December 17, 2006 at 22:42 #33812quixallcrossettParticipant
- Total Posts 358
Chester – 32 deg heat, squashed like sardines and the announcement "gentlemen may loosen their ties!!!"<br>Furthermore they’re trying to Chesterify my beloved Bangor being as we are now Siamese twins joined at the wallet!December 17, 2006 at 22:53 #33813Happy JackParticipant
- Total Posts 515
Quote: from davidbrady on 9:43 pm on Dec. 17, 2006[br]Newbury a big money-spinner for you HJ?<br>
Personal grievancies David!December 17, 2006 at 22:57 #33814Grey DesireParticipant
- Total Posts 1897
Have to agree about Chester,too busy and full of ppl who have no interest whatsoever in the racing.<br>Most that go there just fancy a p**s
Would dread being at the new Ascot when it’s busy.
Still feel Southwell’s turf course (flat and NH) is well under used.December 18, 2006 at 00:05 #33815Maxilon 5Member
- Total Posts 2432
Drone, I’d love to cook the local dish but I’m allergic to fruit:biggrin:
And some of you would get rid of Nottingham? Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â Why?
Level as a freshly pressed CD, lush turf which is kind to the horses, very little bias in races over a mile plus, the paddock ten seconds away from the ring, loads of space to breathe and popular with good horses from Newmarket. Plus relatively easy to predict results. I’m shocked!! Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â
What with Doncaster out for another year, I’d be bolloxed if some of you lot were in charge of the fixture list!:cheesy:
(Edited by Maxilon 5 at 12:06 am on Dec. 18, 2006)December 18, 2006 at 00:06 #33816PlatoParticipant
- Total Posts 12
Kempton Aw<br>Wolverhampton<br>Lingfield Aw
Uninteresting racing.Unattractive tracks.Off course bookies fodder racing.<br>Surface never runs two days alike.Everytime someone espouses a theory about these tracks the very next meeting the reverse occurs.Makes every serious punter I know look like a mug.December 18, 2006 at 01:33 #33817empty walletMember
- Total Posts 1631
Quote: from Plato on 12:06 am on Dec. 18, 2006[br]Kempton Aw<br>Wolverhampton<br>Lingfield Aw
Uninteresting racing.Unattractive tracks.Off course bookies fodder racing.<br>Surface never runs two days alike.Everytime someone espouses a theory about these tracks the very next meeting the reverse occurs.Makes every serious punter I know look like a mug.
PMSL, sorry Plato
this crap just cracks me up m8
(Edited by empty wallet at 1:39 am on Dec. 18, 2006)December 18, 2006 at 04:13 #33818indocineMember
- Total Posts 489
A bit of opportunism but I would ban the AW track at Musselburgh. The R&A seem not to give a monkeys about this proposed sacrilege which is shameful. The council don’t give a monkeys coz all they’re interested in is a new revenue. stream The existing track was built (mostly) around the golf course when heritage meant nothing which is understandable, but to butcher it once again for the sake of poor horses running on tyres under floodlights is crazy. I don’t even like golf but to start digging up greens at a place that is 400 years old, the oldest course in the world and where the first 4 open championships were played just seems entirely crass and vulgar beyond belief.<br>December 18, 2006 at 09:24 #33819DroneParticipant
- Total Posts 5357
Quote: from Maxilon 5 on 12:05 am on Dec. 18, 2006[br]
And some of you would get rid of Nottingham? Why?
Great shame they got rid of the NH course as it was a very fair track, akin to Worcester. Enjoyed my occasional visits though haven’t been back since.December 18, 2006 at 09:28 #33820SeagullMember
- Total Posts 1708
Nothing wrong with Brighton.<br>I would get rid of <br>kempton aw<br>windsor<br>folkestone flatDecember 18, 2006 at 11:35 #33821clivexMember
- Total Posts 3420
Always baffled by this hostility to Kempton…but the AW track maybe was a mistake and they should have concentrated on the much needed east london course instead. Having said that, Kempton’s flat programme was nothing special anyway (and has been transferred). But its a realxed course (except boxing day) with decent viewing
Flat Catterick. Not been there but looks a bit ragged and theres no shortage of courses around there. Epsom is somewhere i dislike too
Jumps Sedgefield was pretty horrible when i visited
If i could get rid of a festival, it would be royal ascot. Embarrassing waste of good racingDecember 18, 2006 at 13:20 #33822stevedvgMember
- Total Posts 1137
Talking of courses, when will Great Leighs open?
It’s 18th December and my 2006 (yes, 2006) Wm Hill diary has it marked on their map. However, no racing.
What’s going on?
Catterick….theres no shortage of courses around there
SteveDecember 18, 2006 at 13:32 #33823Shadow LeaderMember
- Total Posts 763
I’d be inclined to say
AW – Southwell<br>Flat – Southwell<br>NH – Southwell
Job done! :biggrin:December 18, 2006 at 13:33 #33824apracingParticipant
- Total Posts 3198
First meeting is now scheduled for Feb 22nd, using temporary stands in the centre of the track, with the main grandstand due to open in September.
They are currently paying Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â£15,000 per fixture for the meetings that are being transferred to other tracks, so they have a significant incentive to hit that target.
APDecember 18, 2006 at 13:40 #33825davidbradyMember
- Total Posts 3901
Quote: from apracing on 1:33 pm on Dec. 18, 2006[br]They are currently paying Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â£15,000 per fixture for the meetings that are being transferred to other tracks, so they have a significant incentive to hit that target.
Do you mean in terms of lost revenue or are they actually physically paying money to other tracks to take their fixtures. If it’s the 2nd one, then why? Surely the other AW tracks are more than happy to have increased fixtures and revenue themselves without fleecing an, as yet, unopened course as well.December 18, 2006 at 13:50 #33826stevedvgMember
- Total Posts 1137
with the main grandstand due to open in September.
According to my diary, the course was meant to be opened in early October 2006.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.