- This topic has 68 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 8 months ago by gamble.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 15, 2006 at 13:44 #98447
:old:<br> <br> Matron this is the largest teacup<br> filled with the frothiest sea of conjecture<br> and Diane outgows Katrina<br> in what must be the, liveliest, biggest godammed brew<br> to grace these shores in many a boring month
I no longer consider myself a big gun in here<br> just a small smith and vest on<br> who inspects from time to time<br> for any interesting nuclear washing.
<br>flatcapgamble… sadly he hasn’t probably finished. Sal nice to see some more viewpoints – everybody’s view is equal in here, apart from Jim who pulls a cart through convention. :cool:
February 15, 2006 at 16:11 #98448Hopefully a closing post for me on this subject which confirms to me beyond any reasonable doubt my stance on this issue is correct. The said ex-member in question has recently upload extract material referencing a private message conversation between him and I when he had my trust.
Although I could put numerous material right for the record, as I said earlier, I can’t be bothered as some people will only see what they want to see, and even if I bothered to explain I’d be wasting my time.  I have tried to stay above all the pettyness but things needed to be put to bed as it’s getting boring going over the same issues, over and over again. :banghead:
February 15, 2006 at 17:19 #98449I appologise for using the word "banned" in my last post, it was more of a suspension as DL put it as I was back in the next day and it didn’t have anything to do with anything on the forum and there was only about six members in there at the time anyway, sorry for the confusion Grass, didn’t expect you to jump in like you did :biggrin:
Out of all members that have been banned on this forum why is it that there’s a "campaign" to get a certain one back? let it go he’s gone from here and that ought to be the end of it, if anyone wants to talk to the banned member in question then I’m sure he’s not all that far away.
Gamble, my avatar says JTS_ONLY because I designed it myself and sometimes new members would use it not knowing, just ask Mesh, she took my original one :biggrin:
<br>Now can we end all this nonsense before the banned member starts another topic and has all his disciples in a rant over at his place? :biggrin:
February 15, 2006 at 18:43 #98450Sorry I took your avatar Jim, it was too good to miss :biggrin: :biggrin: :biggrin:
Seems I’m not the only one with this avatar anymore though, never mind!
February 15, 2006 at 21:41 #98451If I remember rightly wasn’t gamble once banned ??
February 15, 2006 at 22:09 #98452:old:
I certainly was Dave and full score,<br> and am the living proof of the pudding.<br> They even likened me to an onion <br> as my murder was committed.<br> Zass was the funny guy who<br> suggested peeling me,<br> but instead I was smitten in half<br> by the white knight’s axe.
I believe I am the only poster<br> clever enough to have squirelled my<br> way back into this house.
I like a strong regime<br> a boot click on every corner<br> but favour banishment with a possibility of return<br> to the medieval White hand of death
flatcapgamble…of course despite returning back here gamble has since met his own death over two years ago and writes with an ever shaky finger.:cool:
February 15, 2006 at 22:11 #98453I thought you had been, old stocking .. :biggrin: <br>
February 15, 2006 at 23:03 #98454I do make exceptions on rare occasions and Slippy convinced me I had mis-interprated the onions first post where he claimed to be a TRF hacker – but to be fair who can interpate some of his posts, if any at all! :biggrin:
February 16, 2006 at 09:46 #98455:old:<br> As an onion I can make anyone cry, so be careful :biggrin:
My initial posturing on this site was possibly a mistake. I came in far too heavy, however, I do not believe you were convinced I was the hacker responsible for downing the site for three days – no I just think you thought I was an objectionable personality who spoke with a strange tongue who would be difficult to control. You have stated that allowing me back in was your worst mistake, and for this reason I tread on eggshells to get my point
If I gambled with my old intro<br> I certainly lost the gamble
flatcapgamble…I found the outisde of space quite exciting. Great walks.
February 16, 2006 at 10:20 #98456I knew you weren’t a hacker but your registration coincided with a serious problem I just had using the old registration system whereby a person was registering multiple memberships & I had only just brought in the new mailing one to prevent this.
Truth be told, I thought you were somebody else until Slippy who I trusted ensured me you weren’t, and yes I thought it was a mistake reinstating you as you seemed hell bent on not letting sleeping dogs lie (and still don’t). Although I still don’t understand you 50% of the time I don’t think your intentions are malicious like I did originally but just a liking for intrigue.
Wow, if you have been walked on eggshells I can’t imagine what you’d be like strutting on concrete!!
I hear the outside of space has greener grass?? :biggrin:<br>
February 16, 2006 at 10:25 #98457<br> :old:
I wrote in the style of gamble<br> and was buttoned on my third post.<br> Six months in the cold fringes<br> even with the greener grass<br> is a very long time to rectify a mistake<br> Guantanimo !
February 16, 2006 at 10:47 #98458Just for the record people have this big myth there’s a big red button labeled ‘Ban’. It’s a tiny little hyperlink that says ‘delete this member and it even questions me to make sure!
You still vanish for 6 months at a time now anyway, didn’t it coincide with your hibernation period then? :biggrin:
Shells, old age pensioner icons, grass, space outside, great walks, instead of the sheep you may want to use this avatar:
February 16, 2006 at 11:02 #98459I was a far more active worder in those days<br> and I was very keen to write on here.<br> Certainly I take long breaks these days<br> I am spent in many ways<br> in both worlds.<br> Here there is little intigue<br> however you have more than<br> helped in this departmnent,<br> with your sometimes swingeing ways,<br> and full frontal attack approach.<br> The sheep of god suits me thanks<br> it counterbalances my darkman<br> Oh great white sword<br>
February 28, 2006 at 20:22 #98460In the words of the ‘late’, great, much-maligned and misunderstood, Gary Glitter,
Hello, hello, I’m back again……
My 3rd incarnation and counting
A sniff of ma oxters to whoever can name the first ?
February 28, 2006 at 21:13 #98461<br> :old:
When I die and they lay me to rest<br> Gonna go to the place I love best
Norman Greenbum.
Give me five years kickon<br> There appears a whiff of braised cygnet about you<br> but indeed you are a strange three headed creature<br> and I wonder if you will be hacked down<br> and transported to the spirit in the sky<br> or do you expect the very deadness of the lounge<br> to turn your rare brand of ‘evil’ into lifesaving page views ?
February 28, 2006 at 21:48 #98462They seek him here, they seek him there<br>Those posters seek him everywhere<br>Is he in heaven?, or is he in hell?<br>That damned elusive Sa-an-dy
February 28, 2006 at 22:15 #98463:old: geezer
Grass your name suggests you know more than most,<br> but I wonder if your young hopping years ever encountered<br> anything quite as lame duck as golden cygnet<br> who even dropped his h as the axe fell<br> to chicken liver flavour his neck in two pieces
Certainly kickon you have chosen your time well<br> for the most curious and brazen of outages.<br> You certainly live your three lives dangerously<br> and I hazard you may have even another<br> character up your sleeve<br> complete with large nose and false pimpernell.
<br> flatcapgamble… if your Sandyguts bend over and show us your scar :biggrin:
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.