Is it the (over-)use of this analysis that particularly grates, or the person analysing, or both?
Both probably.
The Carson/Bartlett combo last week got me up in arms but I guess I’ve tolerated it until then without feeling teh need to vent off so it can’t be that big of a problem.
I guess I don’t find Francome irritating as he keeps his comments brief, focuses on the pertinent points and quickly hands back.