The home of intelligent horse racing discussion
The home of intelligent horse racing discussion

Prix du Jockey Club 2018

Home Forums Big Races – Discussion Prix du Jockey Club 2018

Viewing 7 posts - 18 through 24 (of 24 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1356094
    Avatar photojackh1092
    Participant
    • Total Posts 3939

    I find the way the French races are run hard to judge form-wise.

    Study Of Man a better horse than the form probably shows him imo.

    Disappointed with Olmedo hopefully he can bounce back as i like him

    Twitter: Jackh1092
    Hindsight is 20/20 so make the most of it!

    #1363150
    Avatar photostevecaution
    Blocked
    • Total Posts 8241

    Study Of Man was out again yesterday and I was a bit surprised to see him odds-on given that he did not hold that much of an advantage on the bare figures.

    A preview I saw stated that Knight To Behold could be dangerous if allowed to dominate. I thought perhaps the French Jockey’s might be learning about letting the UK horses get an easy lead but no, they were as thick as usual.

    Knight To Behold made all and held on by 4 lengths, Study Of Man only started closing when it was clear that the leader was away and could not even get second place as he finished two lengths further adrift in 3rd spot.

    It was a disappointing effort from Study Of Man and the form looks mediocre.

    Thanks for the good crack. Time for me to move on. Be lucky.

    #1363216
    Avatar photoDegaussed
    Participant
    • Total Posts 568

    Knight to Behold put up a sectional performance on the clock of 126. Don’t make the mistake of under-estimating him.

    This was quite clearly a prep run for Study of Man. He shaped well enough, but I would wait until next time before you write off the form of an entire classic.

    #1363222
    Avatar photojackh1092
    Participant
    • Total Posts 3939

    Agree Degaussed, 73 day break, finishing 2Ls behind a horse he previously beat in G2 when previously he won G1….this is as clear a prep as you will see.

    The FR are notorious with their preps.

    I would be interested in him wherever he heads next time….has there been any signals? Priced of Irish champion stakes at 14s

    Twitter: Jackh1092
    Hindsight is 20/20 so make the most of it!

    #1363224
    Avatar photobotchy1
    Participant
    • Total Posts 6563

    I would be interested in him wherever he heads next time….has there been any signals? Priced of Irish champion stakes at 14s

    I think that was the plan Jack but sounds as if the plan has changed now.

    https://www.racingpost.com/news/international/knight-puts-in-a-performance-to-behold-under-murphy-at-deauville/342658

    #1363237
    Avatar photostevecaution
    Blocked
    • Total Posts 8241

    Even on the French Derby form Study Of Man didn’t have much to spare over Patascoy. Taking into account that he may not be fully wound up, it made him a bad bet at the odds he was.

    I don’t think the French Derby was a good race and in fact I thought all their classics were below standard this year. Olmedo has clearly gone amiss somewhere but even his French Guineas win has only seen one winner from 16 starts and that was US Navy Flag when eventually dropped to 6F in the July Cup.

    Going into the French Derby I had backed Olmedo and didn’t really have a fancy for anything else. I didn’t view Study Of Man as a genuine Group 1 quality winner.

    Pascal Bary tends to stay at home and I have given up backing any of his for races in the British Isles.

    I can’t visualise Study Of Man troubling the older horses in the Arc and I am confident he’s a place lay for that race. Entire Classic or not, I take the view that if it looks and feels “Boggin'” it is probably “Boggin'”

    Thanks for the good crack. Time for me to move on. Be lucky.

    #1363242
    ham
    Participant
    • Total Posts 3633

    Proximity to patascoy may suggest he ran closer to form than the bare look of it

Viewing 7 posts - 18 through 24 (of 24 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.