the RUK team who he asked to "have a word" with Mr Neesom, but he apologised for his rant shortly afterwards. More than that I do not know.
rory – You must know a bit morre by know. After all Betfair killed all the threads mentioning the Harry v Neesom bout. Are you sure that your not a messenger for Harry
come to tell us that he has aoplogised for haranguing Neesom.Hanton was a classic was it not
Findlay assocites can be summed up by the fact that his go to jockey is Tony Culhane.
He’s a fascinating character as he’s been at a few crime scenes over the years. Harry puts him in the frame as his "In running man", "form man", and so on and on….
Then he operates an account on behalf of Harry. Is he a partner or an employee of Findlay? Has he ever laid Findlay horses or those from yards he is connected with?
Questions that need to be answered rapidememnt
That’s a few personal insults for simply pointing out that your sham defence of Betfair’s OTT censorship is bloody obvious. Baiscall the point of this thread is what a joke Steedman was trying to adhere to his BF instructions. All you have done is show that BF have all their employees well trained. You are dfending the indefensible which censorship always is. HTH
You could stage races with no advertised prize money
(outside stakes and course generated sponsorship)with the placed runners receiving a fixed percentage of what the on-course books, Tote, betting shops, bookmaker call centres, internet outlets, betting exchanges and offshore parasites generate for each race.
What would 1% of a Yarmouth 0-60 gnerate anyone care to guess?
That would be the 2% column in an ask the audience.
That is so clever I have not the faintest clue what you are saying. Maybe try again using different words
What an evasive answer. Do you actually invoice BF for doing a bit of freelance spinning. It is blindingly obvious that the BF Forum reflects what is the main point of this thread ie. Editorial Slant/Censorship on Timeform Radio. Why bother participating if you want to deny the bloody obvious! Bit daft
The dig at Dave Nevison was a very cheap shot. He basically derided Dave for working so hard. As far as I know Nevo has never been charged with any offence by the BHA, nor has there been any suspicions about him laying horses that he is connected with.
I think Dave will still be gracing the sport when Harry gets found out for what he does. Geln Gill and all!
Rory. Why can’t you even acknowledge a question on why BF censor all postings that are not prop Harry Findlay on their forum? Do you seriously expect us to believe that you have no knowledge of what BF’s inernal position is on Findlay "spin".
It’s really uncool to come on here and big up your employers. We are here to discuss stuff independently not SPAM for monetary gain
The more this unravels the more confusing it gets. For those of us that can remember Robert Maxwell was also very aggresive when people tried to delve into his dealings.
Thanks for unmasking yourself. Would you like to comment on this piece from the Gauardian concerning the Sunday Forum. Betfair deleting all Findlay threads and now this. WTF is going on? It’s a sport not a war!
11.50pm Findlay’s firecrackers fizzle out as At The Races cut programme short
Tony Paley:
The long-awaited appearance of outspoken gambler and owner Harry Findlay on racing channel At The Races this morning
ended rather abruptly after nearly 40 minutes of a scheduled hour-long programme.
Findlay, who was joined by the Times’ racing correspondent Alan Lee on the weekly Sunday Forum, talked extensively about the future of the Tote and the Levy system for funding British racing which he argued was now well past its sell-by date.
Following the dispersal of the horses he owned with Paul Barber at the Doncaster Sales earlier this week he reiterated that he would have no horses in training in joint ownership with his mother in their colours while the present leadership is in power at the British Horseracing Authority.
"When the right people are running the sport the purple and grey [colours] will be back," said Findlay, who was clearly still smarting at the recent BHA ban for laying horses in his ownership, a decision which was reversed on appeal.
"My wife will never set foot on a British racecourse again," added Findlay, who also confirmed he plans to spend more time in Australia than Britain in future. He has regularly spent three months of the year in Australia in recent years but said that is likely to be increased to nine.
"I’ve been trying to get to Australia [more permanently] for a few years and have already got a couple of horses there. This is a commercial as well as lifestyle decision," said Findlay.
He ended the shortened programme by tipping up his horse, Escholido, in the opening race at Windsor tomorrow night but left viewers wondering what might have ended up on the cutting room floor such was the truncated nature of the show.
come to tell us that he has aoplogised for haranguing Neesom.
