Home › Forums › Horse Racing › US raiders
- This topic has 32 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 19 years, 8 months ago by
GreenGreenDesert.
- AuthorPosts
- September 14, 2006 at 13:30 #3006
Reading up on Deep Impact’s Arc bid made me realise how few American raiders we have over here in Europe.<br>If a horse can be shipped all the way over from Japan or Australia for a sporting challenge of the best equines in each hemisphere, surely it would be just as feasible for the US raiders to come over here and take us on on our own ground? Do they not want to expose the form of their horses in races like the Arc? Could it be that a horse that could be the best is more financially lucrative than a horse that is exposed as second best maybe?
September 14, 2006 at 13:45 #77059The biggest factor is likely to be the surface they run on.
September 14, 2006 at 14:13 #77060The main reason is surely that they won’t be allowed to be doped up to the eyeballs over here.
September 14, 2006 at 14:25 #77061Don’t they use lasix in Japan? Maybe not, but I thought they did.
September 14, 2006 at 15:07 #77062Also their turf horses are pretty average compared to ours. Best dirt and sprinters in the world but on Turf our best turf horses are much superior.
September 14, 2006 at 18:12 #77063The current poor exchange rate is a factor too, as is traditional American insularity.
Many trainers don’t particularly like shipping to a neighbouring state, never mind over a huge expanse of briny.
My other half is American and generally, their lack of interest in the rest of the world continues to astonish. So don’t hold your breath, RD. :biggrin:
September 14, 2006 at 18:47 #77064Add to that the fact that most Americans, when asked to find Yugoslavia on a map in 1992 thought it was somewhere in Central Africa. If they can’t find a whole country how do we expect them to find their way to Berkshire?
September 14, 2006 at 21:46 #77065There are a number of reasons, many outlined above.
One of the main factors would be why?
Why take a horse 3000 miles+ East, to compete for what? Only the very top races carry attractive enough prizemoney to take a horse out of the programme of suitable races Stateside, for something that may be detrimental to the rest of its season.
I originally lived in the UK, so I still follow the racing, especially the bigger races, but if that link wasn’t there, why would I find much in the European calendar appealing. If I had a good horse here at Woodbine, I can win big pots of money staying at home winning nice races.
The same point of topic could apply to the UK trainers. On Sunday we have a $1million G1 mile race, Al Valorem and Vanderlin are probable runners, is that all you have? At the end of October we have a nice days racing with the $2million G1 Canadian, the $1million G1 E.P. Taylor Stakes and the $500,000 G2 6f Neartic, what’s the betting that we have no UK runners in the latter. Doesn’t David Barker etc have a sprinter or two that would have a good shot at the £141,500 first prize?
Regarding the doping up to the eyeballs, here we can only run on 5ml of Lasix, half that of the US and no bute. I think you’ll find that ‘medication’ is evident in racing your side, it’s just catching them and then, what are they going to do with them when they do?
<br>
September 14, 2006 at 21:58 #77066All this talk about flat horses!!! Do Jay Trump & Ben Nevis count as American raiders?
September 15, 2006 at 02:18 #77067Quote: from quixallcrossett on 10:58 pm on Sep. 14, 2006[br]All this talk about flat horses!!! Do Jay Trump & Ben Nevis count as American raiders?
If you want to go back more than a quarter of a century, yes they do ;)<br>I take the point on prize money, but from a breeding perspective it is very good to have European G1 form in the book. We go over for the Breeders every year, yet they rarely, if ever, come over here. I think of horses like Choisir, Takeaway Target, Cape of Good Hope etc and wonder why they can do it and not the Americans. They go to Dubai for the rich pickings, but not here. It seems quite shortsighted to see the game merely as a means of earning prize money. Does pride and ambition not enter the equasion?
September 15, 2006 at 10:14 #77068Some American connections do consider our races and occasionally (Hard Buck 2nd to Doyen and Mighty Beau 4th in King’s Stand) they try.
However as Griff says the problems are thus:
1. Lack of medication (and by that I mean that medication they are currently using would have to be clean out of their system to run here and I don’t just mean Lasix).
2. Our top class racing is on turf so this limits the pool of horses in America (most of whom are dirt specialists), especially as turf sprinting is virtually non existent due to the layout of their tracks.
3. They only race left handed so right handed tracks such as Longchamp and Ascot are also strange to them.
4. Most importantly their races are so valuable. As Griff says (thanks for the PR by the way!;) the Canadian International (Gr.1) is worth C$ 2 Million.
5. They are used to getting beaten by us on turf on their home ground so they wouldn’t be over keen to take us on here (particularly if the Japanese are also competing here) unless the owners are particularly sporting.
6. Most American racing is geared to the Breeders’ Cup. Therefore, unless the horses aren’t Breeders’ Cup eligible (like Hard Buck) they are most likely to avoid shipping overseas until after this. That is why you do get a few Americans in Japan and Hong Kong.
September 15, 2006 at 11:11 #77069Adrian, let’s not forget Fourstars Allstar, who won the Irish 2000 Gns.;) Good points though.
Griff, I partially agree with you about our horses travelling Stateside. But the likes of Jeremy Noseda and Andrew Balding are honourable exceptions. Even Stan Moore plans to run Satulagi in the Breeders Cup Juvenile, (entries permitting).
