- This topic has 21 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 8 months ago by
Meshaheer.
- AuthorPosts
- September 13, 2007 at 18:04 #5075
Just a thought
September 13, 2007 at 19:22 #114815I don’t see why you should have a forum of your own, Insomniac, gossip in the main section with the rest of us
September 13, 2007 at 19:37 #114818
September 13, 2007 at 20:38 #114830I’m sure it would break some sort of European directive.
September 13, 2007 at 20:55 #114833I think it might break a directive not too Dave. We may also need seperate sections for: Persons of Alternative Sexual Preference, Persons of Alternative Mobilty Status and Persons of Alternative Visual Distinction.
September 13, 2007 at 20:58 #114835So there you go Non .. even if we all want you to have one, insomniac.
September 13, 2007 at 21:36 #114844There could be too many grey areas – does one include or exclude those Forumites who are pre-op or post-op transsexuals? And what about those who are only ladies at weekends?
gc
Jeremy Grayson. Son of immigrant. Adoptive father of two. Metadata librarian. Freelance point-to-point / horse racing writer, analyst and commentator wonk. Loves music, buses, cats, the BBC Micro, ale. Advocate of CBT, PACE and therapeutic parenting. Aspergers.
September 13, 2007 at 22:29 #114848I’m sure there are a whole raft of laws laid out for ‘specials’ greys .. but your right it could be a problem.
September 13, 2007 at 22:30 #114849A grey areas Czar ?
September 13, 2007 at 23:30 #114858Persons of Alternative Sexual Preference, Persons of Alternative Mobilty Status and Persons of Alternative Visual Distinction.
I’ve just been reminded where I came across these expressions. They where from a paper submitted by a Trades’ Council to a RDA for future funding to an Equal Ops program. I couldn’t at the time and still can’t decide whether these terms are more inclusive or simply patronising. But then I don’t fall into any of the groups so I suppose it’s not for me say.
September 14, 2007 at 07:25 #114872I think in the bad old days they used to be called, puffs, spazzes and wierdos .. thanks God that’s all behind us.
September 14, 2007 at 07:38 #114874it is ?
September 14, 2007 at 08:04 #114884Will this be for only ladies to gossip or for anyone else to talk about ladies gossiping?
Will it allow in confused ladies?
September 14, 2007 at 09:46 #114896it is ?
.. that could be taken two ways Simon .. you either mean that we haven’t gone far enough with the lower classes, to move them out of their offensive purile behaviour which isn’t smart or funny. Or you think this dialogue still goes on in people’s minds, which is outrageous.
SO WHAT IS IT .. ARE YOU WITH US OR AGAINST US ??
September 14, 2007 at 09:57 #114901Will it allow in confused ladies?

…just about rules us out then KT..lol…what other place of refuge would put up with us?
September 14, 2007 at 20:50 #115022ooooh great idea! i love a good moan about men!
September 14, 2007 at 21:17 #115031How many men do you need to be about to achieve a good moan?
gc
Jeremy Grayson. Son of immigrant. Adoptive father of two. Metadata librarian. Freelance point-to-point / horse racing writer, analyst and commentator wonk. Loves music, buses, cats, the BBC Micro, ale. Advocate of CBT, PACE and therapeutic parenting. Aspergers.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.