The home of intelligent horse racing discussion
The home of intelligent horse racing discussion

Stiffest Fences

Home Forums Horse Racing Stiffest Fences

Viewing 17 posts - 1 through 17 (of 29 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1541634
    Avatar photoCrepello1957
    Participant
    • Total Posts 784

    Which courses do members consider to be the stiffest in the UK and Irish Republic? How many still have water jumps?
    I have noticed that fallers are a rarity in modern jumping, we have plenty of fatalities but mainly between the jumps on the flat.

    #1541636
    greenasgrass
    Participant
    • Total Posts 7673

    I don’t know that they’re all that particularly big, but I’ve always thought that jumping that double at Galway in a big handicap field with some horses around you not jumping straight and the occasional loose horse zig zagging around must be pretty hair raising and is a good test of a horse’s athleticism and nerve.

    #1541638
    thewexfordman
    Participant
    • Total Posts 1200

    Was never at the course but from TV it looks like the fences at Warwick take a bit of jumping.

    #1541647
    Avatar photoEx RubyLight
    Participant
    • Total Posts 4240

    The portable catapult fences at Southwell, Worcester and Haydock look pretty bad. Also the ‘normal’ fences at Ludlow and Taunton leave some horses somersaulting. Warwick fences seem pretty high imo.

    The final fence at Leopardstown looks particularly tricky to me.

    #1541649
    FinalFurlong91
    Participant
    • Total Posts 6657

    The tracks I associate with needing a good jumper are Warwick and sandown

    Though that’s maybe because of the way the fences set up than them being stiff

    #1541650
    Avatar photoIanDavies
    Blocked
    • Total Posts 12998

    When I used to work for the Racing Specialist in the 1980s, I made a study of this, looking at average fallers to runners over fences in novice chases and non-novice chases.

    Back then, Cheltenham was fearsome, as was Wetherby, in fact after starting off somewhere like Market Rasen or Catterick, Peter Easterby would send his decent novice chase prospects to Wetherby to see if they were ready for Cheltenham.

    Haydock, with its big drop fences, was tough too.

    But it’s all change now and fences, like bookmakers who will lay winning bets to you without closing you down, are not what they once were.

    I am "The Horse Racing Punter" on Facebook
    https://mobile.twitter.com/Ian_Davies_
    https://www.facebook.com/ThePointtoPointNHandFlatracingpunter/
    It's the "Millwall FC" of Point broadcasts: "No One Likes Us - We Don't Care"

    #1541653
    Avatar photopatriot1
    Participant
    • Total Posts 961

    Cheltenham still seem to set the standard for jumps. The ultimate test.

    I remember there was a lot of controversy in the early 90s about how stiff the jumps at Wetherby were. They used to attract very small fields.

    On the opposite side You can practically run through the fences at Ludlow and Musselburgh. Doesn’t teach novices how to jump. And I hate the portable fences at Southwell, Worcester etc.

    #1541657
    Avatar photoCork All Star
    Participant
    • Total Posts 9052

    Wetherby and Haydock have both been ruined as jumps tracks, especially the latter. Fences are meant to be jumped over. I have seen horses at Haydock jump through them!

    #1541681
    Avatar photoIanDavies
    Blocked
    • Total Posts 12998

    Completely agree – the fences at Wetherby and Haydock used to be an awesome sight, they stood out from fences at other circuits.

    But those days are long gone.

    I am "The Horse Racing Punter" on Facebook
    https://mobile.twitter.com/Ian_Davies_
    https://www.facebook.com/ThePointtoPointNHandFlatracingpunter/
    It's the "Millwall FC" of Point broadcasts: "No One Likes Us - We Don't Care"

    #1541706
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Total Posts 2553

    Used to go to Wincanton a lot. back in the 90s mainly. The fences there were a real test but probably been modified since then? Not been there for some years.

    #1541741
    dawnrun_jade
    Participant
    • Total Posts 20

    Not too fond of those fences at Southwell and Taunton… they look pretty stiff and must be rough for the horse.

    Time flies like a banana, flies are like arrows...fruit?.. wait, no....

    #1541745
    apracing
    Participant
    • Total Posts 3777

    By some distance, I’d say the stiffest jumping test on offer nowadays, is the Mildmay Course at Aintree. One reason for that is the very limited amount of use it gets.

    Fences become easier to brush through the more times they are jumped, as each horse knocks the birch and softens it just a little more. It’s also why there are fences where it’s unwise for a jockey to go wide – the third last at Kmepton is a prime example. The section closest to the far rail gets hit much more often than the outside half of that fence. Just watch next time they race there, and note how many chasers make a mistake coming wide that knocks them out of contention.

    I don’t have any up to date stats, but I’d guess the Mildmay course has a higher proportion of fallers and/or race ending mistakes than anywhere else these days.

    #1541748
    Avatar photoIanDavies
    Blocked
    • Total Posts 12998

    I agree.

    Where once David Nicholson referred to them as “upturned dandy brushes” they now look to me too to be some of the stiffest around.

    A couple of professional punters recently suggested that, here in 2021, the Mildmay is actually a tougher jumping test than the Grand National course.

    I don’t know if that’s true, but how times change to even be having the conversation!

    I am "The Horse Racing Punter" on Facebook
    https://mobile.twitter.com/Ian_Davies_
    https://www.facebook.com/ThePointtoPointNHandFlatracingpunter/
    It's the "Millwall FC" of Point broadcasts: "No One Likes Us - We Don't Care"

    #1541760
    Avatar photoDrone
    Participant
    • Total Posts 6021

    The Mildmay course is also flat and tight/sharp; hence it favours the speedy, agile type rather than the more ponderous, careful type. This allied to the resilient fences does indeed make it a good test of jumping

    Mention was made of Peter Easterby sending his novices to Wetherby: similarly Gordon Richards was fond of sending his over the ‘big black drops’ at Haydock

    The schools of hard knocks

    #1541770
    Avatar photoCork All Star
    Participant
    • Total Posts 9052

    The old Wetherby with its big, daunting fences would never have considered staging Flat racing. I still cannot get used to it.

    I can remember when horses like One Man ran in the Rowland Meyrick and the Castleford Chase attracted top class two milers.

    At least in the last jumps season the track saw wins by First Flow and Chantry House, both subsequent Grade 1 winners. But Wetherby’s decline seems to have coincided with the general decline of NH racing in the north.

    #1541774
    Avatar photoThe Tatling Cheekily
    Blocked
    • Total Posts 2723

    The BHA couldn’t give a toss about northern racing full stop, apart from Lord Teddy’s York. Whilst Ascot gets Group race after Group race if a Coolmore or Maktoum horse farts in its general direction, Beverley was hit extremely hard by the Hilary Needler being stripped of its Listed status. Tossers.

    BUY THE SUN

    #1541780
    Avatar photoIanDavies
    Blocked
    • Total Posts 12998

    The Hilary Needler at Beverley is a fantastic race.

    I saw Devon Ditty win it in 1978 and, from memory, she went on to win: the Cherry Hinton, the Lowther, the Flying Childers and the Cheveley Park.

    And Attraction won it in 2003 – and then won her next five on the bounce: Queen Mary, Cherry Hinton, 1,000 Guineas, Irish 1,000 Guineas, Coronation.

    I am "The Horse Racing Punter" on Facebook
    https://mobile.twitter.com/Ian_Davies_
    https://www.facebook.com/ThePointtoPointNHandFlatracingpunter/
    It's the "Millwall FC" of Point broadcasts: "No One Likes Us - We Don't Care"

Viewing 17 posts - 1 through 17 (of 29 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.