Can I ask a question? What do you think about the planned Maktoum expansion in the States?
I spoke to a fellow in Houston, at Sam Houston Raceway who insisted on describing the Dubaian royal family in an uncomplimentary manner, following a Sheikh Hamdan stakes success at Belmont. It would be fair to say he wasn’t all that keen. It reminded me of the Australian attitude a couple of years back to raids on the Melbourne Cup.
September 15, 2006 at 18:50 #77070Horses for courses….<br>Ascot….Triangle..R/H…Galloping<br>Epsom….Horseshoe…L/H…Stiff<br>Goodwood….Pear….R/H….Stiff<br>Sandown….Oval….R/H….Stiff Nuff Said?
September 15, 2006 at 21:18 #77071Maxilon,  they have put their hand in their pocket at Keeneland with some enthusiasm, so there seems to be some intent. My feeling is that us up here in the quieter North, don’t really have a problem with Dubai coming here with their good horses, but I’m not sure the same can be said for South of the border. We appreciate the likes of Sulamani coming here to compete, regardless of the ownership.
Reading on past US forums, they are very quick to find fault in Godolphin and how they condition horses for the Kentucky Derby for instance, but I think they will have to get used to an Arab presence in their big races. Much of it is narrowmindedness I suspect, rather than basic patriotism. To generalize, the US people don’t have a global attitude.
Personally, if it brings top class horses here for us to watch, then I’m all for it, but if they came and hoovered up every claiming race over $40,000 with their lesser lights, then my attitude would probably change.
Andrew Balding has done quite well over here stealing our dollars and now we have recently changed to Polytrack, I would expect a few more Euros to visit.
No problem with the PR Adrian………because it’s true!!
"Does pride and ambition not enter the equasion?"
I don’t think it does. The prestigious races here probably mean little to you, the same applies to US trainers regarding UK races and their ambition to win them. Pride and ambition doesn’t pay training bills.
<br>
September 15, 2006 at 22:23 #77072Cheers for the response, Griff. :biggrin:
September 16, 2006 at 02:04 #77073I fully agree with most of the reasons given about the different nature of racing. I also think that it is good that we have that  difference….The thought of half our tracks being standardised would horrify me. It is the mark of a good horse that can win at any track. The way to proceed is not obscene prize money, but travelling expenses in my opinion.; and incentive bonus prizes and a points system for versatile horses (especially horses that can win pr perform or even compete at different trips)
I am not however going to indulge in the accusation that most Americans are insular , from a racing nation that has no clue what is happening in many countries racing wise.
"Add to that the fact that most Americans, when asked to find Yugoslavia on a map in 1992 thought it was somewhere in Central Africa."
"My other half is American and generally, their lack of interest in the rest of the world continues to astonish. "
Our guest here form the USA had a fair knowledge if British jumps racing for example, and I am finding the same on myspace from US racing folk…. UK flat for that matter too.
How many people knew what the Omak sucicide race of Washinton state was , the fact that there was American jumps racing, or anything about racing in South America? We only know what we are fed on TV.  David Nicholsons death was reported in US newspapers….do we get anything when their trainers die?
So, a quick quiz to see how insular we are:
1. Who won the Italian Grand National last year?<br>2. What is significant about an  Ak Al teke and in what countries do they compete against throughbreds?<br>3. How many racecourses in Brittany?<br>4. Who is champion jumps jockey in Germany?<br>5. Who is champion jumps jockey in France come to that and how many times has he won the title?<br>6. Why do few British horses compete for Turkeys valuable flat races?<br>7. At what other courses do they stage racing on ice other than St. Moritz?<br>8. What is the name of the Uzbekistan trainer that had a runner in the British St.Leger a couple of years back and what did he do before taking up training?<br>9. Which country has more racecourses, India or Holland?<br>10. What is the name of the Hungarian horse that won the Epsom Derby?<br>11. Which Japanese jumps race did Cenkos compete in?<br>12. Which American jockey is of part Iroqouis Indian descent?
Now honestly see how many you can answer without looking up the answers on the net.
Score a point for each correct answer.
Score 10-12  You are a liar:biggrin:
Score 8 to 10::o <br>Congratulations! You are not only very aware of the world’s racing scene and are very interested in people of other cultures and nations particularly where racing is concerned, tou are also the ultimate anorak. You wouldn’t be a great deal of fun out of a night at the Chelrenham festival but a damn good pub quiz member.
Score 5-7 Well done. :cheesy: Certainly my apologies for implying that we are all insular. With people like you around, we have a chance of seeing that horse racing is much much more than just betting.
Score 3-4 ;) Again well done. If you have a horse you probably have a spirit of adventure and may even see the value of representing your nation abroad. If not you will certainly visit foreign nations for racing and have a really exciting time.
Score 1-2 :)  Even that isn’t bad…you are aware there is racing in other countries and have some knowledge.
Score 0 :angry: Don’t ever criticise Americans. That is pot kettle black.
September 16, 2006 at 02:57 #77074How many people, even racing scholors, would know the answers to many of those questions? <br>Silly post IMO<br>How about I ask you which horse finished 12th in the 1937 Epsom Derby? No cheating! You should know the answer immediately, to such a simple question. Right?<br>
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.