[arazi91]

Tetleys

Try here http://www.directoryoftheturf.com/search_results.cfm/searchcategory/Racehorse%20Trainers/searchcountry/UK

You still have to click on a trainer individually , but at least they are all in the one place and most have date of births and marriage status etc.

[arazi91]

The Big Grade 3 Handicaps have held up quite well

All Grade 3 Races NH – UK Since 2003

2017 18.47
2016 18.08
2015 18.77
2014 18.33
2013 18.94
2012 17.94
2011 18.52
2010 19.84
2009 19.04
2008 17.88
2007 17.96
2006 18.78
2005 19.25
2004 17.38
2003 19.13

[arazi91]

All Grade 1 NH Races – UK Since 2007

2017 9.44
2016 9.12
2015 9.45
2014 9.84
2013 8.69
2012 9.76
2011 10.00
2010 10.85
2009 11.97
2008 10.77
2007 11.15

[arazi91]

link here

https://www.thoroughbredracing.com/articles/field-sizes-how-us-trailing-most-nations-top-level/

[arazi91]

Different playing field , but James Willoughby with some Field size data on Worldwide Flat Group/Grade Racing

[arazi91]

All Hurdle Races UK – Since 2007

2007 11.51
2008 11.68
2009 10.94
2010 10.57
2011 9.96
2012 9.76
2013 9.75
2014 8.86
2015 8.91
2016 9.08
2017 8.71

All Chase Races UK – Since 2007

2007 8.74
2008 9.08
2009 8.66
2010 8.00
2011 7.37
2012 7.59
2013 7.60
2014 7.15
2015 7.42
2016 7.62
2017 7.32

[arazi91]

thewexfordman

Southwell since 2003

2017 7.95
2016 8.06
2015 8.18
2014 7.89
2013 8.23
2012 9.11
2011 8.32
2010 9.45
2009 10.48
2008 10.40
2007 9.81
2006 10.83
2005 11.23
2004 9.50
2003 8.00

[arazi91]

Bangor since 2003

2017 8.03
2016 7.85
2015 8.04
2014 6.48
2013 7.38
2012 8.16
2011 7.83
2010 8.66
2009 9.58
2008 10.22
2007 10.37
2006 9.59
2005 9.80
2004 9.59
2003 9.49

Kempton since 2003

2017 8.08
2016 8.88
2015 8.29
2014 9.28
2013 9.22
2012 9.51
2011 8.70
2010 9.76
2009 9.37
2008 10.12
2007 9.06
2006 8.97
2005 10.14
2004 10.49
2003 9.48

[arazi91]

Fakenham since 2003

2017 6.30
2016 6.80
2015 6.47
2014 6.65
2013 6.62
2012 7.60
2011 7.03
2010 7.35
2009 8.23
2008 8.84
2007 8.59
2006 8.76
2005 9.14
2004 8.55
2003 8.10

[arazi91]

Ludlow since 2003

2017 8.09
2016 8.74
2015 8.68
2014 8.65
2013 9.30
2012 9.34
2011 8.69
2010 9.52
2009 10.24
2008 11.52
2007 11.05
2006 11.06
2005 10.98
2004 10.41
2003 9.30

[arazi91]

First column is from Jan 1 2014 up to 14/11/2017
Second column is from Oct 2016 up to 14/11/2017

[arazi91]

Dont know how this will format but some data

From 2014 + Season 2016/17 – Current(14/11/17)
AVG FS AVG FS
Aintree 11.34 Aintree 10.53
Ascot 8.76 Ascot 9.09
Ayr 8.05 Ayr 8.39
Bangor 7.62 Bangor 8.16
Carlisle 7.91 Carlisle 8.26
Cartmel 8.30 Cartmel 8.30
Catterick 8.02 Catterick 8.09
Cheltenham 12.14 Cheltenham 11.66
Chepstow 9.49 Chepstow 10.05
Doncaster 8.69 Doncaster 7.96
Exeter 8.97 Exeter 9.10
Fakenham 6.56 Fakenham 6.51
Ffos Las 7.41 Ffos Las 7.87
Fontwell 7.37 Fontwell 7.29
Haydock 8.44 Haydock 8.78
Hereford 8.82 Hereford 8.82
Hexham 8.44 Hexham 8.67
Huntingdon 7.85 Huntingdon 8.18
Kelso 8.37 Kelso 8.29
Kempton 8.66 Kempton 7.88
Leicester 7.43 Leicester 7.46
Lingfield 7.43 Lingfield 8.35
Ludlow 8.53 Ludlow 8.11
Market Rasen 7.52 Market Rasen 7.51
Musselburgh 8.25 Musselburgh 8.18
Newbury 8.97 Newbury 9.18
Newcastle 7.95 Newcastle 8.00
Newton Abbot 8.09 Newton Abbot 8.10
Perth 7.51 Perth 7.67
Plumpton 7.55 Plumpton 7.41
Sandown 8.40 Sandown 8.25
Sedgefield 7.43 Sedgefield 7.67
Southwell 8.02 Southwell 8.06
Stratford 8.48 Stratford 8.19
Taunton 8.97 Taunton 9.06
Towcester 8.21 Towcester 7.69
Uttoxeter 8.84 Uttoxeter 9.33
Warwick 8.65 Warwick 8.77
Wetherby 8.39 Wetherby 8.64
Wincanton 8.22 Wincanton 7.93
Worcester 8.49 Worcester 8.53

[arazi91]

robnorth wrote:

THis question has been asked here in previous years. I suspect a good proportion of the trainers who run horses at this meeting will tell you it’s because the ground is good or near to good. It gives a chance of a decent competitive run on the free draining links soil at Musselburgh. I moved up to Scotland in 2006 and can’t remember a Musselburgh meeting run on anything worse than soft in that time.

Last year’s 8 race single day meeting yielded at least one Cheltenham runner from each race and, by means of quick check, 15 Cheltenham runners in all including:

Fagan 2nd in Albert Bartlett
Sky Khan 3rd in Martin Pipe Hurdle
Tagliatelle 4th in Pertemps Final
Full Shift 4th in 2m 4f Plate
Charbel 5th in Supreme Novice

From memory the 2015 meeting gave a similar return.

I’m pretty sure that the ‘go ahead’ Bill Farnsworth would have no trouble justifying his marketing of this meeting. Anyway if you took your line to its logical conclusion you would only hold Cheltenham trials at Cheltenham…

Everything else aside this meeting has now become one of the best meetings of the season in Scotland.

Rob

From a Scotsman , really great answer Rob or should that be “Rab” now

[arazi91]

Fordey33 – PM me – i have the very thing you are looking for.

[arazi91]

I would forget the variance in trainer data and start looking at the actual “universe” of horses and “surroundings”

Zarkava wrote:

What if that same horse was coming out of a handicap?

This clue was very relevant.

[arazi91]

Blade I admire the optimism but maybe try adding a little twist to the criteria. There are certain roads you can go down with a subset of one factor.

[arazi91]

Blade

Just checked there mate

All Racecodes Uk & Ireland 2003-2017

Criteria – sole CD winner

Runners – 32987
Wins – 5421
SR – 16.43%
ROI SP – -18.39%
On Betfair since 2009 – -7.2%

[Author]

Posts