Do you want Constitution Hill to run in the Champion Hurdle?
- Yes
- No
- This topic has 27 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 2 months, 1 week ago by
.
- Posts
Not so much should he run but do you want him to run.
The more I know the less I understand.
You’ll get 80% no, including me. I’m without a bet in the CH so far and it could remain that way. It’s not my number one race at the Fez.
Only twelve votes at the moment but didn’t expect it to be so close.
The more I know the less I understand.
I think some of us have backed him at some stage and want him to run, Gladders obviously the exception.
HDLG is n/o to have voted NO, Mike is n/o for YES.No. Even if he manages to jump round safely, he doesn’t jump well enough to win a Champion Hurdle so what’s the point?
No, his participation would make the first day a bore with saturation coverage and post race gush if it turns out happily. Bitter recriminations if it doesn’t.
That’s the thing that would really grate with me if he won pilgarlic – the fawning over connections for taking such an irresponsible decision.
Yes,
Would love to see him win at the big stage again. Would be a bit like Sprinter Sacre winning his second Champion Chase.
As much as i would love to see him bolting up in the champion hurdle, its simply not worth the risk at this stage, the fighting fifth was his chance to prove he had shed any demons from 6 months prior.
No. He has jumped one and a half hurdles in public this season, 3 months ago. That’s not enough.
Also, this:
“his participation would make the first day a bore with saturation coverage”
They’d be wanging on all day about a horse who won the race 3 years ago and probably ignoring the reigning champion.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.