Home › Forums › Horse Racing › Schooling in public
- This topic has 28 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 19 years, 6 months ago by
Nor1.
- AuthorPosts
- November 19, 2006 at 15:31 #462
Is it allowed now, please?
November 19, 2006 at 15:44 #31602Steve Mellish has just exposed this mob on RUK – stewards will have to act – no hiding place this time for Hooray Henry and Bradburne.
Let me guess, 2 weeks for the jockey, 40 days for the horse, 5 grand for the trainer, and sweet FA for the poor sods who backed it on the basis it may be trying to win!
November 19, 2006 at 15:45 #31603Only with people.
November 19, 2006 at 18:05 #31604When i see stuff like today at Aintree, I feel for genuine connections of horses that give their all when they run, run well, even get placed and then are put up another couple of pounds by handicapper for it
November 19, 2006 at 18:10 #31605And a big up to Steve Mellish too
shame those who write in industry paper don’t have gonads to do same
November 19, 2006 at 18:31 #31606The handicap system encourages cheating yet very little is done to prevent this. So what should be altered to encourage honest trainers/owners who want to run their horses on their true merit consistently? <br>
November 19, 2006 at 18:53 #31607what happened please?
November 19, 2006 at 18:59 #31608Watch 3.10 Aintree and draw yor own conclusion FSL
November 19, 2006 at 19:14 #31609Nor1
Handicap system does not encourage cheats
Thats like saying shops encourage shoplifters, homeowners encourage burglars etc
These people are breaking the rules of racing for reasons only known by them
(Edited by empty wallet at 7:16 pm on Nov. 19, 2006)
November 19, 2006 at 19:46 #31610I must say Henry Daly horses this term although very little evidence have been running awfully strange. <br>They seem to be hitting flat spots during the ‘run’ – <br>Rakalackey at Kempton<br>Briery Fox at Worcester <br>Vaughan at Sandown <br>Martha Kinsman also springs to mind.
Perhaps the interesting part would be how many of them have been prevented making any further progress due to errors. From 25 chase runners this term – a good number of failures to complete spring to mind Waterloo Son, Green Tango, Alderburn etc.
I won’t be amongst the order to be backing Down’s Folly at Ludlow tomorrow at 11/10 (!) BUT judged on today’s effort from OPERA DE COEUR getting a horse from A to B at whatever pace appeared to be the objective.
James.<br>
November 19, 2006 at 20:52 #31611Welcome to the forum James!
November 19, 2006 at 20:52 #31612Mr Bradburne got a seven day ban. Not enough IMO, but better than nothing.<br>As far as I saw, the horse was given little more than an exercise canter.
November 19, 2006 at 21:19 #31613Trainer was exonerated.<br>Even the stewards could see the obvious in Bradbourne’s ride- after all it was a 3 runner affair!
November 19, 2006 at 22:18 #31614Oh please – whilst not excusing the ride, there was no way in this world that Opera De Coeur would have beaten Lennon. No way at all.
November 19, 2006 at 22:19 #31615It reminded me of Hand Inn Hand’s first run in a chase – at Chepstow if I remember rightly – which I even posted up in what used to be called the "eyecatchers" section on here.
<br>To be fair though that time I think it was One Knight that went off like a nutter on Sunny D. Today both the other horses looked to have been on the red bull.
Lennon and Fair Along setting the pace in the Arkle. Nipper Reed will be cheering.
<br>
November 19, 2006 at 22:22 #31616….and Lennon winning the race I hope!! :biggrin:
November 20, 2006 at 09:44 #31617empty wallet<br>I do not understand your comparison with shops and homeowners because if the above left their goods on display, with little security, that would encourage the dishonest.<br>The handicap system is flawed by design and application
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.