I was amused by comments made by Ted Walsh, attributed to A E Lynch (jockey of Jim), after the 17f G1 Chase won by Nickname on Wednesday.
Basically, according to the celebrated pundit, the jockey intimated that he was under "strict instructions from the owner" to take the lead in the race and once Central House had challenged, had therefore no option but to increase the pace, to, hopefully was clear, the detriment of the horse’s chances in the race.
We have also seen with horse’s like Flagship Uberalles and, perhaps, Iris’ Gift, high-class horses whose owners have either demanded unrealistic expectations from their trainer/jockeys and/or have continued against the popular conceptions of the general public as to the entries of their horses.
How "involved" should owners be in the career of their steeds? Should it be a healthy consultation with the trainer, or, as the horse is their property and the trainer an employee (of sorts, or at least a service provider) does "carte blanche" apply.
Should it descend to jockeys’ instructions?